09/0152 - MCU - Mulitple Housing Type 1 - Relative or Employee [As Published] · 132009.152

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 (DAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.3, 9 May 2008

 

CONSERVATION ESTATE

 

 

2.12 {Is the proposal for urban pyoses, as defined under the IPA?
Yes

LINo - Go 02.13
If yes, is the use proposed on a lot situated in, or within 100m of, any of the following?
(i) A protected area, forest reserve, critical habitat or area of major interest under the Nature Conservation Ono ClYes

Act 1992
(ii) A State forest or timber reserve under the Forestry Act 1959 we Ao (Yes
(iii) A marine park under the Marine Parks Act 2004 (No O Yes
(iv) A recreation area under the Recreation Area Management Act 1988 _ (Wo Oves_
(v) A world heritage area listed under the World Heritage Convention Mo 0 Yes

Mio 1 Yes ,

If yes to any one of (i) — (vi) above - This application must be referred to the chief executive under the relevant Act mentioned as Advice Agency.

(vi) Brisbane forest park under the Brisbane Forest Park Act 1977

 

PRC MASE Pe EL

 

|REMOVAL, DESTRUCTION OR DAMAGE OF A MARINE PLANT

 

 

 

2.13 | Does the proposed use involve the removal, destruction or damage of marine plants under the Fisheries Act 1994?

No - End of Secton2 (C] Yes
'fyes, is the proposed operational work reasonably necessary for: (Tick applicable box‘es and answer (a) and/or (b) below)

(i) The removal, destruction or damage of dead marine wood on unallocated State land, other thanina (()No (J Yes
wild river area, for trade orcommerce oe . .

(ii) The maintenance of existing structures, including, for example, the following structures, if they were  [-]No [J Yes
constructed in compliance with all the requirements, under any Act, relating to a structure of that type -
+ boat ramps, boardwalks, drains, fences, jetties, roads, safety signs, swimming enclosures and weirs;
+ existing drainage structures;
+ existing powerlines or associated powerline infrastructure . _ oo.

(iii) Educational or research purposes or for monitoring the impact of development on marine plants ino (Yes ,

('v)_ The construction or placement of structures, including, for example, swimming enclosures, safety signs, aids [1] No (1 Yes
to navigation, fences, pontoons, public boat ramps and pipelines, if-
«the extent of the removal, destruction or damage is minor; and
+ _ the structures were constructed in compliance with all the requirements, under any Acl, relating to a

structure of that type

{v) The construction of runnels for mosquito control, removal of Lyngbya, seed collection tor site rehabilitation or ([]}No ([] Yes
the collection of marine plants for fishing bait, or handicraft

(a) If yes to one or more of (i) - (v) above, does all of the proposed operational work comply with any applicable Department
of Primary Industries and Fisheries (DPI&F) self-assessable code?
Yes - A permit is not required for that aspect of the proposed operational work. End of Section 2 oO No - Go to (b)

{b) If no to all of (i) - (v) or no to (a) above, does a development permit exist for that proposed operational work?

C1 Yes - End of Sectin2 ~~ [] No e
If no, has approval been sought in a separate application?
CO Yes - End of Section 2 (I No - This application is also taken to be an application for operational work for removing, destroying or

damaging marine plants under the Fisheries Act 1994. (Complete Section 4 of this checklist).

24 eotrg Da - Dy

     

 

 

Page 14