Original source · versioned page text
2022-08-09 Planning & Environment Meeting Agenda
The original of this document is very large (18.8 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 9 AUGUST 2022
Page 10 of 103
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 9 AUGUST 2022
COUNCIL POLICY
Council recognises the need to support impacted communities while also conserving flying-foxes
and the critical ecological services they provide. This SoMI outlines how Council plans to manage
flying-fox populations and associated community impacts within the Noosa LGA.
Council is committed to conserving flying-foxes and natural areas, and therefore does not support
flying-fox dispersal or destruction of roosts. Dispersal is also extremely costly with unpredictable
outcomes, usually with only short-term results where flying-foxes re-establish the original roost and
often create additional new roosts in the process. Dispersal may be considered in extreme cases,
where there is a risk or significant impact that cannot be managed in other ways. Any management
will be implemented using a staged approach to ensure that costs and impacts to flying-foxes (and
other ecological values) are minimised.
Council will consider the following to decide what action is appropriate at a particular site:
- location of the roost and land tenure
- size, occupancy and history of the roost
+ community concerns
+ species present and timing of breeding
- ecological values including threatened fauna and/or flora species and communities
- cost of management actions
- risks associated with management
- the likelihood of management actions addressing community concerns
- latest information from researchers.
There are several actions that may be undertaken to manage conflict between flying-foxes and the
surrounding community, including education, regular monitoring, vegetation works, buffering
techniques (e.g. canopy-sprinkler systems) and subsidy programs. The level of conflict at each roost,
in combination with other site-specific factors, will guide the type of action undertaken. The figures
below provide an overview of this framework to guide flying-fox management decision-making.
Indicators of roost conflict level
Medium conflict High conflict
* No sensitive receptors within * Moderately sensitive * Highly sensitive receptor(s)
proximity of the roost receptor(s) within proximity of within proximity of the roost
+ Low number of flying-foxes the roost + Large number of flying-foxes
present * Medium number of flying- present, or consistent large
+ Low potential for roost to foxes present, with the seasonal influxes
expand potential for large influxes + High potential for roost to
« Low impact on surrounding + Moderate potential for roost expand
residential properties to expand — + High impact on residential
¢ Relatively large distance * Moderate impact on properties
between roost and residential residential properties * No or little distance between
properties * Moderate distance between roost and residential
roost and residential properties
properties
Page 4
Page 10 of 103See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.