2020-10-12 General Committee Minutes

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES                                             12 OCTOBER 2020


        A.   Refuse the application for the following reasons:
             1.    The proposed development is not consistent with the Desired
                   Environmental Outcomes 3.1.3(d)(i) and (ii) of the Noosa Plan 2006 as it
                   does not protect the heritage character building and provide for adaptive
                   re-use of the existing building.
             2.    The proposed development is not consistent with the Overall Outcomes
                   6.7.2(n) and (r) of the Cooroy and Lake Macdonald Locality Code of the
                   Noosa Plan 2006 as the proposed development does not maintain or
                   compliment the traditional country streetscape and building forms of
                   Cooroy.
             3.    The proposed development is not consistent with Specific Outcome O16 of
                   the Cooroy and Lake Macdonald Locality Code of the Noosa Plan 2006 as
                   it does not provide a traditional roof form which contributes positively to the
                   local skyline or complement the character of the locality.
             4.    The proposed development is not consistent with Overall Outcomes
                   13.16.2(f)(i), (ii), (iv), (v) and (viii), Specific Outcomes O5, O6 and O7 of the
                   Heritage Overlay and Specific Outcome O63 of the Community Services
                   Zone of the Noosa Plan 2006 as it:
                   i.     does not retain the existing heritage character building;
                   ii.    will adversely impact on the streetscape character;
                   iii.   proposes a built form which is not reflective of the historic
                          architectural features in Cooroy; and
                   iv.    does not maintain a domestic character and form consistent with the
                          Queensland vernacular specifically sought in Maple Street.
             5.    The proposed development is not consistent with Overall Outcomes
                   14.110.2 c) and d) and Specific Outcomes O7 and O8 of the Driveways
                   and Carparking Code of the Noosa Plan 2006 as:
                   i.     the proposed car parking arrangements will not meet the reasonable
                          requirements of the proposed use with the number of tandem spaces
                          excessive; and
                   ii.    suitable manoeuvring areas for waste collection and service vehicles
                          has not been demonstrated.
             6.    The proposed development is contrary to the Noosa Plan 2020 provisions
                   which similarly seek to protect the heritage qualities of the site and the
                   streetscape character.
        B.   Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act
             2016.


        For:       Crs Stockwell, Jurisevic and Wilkie
        Against:   Crs Stewart, Lorentson, Finzel and Wegener
                                                                                              Lost.




                                                                                      Page 3 of 16