Council archive · source document
L06 Response to submissions · 132007.2446.03
Attached to the e-mail Consultants Response to Submissions - 132007.2446.03.
failed due to access. The Vet is open for business and is understood to be going well, whilst
the nursery closed when the former owners retired.
9. Future extension to the vet site – There is no basis to this comment and it is not relevant.
10. Fencing and upgrade to site have already been undertaken.- In response to a friendly chat
with the neighbours the applicant has advised that a high fence to act as an acoustic barrier
was suggested and agreed to. The applicant undertook this work clearing the remains of a
small rotted fence and weeds and installing a 2.1m high timber fence at their cost. This was
out of respect for the neighbour at the earliest possible moment and needed to be done
regardless of the application.
Other general maintenance including building repair and gardening to the site that was
required for general upkeep or upgrading has been and continues to be done and is not
relevant to the application.
11. Should move to the Junction and leave our quiet suburb alone/ Wrong location for a
backpackers as patrons have to walk from the Junction - Comments about a quiet suburb are
questioned as the site is located across from a school and motel and is near a busy
intersection.
The site is well located for backpackers as it is close to both north and south bus stops, has
good pedestrian and cycle paths and is in an easy walk to the Noosa Junction or the beach.
The Noosa Plan does not nominate any new areas in Noosa Junction for Visitor
Accommodation of any sort. Further the proposal seeks to amalgamate one adjoining lot
currently used for 3 units into any existing identified and approved Visitor Accommodation
site that has been operating for over 8 years. It is noted that the subject site and existing
hostel are located on the edge of the suburb of Sunshine Beach, are on a main road and are
similarly aligned with the other uses such as the Motel located across the road.
My client stresses that some of the accusations presented in the submitter’s letters raise spurious claims
about noise which have generally related to tenants of the existing units talking in their backyard. The
applicant has however carefully considered the matters raised in the submissions and wishes to advise
that they will undertake the following:
1. Night manager to have the Reception phone on them to answer from 9pm to midnight. From
midnight it will be diverted to a Security team response number.
2. Introduce a Night ‘security’ type person between 9pm and midnight to keep control of the
ambient noise levels potential.
3. Remove all seating from the rear of Unit 3.
Please contact me at our Sunshine Coast office if you have any queries or require any further
information.
Yours faithfully,
Nadine Gorton
Senior Planner
martoo consulting pty ltd
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
L06 Response to submissions.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 337 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.