Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Original source · versioned page text

MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Various - Petition Kelly Gerber

of 37

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file (14.4 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

..•
                  Given that the immediate land uses adjoining the site are for Community Use the
                  proposed service station development is not compatible with the surrounding
                  land use. For example, the proposed service station will provide constant
                  temptation for children to purchase fast foods and drinks (and other
                  inappropriate items) from the nearby shop.


                  The proposed development would only be considered compatible if it was
                  located across either the Eumundi Noosa Road or Walter Hay drive, from the
                  subject site, where the development is of a predominately industrial nature.


                  Noosa Plan- Zone Map 8 (Figure 1) clearly illustrates that the current zoning of
                  the site as Industry (purple) is mismatched with the zoning of the land which
                  immediately surrounds it, being community land uses (yellow). Accordingly, the
                  proposed service station does not represent a logical or sensible form of
                  development over the subject premises.




                 Figurel: NoosaPlan- Zone Map 8 (Source:NoosaCouncil)


             e) Other planning grounds


      94.   Further guidance as to what the SPA envisages by way of "grounds" is contained in
            "Statutory Guideline 05/09" referred to above. It provides non-exhaustive guidance
            as to what may be considered in determining whether there are sufficient grounds to
            justify a decision that conflicts with a relevant planning instrument.           The following
            grounds are set out in the guideline:


                  •   Relevant instrument is out af date

                      Example 2- The planning scheme is due for review and daes not reflect current
                      planning trends and principles, such as design principles, methods for addressing
                      climate change ar demographic shifts.

                 •    The relevant instrument is incorrect in terms of its substance or underlying
                      assumptions for the circumstances of the particular proposal.

                                                                                                          26
Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0095 & REC15_0022 PM Submission Object - Various - Petition Kelly Gerber.pdf · 14.4 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.