Skip to the record
Accept no imitations.

Original source · versioned page text

Stormwater Management Plan

Attached to the e-mail REC16/0014 - Planning report & supporting management plans, contour plan 2 of 2.

of 19

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Plans and drawings

This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).

Log in to see the plans as drawn
SITE BASED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
                   For
     Elkhorn Investments (QLD) Pty Ltd


         Proposed Sub-division at
             28 Elkhorn Drive,
                 Tewantin




             Job Ref: SC- 5551


               March 2016
Log in to download the original file

Stormwater Management Plan.pdf · 899 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

Full text of the other 18 pages

Page 2

SC5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin                                                                       1



                                 AUTHORSHIP INFORMATION

                                               Site Based Stormwater
                          REPORT TITLE
                                               Management Plan
                          Affected
                          Properties
                          Street Address       28 Elkhorn Drive, Tewantin

                          RP Description       Lot 70 M37807
                          Prepared For         Elkhorn Investments (QLD) Pty Ltd
                          Date                 March 2016
                          Report Status        For DA Approval
                          Prepared By
                          Name                 Matt Johnson
                          Qualifications       BE (Civil)
                          Company              Empire Engineering Pty Ltd
                          Phone Number         07 5477 6437
                          Reviewed By
                          Name                 Sean Dwyer
                          Qualifications       BE (Civil)
                          Approved By
                          Name                 Troy Paulsen
                          Qualifications       BE (Civil), CPEng, RPEQ 6990




                          REVISION         DATE               Reviewed/ Approval

                                 A         21.03.16




Document Qualifying and Ownership Statement:
The contents of this document represent an assessment of the facts and circumstances pertaining to this
matter, as they are known to the writer at the time of preparation. It is possible that upon completion and
distribution of this document further information may come to hand that impact upon the findings,
recommendations or conclusions drawn in this document. This document and its contents remains the
property of Empire Engineering and cannot be reproduced in whole or in part for any reasons that could be
considered to be outside the exact, intended original use of this document.

Page 3

SC5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin                                                                                                           2




                                                TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0      Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3
   1.1        Background ......................................................................................................... 3
   1.2        Scope .................................................................................................................. 3
   1.3        Existing Topography ............................................................................................ 3
   1.4        Proposed Development........................................................................................ 4
2.0      Water Cycle Management ....................................................................................... 5
   2.1        Background ......................................................................................................... 5
   2.2        Wastewater Minimisation ..................................................................................... 5
   2.3        Stormwater Harvesting Tanks .............................................................................. 5
3.0      Water Quality Management .................................................................................... 6
   3.1        Background ......................................................................................................... 6
   3.2        Construction Phase.............................................................................................. 6
   3.3        Operational Phase ............................................................................................... 7
      3.3.1      Water Quality Objectives.................................................................................. 7
      3.3.2      Pollutant Export Modelling ............................................................................... 7
      3.3.2.1        Rainfall Data................................................................................................ 8
      3.3.2.2        Treatment Nodes ......................................................................................... 9
      3.3.3      Effectiveness in Pollution Reduction................................................................. 9
4.0      Stormwater Quantity Management....................................................................... 10
5.0      Conclusions .......................................................................................................... 11
APPENDIX A – STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN..................................................... 12
APPENDIX B – STORMWATER QUALITY MUSIC MODELLING ....................................... 13

Page 4

SC5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin                                                                          3




1.0 Introduction

1.1      Background
This report is to accompany and be considered part of an application to Noosa Council for a proposed sub-
division at 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin.


1.2      Scope
Empire Engineering Pty Ltd was commissioned by Elkhorn Investments (QLD) Pty Ltd to develop a site based
Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) to outline water management strategies for the proposed development
that will comply with Council’s relevant planning scheme policies, Queensland Development Code and the
Environmental Protection Act (1994) and associated Environmental Protection (Water) Policy 1997.


This report presents the results of a SWMP and outlines the proposed measures to be adopted in relation to
stormwater quality management and stormwater quantity management for the subject site and the proposed
development.


1.3      Existing Topography
The subject site is described as Lot 70 M37807 with a combined area of 12,938m2. The site is bounded by
Elkhorn Drive and existing residential allotments to the south, existing residential allotments to the west and
north, and Noosa River Esplanade to the east. The site is currently occupied by a single residential house with
an associated shed. The remainder of the lot is covered in grass and tree/shrubbery. See Figure 1.1.

Page 5

SC5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin                                                                     4




                            Subject Site:
                           28 Elkhorn Dr,
                              Tewantin


                                                                                                N

                                            Figure 1.1 Subject Site


The site has a crest approximately 45m off the eastern boundary on the southern end of the site, to
approximately 25m off the eastern boundary at the northern end of the site. This crest is at approximately
RL10.25. The site falls to the west at approximately 2.5% grade to almost RL8.25 in the south-western
corner. The site also falls to the east at approximately 18% to RL2.00 in the south-eastern corner. Under
existing conditions rainfall sheet flows from the site’s crest into either the Noosa River or the adjacent
residential property.


1.4      Proposed Development
Preliminary drawings prepared by KHA Development Managers depict a proposed 11 lot residential sub-
division and associated road.

Page 6

SC5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin                                                                           5




2.0 Water Cycle Management

2.1      Background
The purpose of this section of the SWMP is to outline water saving measures that will be implemented in
the design and construction of the proposed development.


2.2      Wastewater Minimisation
To reduce the impact of water demand from the development and to minimise the loading on the existing
sewerage network, it is intended to reduce the wastewater leaving the site through the use of “at source”
measures. This will include:
         Water saving shower roses with a AAA rating or better
         Dual flush toilet cisterns that do not exceed 6 litres on full flush and 3 litres on half flush
         The use of 3 star (or higher) water efficient appliances


2.3      Stormwater Harvesting Tanks
In an effort to reduce the demand on town water supply and to assist with meeting water quality objectives
for this development, it is proposed to incorporate stormwater harvesting tanks on each lot within the
hydraulic design of the proposed development. A total volume of 55,000L is proposed, with a minimum of
50% of the roof area to be connected with first flush diversion capabilities as determined using MUSIC
modelling to achieve water quality objectives, refer section 3.0.

Page 7

SC5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin                                                                       6




3.0 Water Quality Management
3.1      Background
A requirement of the proposed development is that Stormwater quality treatment shall be provided to meet
the design objectives set out in Section 2.4 of DERM’s Urban Stormwater Quality Planning guidelines 2010
and the associated with State Planning Policy (SPP) 4/10 Healthy Waters. The scope typically
encompasses the ‘post construction’ phase of the development however ‘construction phase’ water quality
is briefly addressed.


3.2      Construction Phase
Table 3.1 has been adapted from Table C4.1 of Brisbane City Council’s (BCC) Stormwater Best
Management Practices 2000 and details the typical stormwater pollutants which may be generated during
the construction phase of the development.


                      Pollutant                                     Sources

                         Litter                  Paper, construction packaging, food packaging,
                                                            cement bags and off-cuts

                     Sediment                   Unprotected exposed soils and stockpiles during
                                                            earthworks and building

                  Hydrocarbons                Fuel and oil spills, leaks from construction equipment

                  Toxic Materials            Cement slurry, solvents, cleaning agents, wash waters

             pH Altering Substances                       Cement slurry, wash waters

                                   Table 3.1 –Typical Construction Phase Pollutants



         The following measures should typically be implemented prior to the commencement of
         construction:

                  Education of all site workers in sediment and erosion procedures

                  Specified storage areas for construction materials and plant that are bunded to prevent
                  any spillages from escaping

Page 8

SC5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin                                                                     7


During the construction phase of the development, silt fences should be erected downstream of all
disturbed areas. In addition erosion and sediment control devices should be regularly inspected and
maintained following storm events. An Erosion and Sediment Control Plan will be provided as part of the
operational works application.



3.3      Operational Phase
During the operational stage of the development, the following impacts have been identified in relation to
stormwater runoff and water quality of the receiving waterways:
         Gross pollutants which include human derived litter, course sediment and vegetation
         Sediment and suspended solids
         Nutrients such as phosphorous and nitrogen
To target these potential pollutants stormwater quality improvement devices (SQID’s) are proposed to be
incorporated within the design.


3.3.1    Water Quality Objectives
The water quality objectives (WQO’s) for this site were determined in accordance with Appendix 2 of the
State Planning Policy (SPP) Dec 2013.


Table 3.2 indicates the minimum load reduction targets required to be met:


                                   Pollutant               Minimum Reduction Targets

                     Total Suspended Sediments (TSS)                   80%

                            Total Phosphorus (TP)                      60%

                              Total Nitrogen (TN)                      45%

                           Gross Pollutants (>5mm)                     90%

                                         Table 3.2 - Water Quality Objectives



3.3.2    Pollutant Export Modelling
The Model for Urban Stormwater Improvement Conceptualisation (MUSIC) has been utilised to calculate
pollutant loads from the proposed development and to predict performance characteristics of the proposed
treatment train. Modelling parameters used were adopted from the Water by Design “Music Modelling
Guidelines for South-East Queensland”, and the updated MUSIC Version 5 recommended parameters for
Bio-retention basin nodes. MUSIC modelling setup and results are attached within Appendix B.

Page 9

SC5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin                                                                                 8




Under the proposed conditions, the site was ‘split’ into three land use catchment nodes; the roofed area,
driveways and ground level uses. The pollutant export parameters utilised were based on the Urban
Residential pollutant loads, refer Table 3.3 & 3.4.


                       Parameter                                                      Value
                Rainfall threshold (mm)                                                1
              Soil storage capacity (mm)                                              500
              Initial storage (% capacity)                                             10
                  Field capacity (mm)                                                 200
          Infiltration capacity coefficient (a)                                       211
           Infiltration capacity exponent (b)                                          5.0
                   Initial depth (mm)                                                  50
                Daily recharge rate (%)                                                28
                Daily baseflow rate (%)                                                27
             Daily deep seepage rate (%)                                               0
                        Table 3.3 – Rainfall-runoff Parameters Adopted (Urban Residential)



                                              TSS Log                 TP Log                         TN Log
 Flow Type       Surface Type
                                      Mean        Std Dev.    Mean        Std Dev.            Mean       Std Dev.
                      Roof              N/A         N/A        N/A             N/A            N/A             N/A
  Baseflow
                   Driveways            1.00        0.34      -0.97            0.31           0.20            0.20
Parameters
                 Ground Level           1.00        0.39      -0.97            0.31           0.20            0.20
                      Roof              1.30        0.39      -0.89            0.31           0.26            0.23
 Stormflow
                   Driveways            2.43        0.39      -0.30            0.31           0.26            0.23
Parameters
                 Ground Level           2.18        0.39      -0.47            0.31           0.26            0.23
                         Table 3.4 – Pollutant Export Values Adopted (Urban Residential)



3.3.2.1 Rainfall Data
Rainfall data for the site was chosen to give the best representation of actual conditions. A time period of
10 years between 1973 and 1983 was selected from the Cooroy Composite station, using a six minute time
step.

Page 10

SC5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin                                                                        9




3.3.2.2 Treatment Nodes
The following devices have been used in the treatment train to reduce these pollutant loads to achieve WQO’s.


    Bio-Retention Basin – An area of 95m2 of designated Bio-retention to treat road, landscape, and roof
    catchments to achieve the WQO’s was modelled. An extended detention depth of 200mm with a filter
    media of 180mm/hr sandy loam hydraulic conductivity has been modelled. The location of these
    devices is shown on the attached Appendix A.


    Rainwater Tanks – A combined volume of 55,000L rainwater harvesting was modelled to receive 50%
    roofwater areas. This volume is to be re-used for irrigation purposes (excluding road reserve areas).
    Re-use rates for irrigation were calculated as follows: 5,167m 2 ground areas x 75% (areas to receive
    irrigation) x 0.548m annual irrigation, equating to 2,124kL/yr per the MUSIC Modelling Guidelines



3.3.3    Effectiveness in Pollution Reduction
The water quality development model was set up with the incorporation of the above devices to reduce
pollutant export to WQO levels. Table 3.5 indicates the predicted pollutant mean values of stormwater
discharged from the site as calculated by MUSIC:


                                   Pollutant              Percentage Load Reduction

                        Total Suspended Solids (TSS)                  83.2%

                            Total Phosphorus (TP)                     60.3%

                              Total Nitrogen (TN)                     56.2%

                           Gross Pollutants (>5mm)                    100%

                                   Table 3.5 - Flow Based Pollutant Load Reduction



The MUSIC modelling results shown above indicate that the treatment train will adequately treat TSS, TP
and TN generated by stormwater runoff in accordance with the targets required under the water quality
objectives stated previously.

Page 11

SC5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin                                                                      10




4.0 Stormwater Quantity Management

The subject site is located adjacent to the Noosa River Esplanade where a portion of the site currently
sheet flows into. This is deemed the lawful point of discharge for the subject site as no other practical
stormwater connection exists for the site. The site is directly adjacent to the point of discharge into the
Noosa River, resulting in a very small time of concentration for the proposed development compared to
that of any upstream catchments. On-site detention would therefore have no beneficial impact to peak flow
discharge rates. As such, no detention is proposed within the development.

Page 12

SC5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin                                                                       11




5.0 Conclusions
This report has outlined a total water cycle strategy to be adopted in the construction and operational
works phase of the development which satisfies the acceptable solutions set out in Councils planning
scheme policies.


         Wastewater minimisation strategies will be adopted to reduce the demand on Council’s existing
         infrastructure,
         Best practice and practical water quality improvement devices are proposed which include 55,000L
         of rainwater harvesting, and a Bio-retention basin area of 95m 2,
         Due to the site’s location adjacent to the point of discharge into Noosa River, no detention volume
         is proposed.

Page 13

SC5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin                      12




            APPENDIX A – STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN


[OCR of page images]
$C5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin

12

 

APPENDIX A — STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN

 

Page 14

                                                                                                                                                       LEGEND




          CONCEPT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN


EMP RE
                                  Bundaberg                              Gladstone                              Sunshine Coast
                                  9 Princess Street Bundaberg Qld        4 Goondoon Street Gladstone Qld        45 Brisbane Road Mooloolaba Qld
                                  PO Box 2052 Bundaberg Qld 4670         PO Box 1743 Gladstone DC Qld 4680      PO Box 102 Mooloolaba Qld 4557
                                  T: 07 4154 4894 F: 07 4154 4274        T: 07 4972 5387                        T: 07 5477 6437 F: 07 5444 4216
E N G I N E E R I NG              E: [email protected]   E: [email protected]   E: [email protected]
ACN 112761510   ABN 21112761510

Page 15

INSTALLATION                         MAINTENANCE                           2. REMOVE COLLECTED SEDIMENT AND     4. GRADE THE AREA AND SMOOTH IT OUT
                                                                           DISPOSE OF IN A SUITABLE MANNER      IN PREPARATION FOR STABILISATION.
1. REFER TO APPROVED PLANS FOR       1. INSPECT THE LEVEL SPREADER AFTER   THAT WILL NOT CAUSE AN EROSION OR
LOCATION, DIMENSIONS AND             EVERY RAINFALL EVENT UNTIL            POLLUTION HAZARD.                    5. STABILISE THE AREA AS SPECIFIED ON
CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. IF THERE ARE   VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED.                                                 THE APPROVED PLAN.
QUESTIONS OR PROBLEMS WITH THE                                             3. REMOVE AND APPROPRIATELY
LOCATION, DIMENSIONS, OR METHOD OF   2. AFTER ESTABLISHMENT OF             DISPOSE OF ANY EXPOSED GEOTEXTILE.
INSTALLATION CONTACT THE ENGINEER    VEGETATION OVER THE LEVEL
OR RESPONSIBLE ON-SITE OFFICER FOR   SPREADER, INSPECTIONS SHOULD BE
ASSISTANCE.                          MADE ON A REGULAR BASIS AND AFTER
                                     RUNOFF-PRODUCING RAINFALL.
2. WHEREVER PRACTICAL, LOCATE THE
LEVEL SPREADER ON UNDISTURBED,       3. ENSURE THAT THERE IS NO SOIL
STABLE SOIL.                         EROSION AND THAT SEDIMENT
                                     DEPOSITION IS NOT CAUSING THE
3. ENSURE FLOW DISCHARGING FROM      CONCENTRATION OF FLOW.
THE LEVEL SPREADER WILL DISPERSE
ACROSS A PROPERLY STABILISED SLOPE   4. ENSURE THAT THERE IS NO SOIL
NOT EXCEEDING 10:1 (H:V) AND         EROSION OR CHANNEL DAMAGE
SUFFICIENTLY EVEN IN GRADE ACROSS    UPSTREAM OF THE LEVEL SPREADER,
THE SLOPE TO AVOID CONCENTRATING     OR SOIL EROSION OR VEGETATION
THE OUTFLOW.                         DAMAGE DOWNSTREAM OF THE LEVEL
                                     SPREADER.
4. THE OUTLET SILL OF THE SPREADER
SHOULD BE PROTECTED WITH EROSION     5. INVESTIGATE THE SOURCE OF ANY
CONTROL MATTING TO PREVENT           EXCESSIVE SEDIMENTATION.
EROSION DURING THE ESTABLISHMENT
OF VEGETATION. THE MATTING SHOULD    6. MAINTAIN GRASS IN A HEALTH
                                                                                         (a) Typical layout of level spreader
BE A MINIMUM OF 1200mm WIDE          CONDITION WITH NO LESS THAN 90%
EXTENDING AT LEAST 300mm UPSTREAM    COVER UNLESS CURRENT WEATHER
OF THE EDGE OF THE OUTLET CREST      CONDITIONS REQUIRE OTHERWISE.
AND BURIED AT LEAST 150mm IN A
VERTICAL TRENCH. THE DOWNSTREAM      7. GRASS HEIGHT SHOULD BE
EDGE SHOULD BE SECURELY HELD IN      MAINTAINED AT A MINIMUM 50mm BLADE
PLACE WITH CLOSELY SPACED            LENGTH WITHIN THE LEVEL SPREADER
HEAVY-DUTY WIRE STAPLES AT LEAST     AND DOWNSTREAM DISCHARGE AREA,
150mm LONG.                          AND A MAXIMUM BLADE LENGTH NO
                                     GREATER THAN ADJACENT GRASSES.
5. ENSURE THAT THE OUTLET SILL
(CREST) IS LEVEL FOR THE SPECIFIED   REMOVAL
LENGTH.
                                     1. TEMPORARY LEVEL SPREADERS
6. IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONSTRUCTION,   SHOULD BE DECOMMISSIONED ONLY                    (b) Typical profile of the the outlet weir
TURF, OR SEED AND MULCH WHERE        AFTER AN ALTERNATIVE STABLE OUTLET
APPROPRIATE, THE LEVEL SPREADER.     IS OPERATIONAL, OR WHEN THE INFLOW
                                     CHANNEL IS DECOMMISSIONED.

Page 16

SC5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin                13




    APPENDIX B – STORMWATER QUALITY MUSIC MODELLING


[OCR of page images]
$C5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin 13

 

APPENDIX B —- STORMWATER QUALITY MUSIC MODELLING

 

Page 17

SC5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin                                                  14




                                   Figure B.1 – MUSIC Model Node Layout




                         Figure B.2 – MUSIC Model Treatment Train Effectiveness

Page 18

SC5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin                                               15




                               Figure B.3 – MUSIC Model ‘Bio-retention’ Node


[OCR of page images]
$C5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Figure B.3 — MUSIC Model ‘Bio-retention’ Node

A : — | |
| Properties of BIO A [= | | Lf (entiom]
Location * Products >>
(Inlet Properties ;— Lining Properties
Low Flow By-pass (cubic metres per sec) 0.000 Is Base Lined? Yes [| No
igh Fi bic metres 100.000
High Flow By-pass (cubic metres per sec) — Vegetation Proper
[oe coats © Vegetated with Effective Nutrient Removal Plants
Extended Detention Depth (metres) 0.30
Surface Area (square metres) 105.00 © Vegetated with Ineffective Nutrient Removal Plants
| Filter and Media Properties © Unvegetated
Filter Area (square metres) 95.00
Unlined Fier Media Perimeter (metres) 38.00 pe eoeates
Overflow Weir Width (metres) 2.40
Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity (mm/hour) 180.00
Fiter Depth (metres) 0.40 Underdrain Present? Yes [F] No
TN Content of Fitter Media (mg/kg) 400 Submerged Zone With Carbon Present? © Yes No
-| Orthophosphate Content of Filter Media (mg/kg) 50.0 a 0.00
| Depth 3,00
\~ Infiltration Properties
Exfitration Rate (mm/h) D0 | Fluxes... | | Notes... | | More |
| %concet || <P Back || WV Bish |
a eer mes seo eons sjmnfemspomy

 

 

Page 19

SC5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin                                                 16




                          Figure B.4 – MUSIC Model ‘Rainwater Harvesting’ Node


[OCR of page images]
$C5551 - 28 Elkhorn Dr, Tewantin

16

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

}—-+---->+-+--_—_—_—- ——1—..
Properties of Rainwater Tank [ la a)
Location | 5 Produets >>
;— Inlet Properties
Low Flow By-pass (cubic metres per sec) 0.000000
High Flow By-pass (cubic metres per sec) 100.000000
-— Individual Tank Properties
[=| Number of Tanks 1
‘Total Tank Properties
;~ Storage Properties
i Volume below overflow pipe (kL) 44.00
Depth above overflow (metres) 0.20
Surface Area (square metres) 275
Initial Volume (kL) 44.00
(Outlet Properties
Overflow Pipe Diameter (mm) 298
l [-) Use Custom Outflow and Storage Relationship
i | | Define Custom Outflow and Storage | Noi
| XK cancer || <r Back || A Bish |
SS

 

 

Figure B.4 — MUSIC Model ‘Rainwater Harvesting’ Node

 

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.