Original source · versioned page text
1. NC_Covering letter Minor change 1124
that the changes have no appreciable effect on any matters relating to
State interests or changes to the existing staff and student cohort;
(E) it would not cause the application to be subject to public notice, given
the original application was impact assessable development and subject
to public notice;
Schedule 1 of the DA Rules (Substantially different development) further provides
that a change may be considered to result in a substantially different development if
any of the following apply to the proposed change:
(a) involves a new use; or
(b) results in the application applying to a new parcel of land; or
(c) dramatically changes the built form in terms of scale, bulk and appearance; or
(d) changes the ability of the proposed development to operate as intended; or
(e) removes a component that is integral to the operation of the development; or
(f) significantly impacts on traffic flow and the transport network, such as
increasing traffic to the site; or
(g) introduces new impacts or increase the severity of known impacts; or
(h) removes an incentive or offset component that would have balanced a negative
impact of the development; or
(i) impacts on infrastructure provisions.
The proposed changes do not result in substantially different development for the
following reasons:
(a) the proposed changes do not involve a new use of the land, with the minor
extension to the Gymnasium and minor pavements providing for improved
facilities for the existing use and remaining ancillary to the approved use of the
site;
(b) the proposed changes do not result in the application applying to a new parcel
of land;
(c) the proposed changes do not dramatically change the built form in terms of
scale, bulk and appearance, with new building works being minor (17 m2 GFA)
and located under the existing building roofline;
(d) the proposed changes do not change the ability of the proposed development to
operate as intended, with the proposal resulting solely in improved facilities for
existing staff and students;
(e) the proposed changes do not remove a component that is integral to the
operation of the development, with no vegetation removal required;
(f) the proposed changes do not result in any significant changes to or impacts on
traffic flow or the transport network, such as increasing traffic to the site. No
additional traffic is expected to be generated as a consequence of the changes
given there is no effect on staff or student numbers as a consequence of the
development;
(g) the proposed changes do not introduce new impacts or increase the severity of
known impacts, with the changes resulting solely in improved facilities for the
existing staff and student cohort;
5
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original