Original source · versioned page text
2019-06-17 General Committee Meeting Notes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
RECOMMENDATIONS ONLY – NOT THE FINAL DECISION OF COUNCIL
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 17 JUNE 2019
(v) The proposed development does not respect the scale and character of the
surrounding development.
3. The proposed development is contrary to the Specific Outcomes of the Noosa
Heads Locality Code for population density, gross floor area, site cover, building
height and setbacks.
4. The proposed development is contrary to the Biodiversity Overlay Code as the
proposal does not satisfactorily manage, minimise or mitigate its impact’s on the
site’s ecologically important areas, ecological linkages for the koala population
and the site’s watercourse with the development resulting in excessive clearing
of protected vegetation.
5. The proposed subdivision is contrary to the Reconfiguring a Lot Code as:
(i) The proposed lots and lot boundaries fragment the site’s wildlife corridor
and the riparian buffer to the site’s watercourse.
(ii) The proposal is to subdivide land in the Open Space Conservation zone.
(iii) The applicant has not demonstrated appropriate access for Lot 3 for
construction purposes is available or achievable.
(iv) The proposed parkland lot, Lot 4, includes part of the bushfire protection
zone for the multiple dwelling units and steep slopes, which will require
ongoing monitoring and future management, inappropriately burdening
Council’s resources.
6. The proposed development has not been designed to avoid any potential
instability and associated problems and seeks to clear excessive vegetation that
assists in stabilising the site and the development in the long term contrary to the
Natural Hazards Overlay Code and Reconfiguring a Lot Code.
7. The proposed development will adversely impact on the vegetated character of
the adjoining pedestrian path in Edgar Bennett Avenue road reserve enjoyed by
residents and visitors to the area due to the scale and extent of development
proposed along this boundary and limited landscape opportunities to screen the
development. The proposed works for the driveway and associated retaining
walls are also likely to adversely impact on the vegetation within the road reserve
and result in the removal of some existing mature vegetation.
8. The proposed stormwater management strategies for water quality for the
multiple housing development on lot 1 conflict with the Water Sensitive Design
Code, which requires natural treatment strategies and systems and are contrary
to the Reconfiguring a Lot Code.
9. The proposed proprietary device has not been accepted by Stormwater Australia
as a satisfactory water quality treatment system for this area. Therefore, the
proposed development may adversely impact on the downstream ecosystem due
to changes in water quality.
10. The proposed development is contrary to the draft Noosa Plan provisions, which
reinforce the current Noosa Plan’s requirements to protect the site’s
environmental values and appropriately respond to the site’s natural hazards.
11. The application attracted a considerable number of public submissions raising
valid grounds of objection to the development.
B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
Carried.
Page 10 of 13
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.