Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Original source · versioned page text

MCU RALReport (002)

of 12

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

7.6 Works Code

The reconfiguration complies with the Works Codes. A Development Application for
Operational Works will be submitted for assessment following approval of the Reconfiguration
of a Lot application.

8. INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES

Whilst the development creates an additional Lot, there is no additional development or
demand upon community facilities or services.

Therefore it is deemed that no Infrastructure Charges are payable.

9. CONCLUSIONS

This Development Assessment Report has been prepared to accompany Development
Application for Material Change of Use and for Reconfiguring a Lot submitted on behalf of
The Corporation of the Synod of the Diocese of Brisbane.

The site is located within the Community Facilities Zone and in the Hinterland Villages Local
Plan of the Noosa Plan 2020.

The proposal comprises the subdivision of 1 Lot to create 2; that is consistent with the current
uses on the site.

The development complies with all relevant Performance Outcomes of the Codes in the
Noosa Plan 2020.

The subdivision is appropriate given that:

° All proposed residential Lot include an area of at least 1,000m?.

e The proposed development complies with the Overall Outcomes of the Hinterland
Villages Local Plan Code.

e The proposed development complies with the Overall Outcomes of the Community
Facilities Zone Code.

e The proposed development complies with the Overall Outcomes of the Low Density
Housing Code.

e The proposed development complies with the Overall Outcomes of the Reconfiguring
a Lot Code.

¢ The proposed development is consistent with the site’s designation of Urban
Footprint in the South East Queensland Regional Plan.

e The development complies with the relevant parts of the State Planning Policy.

e The proposed development complies with the relevant parts of the State
Development Assessment Provisions.

Therefore, it is considered that the proposed development warrants approval from Council
subject to the imposition of reasonable and relevant conditions.

Max Watterson

 
Log in to download the original file

MCU RALReport (002).pdf · 2.5 MB (large file)

Large file: the download may take up to a minute.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.