MCU14/0068 Town Planning Report (attachment 4 of 10)

5.2     State Development Assessment Provisions
The State Assessment and Referral Agency (SARA) became active on 1 July 2013. A
review of the SARA mapping illustrates the following SARA layers as being
applicable:

       The site is within a Fish Habitat Area (QLD waterways for waterway
        barrier works – Low);
       The site is within a water resources planning area boundary;
       The site is within the coastal zone;
       The site is within a Koala Conservation area (Koala assessable development
        area); and
       The site is within a Native Vegetation Clearing area – Category B.

The proposal is consistent with the abovementioned layers for the following reasons:

       The proposal will not comprise any works related to the identified Fish Habitat
        Area;
       The proposal does not seek to take or interfere with water;
       The site is within the coastal zone, however it is not within the coastal
        management district and therefore the provisions relating to coastal hazard
        areas do not apply;
       The proposal will be related to land identified as being a Koala assessable
        development area. However, the proposal will not relate to the list of
        assessable development as per Table 7, Column 1 of the SEQ Koala
        Conservation State Planning Regulatory Provisions. As such, no further
        assessment is required;
       The site is within a Native Vegetation Clearing area (albeit of least concern)
        however, the proposal will not comprise the clearing of any significant
        vegetation. As such, no further assessment is required.

The proposal is considered to be consistent with the relevant State Development
Assessment Provisions.


5.3     SEQ Regional Plan 2009-2031
The site is within the Regional Landscape and Rural Production Area designation of
the SEQ Regional Plan (SEQRP). As such, Division 2 Material Change of Use of the
SEQRP State Planning Regulatory Provisions applies as the site is outside of the Urban
Footprint.

The proposal is considered to be defined as outdoor recreation which relates to a
recreation or sports activity which ‘has a direct connection to the rural, natural or
resource value of the premises, is carried on outside of a building and requires areas
of open space’. Table 2A refers a Sport and recreation activity outside the Urban



   August 2014                  Keith Hill – Golf Course Extension                 Page 10
                          2 Goldburg Court & 16 Goldburg Court, Noosaville