09/0928 - Operational Works - Detached House Driveway [As Published] · 142009.928

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997” . , , IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 22

 

|WILD RIVER AREA

  

 

os

 

 

415

Is any of the operational work proposed to be carried out in a wild river area declared under the Wild
HY No-Gotoasis Ly} Yes : .

If yes, is-the proposed operational work for the following and also deciared under the wild river declaration for the areas to be

assessable? —. :
(i) Agricultural activities as defined under the Wild Rivers Act 2005 LINo OYes
(i) Animal husbandry activities as defined under the Wild Rivers Act 2005 [CINo O1Yes

IPA schedule 8. part 1, table 4, ilesn 10; 1P Regulation, schedule 2. tahie 2, tem 37; Wad Rivers Act 2005. sections 42.

 

If yes-to either (i) or (ti) above, is any part of the premises in the wild river high preservation area? :
Yes - An application for the operational work will.be taken to be not ‘Properly made and the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive it.
[No . ,

f1na, is the proposed use in relation to the production of a high risk species as defined under the Wild Rivers Act 20057
oO Yes - An application for the operational work will be taken.to be not property made and the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive it

No - Unless the application Is consistent with any property development plan epplying to the land, the Assessment Manager must refuse to
“receive It (Complete Form 1, Part Q if agriculture. Complote Form 1, Part R Hf animal husbandry) Subject to the declaration for the
relevant wild river area, this application requires assessment by the Department of Natural Resources and Water (NRW). It NRW is not
the Assessment Manager for the application, the agency has jurisdiction as Concurrence Agency.

RA.

 

 

STATE;CONTROLLED ROAD’

 

  

     

 

14.16

 

It

 

Is any part of the premises located in part of a future State-controlled road, or within 100m of a State-controlled road?
No- .
It yes, is the proposed operational work associated with either -

IPA, schedule @ - Answer (a) -{c) below.

IP Regulation, schedule 2, lade 2. tem 3

 

Endotsectons (] Yes

A material change of use that is assessable under the planning scheme; or : [ino Dyes
Reconfiguring a lot that increases the total number of lots, or increases the total number of lots
_ abutting the State-controlled road se ,

no, and answers to questions in this section of the checklist indicate the proposed operational work is asséssable under

{a) Is any of the oa operational work associated with access to a State-controlled road?

No Yes - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (OMR) as Concurrence Agency.
. - - . <
-(b) 4s any of the proposed operational work for filling or excavation?
No Yes

: On is the operational work proposed in a future State-controlled road not defined by route?
No - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.
0 Yes - This application must be referred to the OMR es Advice Agency.

(c) Does any of the proposed operational work involve the redirection or intensification of site stormwater from the land,
through a pipe “ry cross-sectional area greater than 625cm? that directs stormwater to a State-controlled road?
‘TINO: Yes

lf eS, is the operational work proposed in a future State-controlled road not defined by route?
oO No - This application must be referred to the Department of Main Roads (DMR) as Concurrence Agency.
(1 Yes - mis apptication must be referred to the DMR as Advice Agency.

 

 

Page 39