Original source · versioned page text
Appendix D - Geotechnical Report
Very large file (16.9 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.
3. Aims & Method of Investigation The main aims of the investigation were to address potential geotechnical constraints for the proposed subdivision, along with an assessment of slope stability. It is understood that this report will be submitted to Noosa Council (NC) in support of a Development Application for Reconfiguration of a Lot. The investigation and report have therefore been designed to address the requirements of the relevant NC codes and policies. However, it should be noted that this report only covers geotechnical matters to address relevant parts of the NC Landslide Hazard Overlay Code and does not consider any other requirements of the Code (e.g. site aesthetics, scenic amenity etc.). 3.1 Fieldwork An experienced engineering geologist from Tectonic undertook a site walk-over on 3 March 2026 to visually assess indicators of past slope instability. The walk-over included assessment of soil and rock outcrops, surface drainage, topography, evidence of erosion, vegetation, and condition of structures. This was incorporated with a subsurface investigation, which comprised the excavation of eight test pits (designated TP1, TP2, TP3A, TP3B to TP7) supervised by a geotechnical engineer from Tectonic. The test pits were undertaken using a 5.5 tonne excavator with a toothed bucket and ripper attachments to depths between 1.2 m and 3.1 m below ground level (BGL), across the proposed development areas. In situ soil strength was assessed using dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) testing from surface adjacent to each test pit (other than TP7), and using a pocket penetrometer (PP) on undisturbed U50 tube samples, relatively undisturbed clayey block samples and test pit sidewalls (where safe to enter). Disturbed samples were recovered from select test pits. The test pits were backfilled progressively on completion, with excavation spoil left slightly mounded at the surface. Co-ordinates were obtained using a handheld GPS unit with a recorded accuracy of ±3 m. The test pits reports, along with explanatory notes, are presented in Appendix A. Approximate test locations are shown in Figure 1, attached at the end of this report. 4. Laboratory Testing An undisturbed U50 tube sample and a small disturbed sample were dispatched to a NATA accredited laboratory for geotechnical testing. Laboratory testing was undertaken in accordance with Australian Standard AS1289 Methods of Testing Soils for Engineering Purposes and comprised one Shrink-Swell Index analysis and one Atterberg Limits and complimentary Particle Size Distribution (PSD) test. Laboratory test results are discussed in Section 5.8. The full laboratory test certificates are attached in Appendix B. Geotechnical Investigation 10 June 2026 | 26073-001-Rev0 3
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.