Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Original source · versioned page text

MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Various - Petition Kelly Gerber

of 37

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file (14.4 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

~       ..
    Specific Outcome of Code               Applicant's Assessment            Submitter's   Assessment


    033 Traffic generated by the           S33.1 Complies                    Does not Comply
    development is within the acceptable   The deveiopment will comply       It is the applicant's responsibility to establish
    capacity of external roads and does    where reasonably applicable.      how the DA complies with the Code. The
    not have an adverse impact upon the                                      applicant has not satisfied this criterion as no
    functioning of the road network                                          details have been provided as to how the DA
                                                                             achieves this specific outcome. "Reasonably
                                                                             applicable" is indeterminate.     The DA has an
                                                                             adverse impact upon the functioning of the
                                                                             road network. The Applicant has failed to
                                                                             provide objective evidence or argument to
                                                                             show otherwise.


    BUSINESSUSESCODE


    020 Development is designed and        020 Complies                      Does not Comply
    sited to avoid noise emissions that    The proposed development          It is the applicant's responsibility to establish
    unreasonably diminish the amenity of   is suitably distance and          how the DA complies with the Code. The
    the area or surrounding uses.          buffered through landscaping      applicant has not satisfied this criteria as
                                           from sensitive land uses.         sufficient details have not been provided as
                                           Further, as the site is located   to how the DA achieves this specific
                                           on a busy road and                outcome. It is considered that the DA is not
                                           roundabout, it is considered      suitably distanced or buffered from the
                                           that there will be no             adjacent GSLCwhich is a sensitive land use.
                                           worsening effects in terms of
                                           noise.                            The applicant's statement that "it is
                                                                             considered that there will be no worsening
                                                                             effects in terms of noise" is not supported
                                                                             with objective evidence, such as detailed
                                                                             studies showing existing background noise
                                                                             levels and projected additional noise
                                                                             generation, particularly given the DA's
                                                                             proximity to the noise sensitive study
                                                                             environment    of the GSLC.


    027 Buildings and structures are       S27.1 Complies                    Does not Comply
    designed to minimise opportunities     The proposed development          All such facilities are conducive to loitering
    for vandalism.                         will incorporates a building      and provide opportunities     for concealment
                                           design and layout which will      which poses an unacceptable danger to the
                                           provide for non-graffiti          students going to and from the GSLC
                                           friendly development,             particularly in early mornings or evenings
                                           structures and layout             before or after extracurricular   school
                                           through design within an          activities. Furthermore, the close proximity
                                           absence of natural ladders,       of such a facility poses and unacceptable risk
                                           minimal unbroken vertical         to the security of the GSLCpremises and its
                                           surface areas, CCTV               students.
                                           surveillance, a small retail


                                                                                                                   30
Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0095 & REC15_0022 PM Submission Object - Various - Petition Kelly Gerber.pdf · 14.4 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.