Original source · versioned page text
Arborist Report inc VMP
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (12.8 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Arborist Report 14 Serenity Close, Noosa Heads 5.2 APPROVED ‘VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN’ AUDIT The results of the tree survey and arboricultural assessment indicated several differences between the approved ‘vegetation management plan’ and current location and status of the 17 trees: ● Five (5) trees shown on the approved ‘vegetation management plan’ were shown in the wrong location. Trees 8, 15, 79, 101 and 235 were located ≥ 1m from the tree survey points taken in 2022. Habitat trees that were present on site in 2022 were recorded via GPS with 7cm accuracy. ● Eight (8) Glossy Black Cockatoo habitat trees shown on the approved ‘vegetation management plan’ were not present on site during the 2022 tree survey. ● Two (2) Glossy Black Cockatoo trees (Trees 57 and 60) and one (1) Koala tree (Tree 221) were assessed as being in poor condition. Tree 57 was described as heavily leaning with a split trunk (Figure 4) and Tree 60 was described as leaning with a vine in the canopy (Figure 5). Despite their poor condition, these trees must be retained as part of the existing development approval over the land. 5.3 EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT Results of the assessment of tree retention opportunities indicated that trees were nominated for removal where: ● the vegetation was exotic or a pest species and located where it could ‘escape’ to adjacent natural areas, ● tree condition was such that long term survival could not be guaranteed i.e. trees in poor condition and the tree did not provide significant habitat value e.g. contained hollows for arboreal mammals, reptiles or birds, ● impacts exceeded tolerable levels ex post evaluation of design and construction measures; and, ● necessary for the construction / installation of services. Due to the location of proposed development on the northernmost part of the land, opportunities to retain significant vegetation were predominantly around the eastern and southern perimeter of the building footprint, particularly within areas of the land zoned Environmental Management and Conservation. The retention of trees around the eastern and southern perimeter of the building footprint: ● reduces the potential visual impact of the proposed development, ● provides a landscape buffer between development and the Weyba Creek Bushland Reserve North, and ● increases amenity both within and external to the site. 12 | 25
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.