Skip to the record
NoosaWatch™: The source of truth.

Original source · versioned page text

2022-08-09 Planning & Environment Meeting Agenda

of 103

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (18.8 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA   9 AUGUST 2022




                                                   Page 10 of 103

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                                  9 AUGUST 2022

            COUNCIL POLICY

            Council recognises the need to support impacted communities while also conserving flying-foxes
            and the critical ecological services they provide. This SoMI outlines how Council plans to manage
            flying-fox populations and associated community impacts within the Noosa LGA.

            Council is committed to conserving flying-foxes and natural areas, and therefore does not support
            flying-fox dispersal or destruction of roosts. Dispersal is also extremely costly with unpredictable
            outcomes, usually with only short-term results where flying-foxes re-establish the original roost and
            often create additional new roosts in the process. Dispersal may be considered in extreme cases,
            where there is a risk or significant impact that cannot be managed in other ways. Any management
            will be implemented using a staged approach to ensure that costs and impacts to flying-foxes (and
            other ecological values) are minimised.

            Council will consider the following to decide what action is appropriate at a particular site:

                -  location of the roost and land tenure
                -  size, occupancy and history of the roost
                +  community concerns
                +  species present and timing of breeding
                -  ecological values including threatened fauna and/or flora species and communities
                -  cost of management actions
                -  risks associated with management
                -  the likelihood of management actions addressing community concerns
                -  latest information from researchers.

            There are several actions that may be undertaken to manage conflict between flying-foxes and the
            surrounding community, including education, regular monitoring, vegetation works, buffering
            techniques (e.g. canopy-sprinkler systems) and subsidy programs. The level of conflict at each roost,
            in combination with other site-specific factors, will guide the type of action undertaken. The figures
            below provide an overview of this framework to guide flying-fox management decision-making.

            Indicators of roost conflict level

                                                     Medium conflict                     High conflict
             * No sensitive receptors within    * Moderately sensitive            * Highly sensitive receptor(s)
              proximity of the roost             receptor(s) within proximity of   within proximity of the roost
             + Low number of flying-foxes       the roost                         + Large number of flying-foxes
              present                           * Medium number of flying-         present, or consistent large
             + Low potential for roost to       foxes present, with the            seasonal influxes
              expand                             potential for large influxes     + High potential for roost to
             « Low impact on surrounding        + Moderate potential for roost     expand
              residential properties            to expand —                       + High impact on residential
             ¢ Relatively large distance        * Moderate impact on               properties
              between roost and residential      residential properties           * No or little distance between
              properties                        * Moderate distance between        roost and residential
                                                 roost and residential             properties
                                                 properties

                                                                                                         Page 4

                                                                                                  Page 10 of 103
Log in to download the original file

2022-08-09 Planning & Environment Meeting Agenda(PDF, 18MB).pdf · 18.8 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.