Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Original source · versioned page text

Response to Council IR

of 4

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

 Page 2

Item 3: 3. Provide detailed plans, prepared by a RPEQ (Registered Professional Engineer of
Queensland), of the new proposed stormwater line, including but not limited to:
   a. A longitudinal section of this drainage line, detailing finished surface levels, pipe diameters, pits’
   sizes, invert levels, chainages, materials, etc.;
   b. Easement details, designed in accordance with Noosa Council’s Planning Scheme Policy 6 –
   Engineering Design Standards. Note that the easement must be 4 metres wide (minimum) and
   centrally located in relation to the pipe;
   c. Decommissioning details of the existing stormwater infrastructure (must be removed) and
   connections of new proposed stormwater line to existing infrastructure.

Applicant’s Response to Item 3: Please refer to Attachments C and D which provides a response
from SCG Consulting Engineers.

Item 4: Provide RPEQ written certification, certifying that the proposed stormwater management plan,
as detailed in SCG’s plan 31026-SW1.1, titled “Stormwater Management Plan“, dated February 2021,
will not cause a worsening of stormwater conditions by adversely altering stormwater drainage
characteristics external to the site, including, but not limited to:
    a. Additional ponding on neighbouring properties or on road reserve;
    b. Increased runoff onto neighbouring properties or road reserve.

Applicant’s Response to Item 4: Please refer to Attachments C and D which provides a response
from SCG Consulting Engineers.


Item 5: Amend SCG’s plan 31026-SW1.1, titled “Stormwater Management Plan“, dated February
2021 to exclude any reference to PVC kerb adaptors – these must be metallic.

Applicant’s Response to Item 5: Please refer to Attachments C and D which provides a response
from SCG Consulting Engineers.


Item 6: Provide amended plans, prepared by a RPEQ, indicating, but not limited to:
   a. the height of the proposed retaining walls along the subject properties boundaries (levels at top
   of wall compared to neighbouring ground levels);
   b. any fencing to be installed on top of or beside the walls;
   c. the height of any fencing to be installed on top of or beside the walls;

Applicant’s Response to Item 6: Please refer to Attachments C and D which provides a response
from SCG Consulting Engineers.


Item 7: Detail any amenity impacts on neighbouring properties.

Applicant’s Response to Item 7: Item 7 comments that the proposed works include significant fill with
retaining walls along most boundaries of the subject properties and requests details of impacts on
neighbouring properties. As detailed in Attachment B the retaining wall and fence will have a typical
height of 2.8 metres which includes 900mm of fill required for minimum floor heights and screen
fencing typical for the area. The 900mm of fill required on the site is to comply with Councils minimum
floor height requirements for flooding and the fencing required for safety and privacy.

The fencing and fill has been engineered to address stormwater drainage on site and on adjoining
premises whilst providing privacy for the development and surrounding sites. An extract of the
proposed fencing and fill details is provided below.
Log in to download the original file

Response to Council IR.pdf · 599 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.