Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Original source · versioned page text

Arborist Report inc VMP

of 44

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (12.8 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Arborist Report
14 Serenity Close, Noosa Heads




5.2 APPROVED ‘VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN’ AUDIT


The results of the tree survey and arboricultural assessment indicated several differences
between the approved ‘vegetation management plan’ and current location and status of
the 17 trees:

   ● Five (5) trees shown on the approved ‘vegetation management plan’ were shown in
      the wrong location. Trees 8, 15, 79, 101 and 235 were located ≥ 1m from the tree
      survey points taken in 2022. Habitat trees that were present on site in 2022 were
      recorded via GPS with 7cm accuracy.
   ● Eight (8) Glossy Black Cockatoo habitat trees shown on the approved ‘vegetation
      management plan’ were not present on site during the 2022 tree survey.
   ● Two (2) Glossy Black Cockatoo trees (Trees 57 and 60) and one (1) Koala tree (Tree
      221) were assessed as being in poor condition. Tree 57 was described as heavily
      leaning with a split trunk (Figure 4) and Tree 60 was described as leaning with a
      vine in the canopy (Figure 5). Despite their poor condition, these trees must be
      retained as part of the existing development approval over the land.




5.3 EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT


Results of the assessment of tree retention opportunities indicated that trees were
nominated for removal where:

   ● the vegetation was exotic or a pest species and located where it could ‘escape’ to
      adjacent natural areas,
   ● tree condition was such that long term survival could not be guaranteed i.e. trees in
      poor condition and the tree did not provide significant habitat value e.g. contained
      hollows for arboreal mammals, reptiles or birds,
   ● impacts exceeded tolerable levels ex post evaluation of design and construction
      measures; and,
   ● necessary for the construction / installation of services.

Due to the location of proposed development on the northernmost part of the land,
opportunities to retain significant vegetation were predominantly around the eastern and
southern perimeter of the building footprint, particularly within areas of the land zoned
Environmental Management and Conservation. The retention of trees around the eastern
and southern perimeter of the building footprint:

   ● reduces the potential visual impact of the proposed development,
   ● provides a landscape buffer between development and the Weyba Creek Bushland
      Reserve North, and
   ● increases amenity both within and external to the site.




                                                                                      12 | 25
Log in to download the original file

Arborist Report inc VMP.pdf · 12.8 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.