Original source · versioned page text
Part Response to NC IR
Page 4 Item 10: Please provide a suitable location for the relocation of the pandanas mentioned above. Applicant’s Response to Item 10: The applicant has investigated the relocation of the existing pandanas on site however due to the size of the tree and its location it is not an economically feasible option. The tree unfortunately will be required to be removed. Item 11: Please provide boundary fence articulation in accordance with the planning scheme. Applicant’s Response to Item11: The applicant is willing to accept a condition in this regard. Item 12: Amend the plans to include the relevant works described in The Transport, Roads and Drainage Code – Probable Solution S13.1 or alternatively provide justification for why the works have not been included in the subject application Applicant’s Response to Item 12: Please refer to Attachment B and Attachment B for a response prepared by SCG Consulting Engineers. Item 13: Provide plans the indicate sight lines. Applicant’s Response to Item 13: Please refer to Attachment B and Attachment B for a response prepared by SCG Consulting Engineers. Item 14: Provide comment from the design engineer in regard to the retained portion of the existing driveway Applicant’s Response to Item 14: Please refer to Attachment B and Attachment B for a response prepared by SCG Consulting Engineers. Item 15: Provide plans that demonstrate compliance with The Driveways and Carparking Code – Specific Outcome 6. Applicant’s Response to Item 15: Please refer to Attachment B and Attachment B for a response prepared by SCG Consulting Engineers.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.