Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Original source · versioned page text

16187pf.mv

Attached to the e-mail MCU14/0102 - Response to information request - Email 1 of 2. 139 Eumundi Noosa Rd & 30 Lionel Donovan Drive Noosaville.

of 11

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Council’s Ref:   MCU14/0102
Our Ref:         14124 / 16187pf.mv



2 April 2015


The Chief Executive Officer
Noosa Council
PO Box 141
Tewantin QLD 4565

Via: [email protected]


Attention: Glen Conforti


Dear Sir,

Response to Information Request
Development application for Development Permit for Material Change of
Use of Premises for Industrial Business Type 1 Warehouse, Industrial
Business Type 2 Production, Alteration, Repackaging & Repairing, Retail
Business Type 2 Shop & Salon, Retail Business Type 5 Vehicle Uses, Retail
Business Type 6 Hardware Store & Entertainment & Dining Business Type 1
Food & Beverages on land at 139 Eumundi Noosa Road & 30 Lionel
Donovan Drive, Noosaville (Council ref. MCU14/0102)

Following is our client’s (the applicant) response to Council’s Information
Request issued by letter dated 27 January 2015. Please note that this response is
made pursuant to the Sustainable Planning Act 2009, wherein the applicant is
responding by giving “all of the information requested…”

Each issue raised by Council has been provided below, with the applicant’s
response provided underneath each issue.

1. Please provide an amended plan with the development setback a minimum
   of 4.5m to Lionel Donovan Drive.

Applicant’s response
The proposal has been amended and now provides a setback of 15.10m to
Lionel Donovan Drive. Refer to the amended proposal plans provided in
Appendix A.

2. Provide a greater setback to Walter Hay Drive to reduce the prominence of
   the development to this frontage.

Applicant’s response
The proposal plans (refer Appendix A) have been amended to now provide a
building setback to Walter Hay Drive ranging from 6m (north eastern corner of
the proposed building) to 10.59m at the widest point. The average setback
would be between 7 & 8 metres.
Log in to download the original file

16187pf.mv.pdf · 255 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.