Council archive · source document
SDAP Code Assessment · MCU18/0084
Attached to the e-mail Visitor Accommodation Type 3 Rural (6 cabins) - MCU18/0084.
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment
Table 1.2.1: Development in a state-controlled road environment
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Buildings and structures
PO1 The location of buildings, structures, infrastructure, AO1.1 Buildings, structures, infrastructure, services and Complies
services and utilities does not create a safety hazard in a utilities are not located in a state-controlled road. No buildings, structures, infrastructure, services or utilities
state-controlled road, or cause damage to, or obstruct road AND are located in a state-controlled road.
transport infrastructure AO1.2 Buildings, structures, infrastructure, services and Complies
utilities can be maintained without requiring access to a Buildings, structures, infrastructure, services or utilities can
state-controlled road. be maintained without requiring access to a state-controlled
road.
PO2 The design and construction of Buildings and AO2.1 Facades of buildings and structures facing a state- Complies
structures does not create a safety hazard by distracting controlled road are made of non-reflective materials. The building materials are non-reflective and buildings will
users of a state-controlled road. OR be setback more than 280m from the state-controlled road.
AO2.2 Facades of buildings and structures do not reflect Complies
point light sources into the face of oncoming traffic on a The buildings will be setback 280m from the state-
state-controlled road. controlled road.
AND
AO2.3 External lighting of buildings and structures is not Complies
directed into the face of oncoming traffic on a state- No external lighting proposed.
controlled road and does not involve flashing or laser lights.
AND
AO2.4 Advertising devices visible from a state-controlled Not applicable
road are located and designed in accordance with the No advertising devices proposed.
Roadside advertising guide, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 1 of 24
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 23 pages
Page 2
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO3 Road, pedestrian and bikeway bridges over a state- AO3.1 Road, pedestrian and bikeway bridges over a state- Not applicable
controlled road are designed and constructed to prevent controlled road include throw protection screens in No road, pedestrian or bikeway bridges proposed.
projectiles from being thrown onto a state-controlled road. accordance with section 4.9.3 of the Design criteria for
bridges and other structures manual, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2014.
Filling, excavation and retaining structures
PO4 Filling and excavation does not interfere with, or result No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable
in damage to, infrastructure or services in a state-controlled No filling or excavation proposed.
road.
Note: Information on the location of services and public
utility plants in a state-controlled road can be obtained
from the Dial Before You Dig service.
Where development will impact on an existing or future
service or public utility plant in a state-controlled road such
that the service or public utility plant will need to be
relocated, the alternative alignment must comply with the
standards and design specifications of the relevant service
or public utility provider, and any costs of relocation are to
be borne by the developer.
PO5 Filling, excavation, building foundations and retaining No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable
structures do not undermine, or cause subsidence of, a No retaining walls, filling or excavation proposed.
state-controlled road.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 2 of 24
Page 3
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance
outcome, it is recommended an RPEQ certified geotechnical
assessment, prepared in accordance with Volume 3 of the
Road Planning And Design Manual 2nd edition, Department
of Transport and Main Roads, 2016, is provided.
PO6 Filling, excavation, building foundations and retaining No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable
structures do not cause ground water disturbance in a No retaining walls, filling or excavation proposed.
state-controlled road.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance
outcome, it is recommended an RPEQ certified geotechnical
assessment, prepared in accordance with Volume 3 of the
nd
Road planning and design manual 2 edition, Department
of Transport and Main Roads, 2016, is provided.
PO7 Excavation, boring, piling, blasting or fill compaction No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable
during construction of a development does not result in No filling or excavation proposed.
ground movement or vibration impacts that would cause
damage or nuisance to a state-controlled road, road
transport infrastructure or road works.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance
outcome, it is recommended an RPEQ certified geotechnical
assessment, prepared in accordance with Volume 3 of the
nd
Road Planning And Design Manual 2 edition, Department
of Transport and Main Roads, 2016, is provided.
PO8 Development involving the haulage of fill, extracted AO8.1 Fill, extracted material and spoil material is not Not applicable
material or excavated spoil material exceeding 10,000 transported to or from the development site on a state- No filling or excavation proposed.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 3 of 24
Page 4
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
tonnes per year does not damage the pavement of a state- controlled road.
controlled road.
Note: It is recommended a pavement impact assessment is
provided in accordance with the Guide to Traffic Impact
Assessment, Department of Transport and Main Roads,
2017.
PO9 Filling and excavation associated with the construction No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable
of vehicular access to a development does not compromise No filling or excavation proposed.
the operation or capacity of existing drainage infrastructure
for a state-controlled road.
PO10 Fill material used on a development site does not AO10.1 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid Not applicable
result in contamination of a state-controlled road. sulfate content. No filling proposed.
Note: Soils and rocks should be tested in accordance with
AS 1289.0 – Methods of testing soils for engineering
purposes and AS 4133.0-2005 – Methods of testing rocks
for engineering purposes.
AND
AO10.2 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with Not applicable
the requirements of AS 1289.0 2000 – Methods of testing No filling proposed.
soils for engineering purposes.
PO11 Filling and excavation does not cause wind-blown AO11.1 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with Not applicable
dust nuisance in a state-controlled road. the requirements of AS 1289.0 2000 – Methods of testing No filling proposed.
soils for engineering purposes.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 4 of 24
Page 5
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO11.2 Dust suppression measures are used during filling Not applicable
and excavation activities such as wind breaks or barriers and No filling or excavation proposed.
dampening of ground surfaces.
Stormwater and drainage
PO12 Development does not result in an actionable No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies
nuisance, or worsening of, stormwater, flooding or drainage The proposed development will not discharge stormwater
impacts in a state-controlled road. to the state controlled road.
PO13 Run-off from the development site is not unlawfully AO13.1 Development does not create any new points of Complies
discharged to a state-controlled road. discharge to a state-controlled road. No new points of discharge to the state controlled road are
AND proposed.
AO13.2 Stormwater run-off is discharged to a lawful point Complies
of discharge. Any stormwater will be discharged to the waterways on site
and will not impact on the state controlled road.
Note: Section 3.4 of the Queensland Urban Drainage
Manual, Department of Energy and Water Supply, 2013,
provides further information on lawful points of discharge.
AND
AO13.3 Development does not worsen the condition of an Complies
existing lawful point of discharge to the state-controlled The proposed development will not discharge water to the
road. state controlled road.
PO14 Run-off from the development site during AO14.1 Run-off from the development site during Complies
construction does not cause siltation of stormwater construction is not discharged to stormwater infrastructure No stormwater will be discharged to the state controlled
infrastructure affecting a state-controlled road. for a state-controlled road. road.
Vehicular access to a state-controlled road
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 5 of 24
Page 6
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO15 Vehicular access to a state-controlled road that is a AO15.1 Development does not require new or changed Complies
limited access road is consistent with government policy for access to a limited access road. The existing access arrangements will be maintained.
the management of limited access roads.
Note: Limited access roads are declared by the transport
chief executive under section 54 of the Transport
Infrastructure Act 1994 and are identified in the DA
mapping system.
OR
AO15.2 A new or changed access to a limited access road is Not applicable
consistent with the limited access policy for the state- No new access or changes to the access point are proposed.
controlled road.
Note: Limited access policies for limited access roads
declared under the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 can be
obtained by contacting the relevant Department of
Transport and Main Roads regional office.
AND
AO15.3 Where a new or changed access is for a service Not applicable
centre, access is consistent with the Service centre policy,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013 and the
Access policy for roadside service centre facilities on limited
access roads, Department of Transport and Main Roads,
2013, and the Service centre strategy for the state-
controlled road.
Note: The Service centre policy, Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2013, Access policy for roadside service
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 6 of 24
Page 7
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
centre facilities, Department of Transport and Main Roads,
2013 and the relevant Service centre strategy for a state-
controlled road can be accessed by contacting the relevant
Department of Transport and Main Roads regional office.
PO16 The location and design of vehicular access to a state- AO16.1 Vehicular access is provided from a local road. Not applicable
controlled road (including access to a limited access road) The existing access will be maintained from Pomona Kin Kin
does not create a safety hazard for users of a state- Road.
controlled road or result in a worsening of operating OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply:
conditions on a state-controlled road.
AO16.2 Vehicular access for the development is consistent Complies
Note: Where a new or changed access between the with the function and design of the state-controlled road. Given the minor nature of the proposed development and
premises and a state-controlled road is proposed, the AND the relatively small amount of traffic it will generate it is
Department of Transport and Main Roads will need to considered to be consistent with the function and design of
assess the proposal to determine if the vehicular access for the state controlled road.
the development is safe. An assessment can be made by AO16.3 Development does not require new or changed Complies
Department of Transport and Main Roads as part of the access between the premises and the state-controlled road. No change to the exiting, long established, access to the
development assessment process and a decision under state controlled road is proposed.
section 62 of Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 issued. Note: A decision under section 62 of the Transport
Infrastructure Act 1994 outlines the approved conditions for
use of an existing vehicular access to a state-controlled
road. Current section 62 decisions can be obtained from the
relevant Department of Transport and Main Roads regional
office.
AND
AO16.4 Use of any existing vehicular access to the The existing access is long established. It is considered that
development is consistent with a decision under section 62 the scale of traffic generated by the proposed use will not
of the Transport Infrastructure Act 1994. have an adverse impact on the safe operation of the state
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 7 of 24
Page 8
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
controlled road.
Note: The development which is the subject of the
application must be of an equivalent use and intensity for
which the section 62 approval was issued and the section 62
approval must have been granted no more than 5 years
prior to the lodgement of the application.
AND
AO16.5 Onsite vehicle circulation is designed to give priority Complies
to entering vehicles at all times so vehicles do not queue in The existing access allows for vehicles entering the property
a road intersection or on the state-controlled road. to do so without queuing.
PO17 Vehicular access to a state-controlled road or local AO17.1 Vehicular access and associated road access works Not applicable
road (and associated road access works) are located and are not located within 5 metres of existing public passenger
designed to not damage or interfere with public passenger transport infrastructure.
transport infrastructure, public passenger services or AND
pedestrian or cycle access to public passenger transport AO17.2 The location and design of vehicular access for a Not applicable
infrastructure and public passenger services. development does not necessitate the relocation of existing
public passenger transport infrastructure.
AND
AO17.3 On-site vehicle circulation is designed to give Not applicable
priority to entering vehicles at all times so vehicles using a
vehicular access do not obstruct public passenger transport
infrastructure and public passenger services or obstruct
pedestrian or cycle access to public passenger transport
infrastructure and public passenger services.
AND
AO17.4 The normal operation of public passenger transport Not applicable
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 8 of 24
Page 9
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
infrastructure or public passenger services is not interrupted
during construction of the development.
Vehicular access to local roads within 100 metres of an intersection with a state-controlled road
PO18 The location and design of vehicular access to a local AO18.1 Vehicular access is located as far as possible from Not applicable
road within 100 metres of an intersection with a state- the state-controlled road intersection.
controlled road does not create a safety hazard for users of AND
a state-controlled road. AO18.2 Vehicular access is in accordance with volume 3, Not applicable
parts, 3, 4 and 4A of the Road Planning And Design Manual,
2nd edition, Department of Transport and Main Roads,
2016.
AND
AO18.3 Onsite vehicle circulation is designed to give priority Not applicable
to entering vehicles at all times so vehicles do not queue in
the intersection or on the state-controlled road.
Planned upgrades
PO19 Development does not impede delivery of planned AO19.1 Development is not located on land identified by Not applicable
upgrades of state-controlled roads. the Department of Transport and Main Roads as land
required for the planned upgrade of a state-controlled road.
Note: Land required for the planned upgrade of a state-
controlled road is identified in the DA mapping system.
OR
AO19.2 Development is sited and designed so that Not applicable
permanent buildings, structures, infrastructure, services or
utilities are not located on land identified by the
Department of Transport and Main Roads as land required
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 9 of 24
Page 10
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
for the planned upgrade of a state-controlled road.
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply:
AO19.3 Structures and infrastructure located on land
identified by the Department of Transport and Main Roads Not applicable
as land required for the planned upgrade of a state-
controlled road are able to be readily relocated or removed
without materially affecting the viability or functionality of
the development.
AND
AO19.4 Vehicular access for the development is consistent Not applicable
with the function and design of the planned upgrade of the
state-controlled road.
AND
AO19.5 Development does not involve filling and excavation Not applicable
of, or material changes to, land required for a planned
upgrade to a state-controlled road.
AND
AO19.6 Land is able to be reinstated to the pre- Not applicable
development condition at the completion of the use.
Network impacts
PO20 Development does not result in a worsening of No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Complies
operating conditions on the state-controlled road network. Minimal additional traffic will be generated by the proposal.
A traffic impact assessment is considered onerous given the
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance low traffic generation of the development.
outcome, it is recommended that an RPEQ certified traffic
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 10 of 24
Page 11
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
impact assessment is provided, prepared in accordance with
the Guide to Traffic Impact Assessment, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
PO21 Development does not impose traffic loadings on a AO21.1 The layout and design of the development directs Not applicable
state-controlled road which could be accommodated on the traffic generated by the development to the local road There is no option to direct traffic to the local road network.
local road network. network.
PO22 Upgrade works on, or associated with, a state- AO22.1 Upgrade works required as a result of the Not applicable
controlled road are built in accordance with Queensland development are designed and constructed in accordance Given the minor nature of the proposal no upgrade works
nd
road design standards. with the Road planning and design manual, 2 edition, are considered necessary.
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2016.
Note: Road works in a state-controlled road require
approval under section 33 of the Transport Infrastructure
Act 1994 before the works commence.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 11 of 24
Page 12
Table 1.2.2: Environmental emissions
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Noise
Accommodation activities
PO23 Development involving an accommodation activity or AO23.1 A noise barrier or earth mound is provided which is Not applicable
land for a future accommodation activity minimises noise designed, sited and constructed: The proposed cabins are setback more than 280m from the
intrusion from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal 1. to meet the following external noise criteria at all state controlled road. Given the setback distance it is
corridor in habitable rooms. facades of the building envelope: considered that a noise barrier or earth mound is not
required to provide acoustic attenuation for road traffic
a. ≤ 60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) noise.
façade corrected (measured
L90 (8 hour) free field
between 10pm and 6am
≤ 40 dB(A))
b. ≤ 63 dB(A) L10 (18 hour)
façade corrected (measured
L90 (8 hour) free field
between 10pm and 6am
> 40 dB(A))
2. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise
barrier design of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice – Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 12 of 24
Page 13
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified noise
assessment report is provided, prepared in accordance with
the State Development Assessment Provisions Supporting
Information – Community Amenity (Noise), Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2013.
If the building envelope is unknown, the deemed-to-comply
setback distances for buildings stipulated by the local
planning instrument or relevant building regulations should
be used.
In some instances the design of noise barriers and mounds
to achieve the noise criteria above the ground floor may not
be reasonable or practicable. In these instances, any
relaxation of the criteria is at the discretion of the
Department of Transport and Main Roads.
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply:
AO23.2 Buildings which include a habitable room are Complies
setback the maximum distance possible from a state- Sufficient setbacks are provided to the state-controlled road
controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor. to ensure that traffic noise from Pomona Kin Kin Road will
AND not have an adverse impact on the amenity of visitors using
the cabins.
AO23.3 Buildings are designed and oriented so that Not applicable
habitable rooms are located furthest from a state-controlled Sufficient setbacks are provided to the state-controlled
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor. road.
AND
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 13 of 24
Page 14
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO23.4 Buildings (other than a relevant residential building Not applicable
or relocated building) are designed and constructed using Sufficient setbacks are provided to the state-controlled road
materials which ensure that habitable rooms meet the to mitigate any potential noise impact from traffic using
following internal noise criteria: Pomona Kin Kin Road. .
1. ≤ 35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour over 24
hours).
Statutory note: Noise levels from a state-controlled road or
type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in
accordance with AS1055.1–1997 Acoustics – Description and
measurement of environmental noise.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified noise
assessment report is provided, prepared in accordance with
the State Development Assessment Provisions Supporting
Information – Community Amenity (Noise), Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2013.
Habitable rooms of relevant residential buildings located
within a transport noise corridor must comply with the
Queensland Development Code MP4.4 Buildings in a
transport noise corridor, Queensland Government, 2015.
Transport noise corridors are mapped on the DA mapping
system.
PO24 Development involving an accommodation activity or AO24.1 A noise barrier or earth mound is provided which is Not applicable
land for a future accommodation activity minimises noise designed, sited and constructed: The proposed cabins are setback more than 280m from the
intrusion from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal 1. to meet the following external noise criteria in state controlled road. Given the setback distance it is
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 14 of 24
Page 15
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
corridor in outdoor spaces for passive recreation. outdoor spaces for passive recreation: considered that a noise barrier or earth mound is not
required to provide acoustic attenuation for road traffic
a. ≤ 57 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free noise.
field (measured L90 (18 hour)
free field between 6am and
12 midnight ≤ 45 dB(A))
b. ≤ 60 dB(A) L10 (18 hour) free
field (measured L90 (18 hour)
free field between 6am and
12 midnight > 45 dB(A))
2. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise
barrier design of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice – Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified noise
assessment report is provided, prepared in accordance with
the State Development Assessment Provisions Supporting
Information – Community Amenity (Noise), Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2013.
OR
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 15 of 24
Page 16
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO24.2 Each dwelling has access to an outdoor space for Complies
passive recreation which is shielded from a state-controlled The setbacks to the state controlled road will provide
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor by a building, solid sufficient separation between the amenity areas and any
gap-free fence, or other solid gap-free structure. potential road traffic noise to avoid the need for further
AND mitigation measures. .
AO24.3 Each dwelling with a balcony directly exposed to Complies
noise from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal As above.
corridor has a continuous solid gap-free balustrade (other
than gaps required for drainage purposes to comply with
the Building Code of Australia).
Child care centres
PO25 Development involving a: AO25.1 A noise barrier or earth mound is provided which is Not applicable
designed, sited and constructed:
1. child care centre; or 1. to meet the following external noise criteria at all
2. educational establishment facades of the building envelope:
a. ≤ 58 dB(A) L10 (1 hour)
minimises noise intrusion from a state-controlled road or
type 1 multi-modal corridor in indoor education areas and façade corrected (maximum
indoor play areas. hour during normal opening
hours)
2. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise
barrier design of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice – Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 16 of 24
Page 17
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified noise
assessment report is provided, prepared in accordance with
the State Development Assessment Provisions Supporting
Information – Community Amenity (Noise), Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2013.
If the building envelope is unknown, the deemed-to-comply
setback distances for buildings stipulated by the local
planning instrument or relevant building regulations should
be used.
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply:
AO25.2 Buildings which include indoor education areas and
indoor play areas are setback the maximum distance Not applicable
possible from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal
corridor.
AND
AO25.3 Buildings are designed and oriented so that indoor Not applicable
education areas and indoor play areas are located furthest
from the state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal
corridor.
AND
AO25.4 Buildings are designed and constructed using Not applicable
materials which ensure indoor education areas and indoor
play areas meet the following internal noise criteria:
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 17 of 24
Page 18
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
1. ≤ 35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during
opening hours).
Statutory note: Noise levels from a state-controlled road or
type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in
accordance with AS1055.1–1997 Acoustics – Description and
measurement of environmental noise.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified noise
assessment report, prepared in accordance with the State
Development Assessment Provisions Supporting
Information – Community Amenity (Noise), Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2013, is provided.
PO26 Development involving a: AO26.1 A noise barrier or earth mound is provided which is Not applicable
1. child care centre; or designed, sited and constructed:
2. educational establishment 1. to meet the following external noise criteria in each
minimises noise intrusion from a state-controlled road or outdoor education area or outdoor play area:
type 1 multi-modal corridor in outdoor education areas and
outdoor play areas. a. ≤ 63 dB(A) L10 (12 hour) free
field (between 6am and
6pm)
2. in accordance with chapter 7 integrated noise
barrier design of the Transport Noise Management
Code of Practice – Volume 1 Road Traffic Noise,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 18 of 24
Page 19
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified noise
assessment report is provided, prepared in accordance with
the State Development Assessment Provisions Supporting
Information – Community Amenity (Noise), Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2013.
OR
AO26.2 Each outdoor education area and outdoor play area Not applicable
is shielded from noise generated from a state-controlled
road or type 1 multi-modal corridor by a building, solid
gap-free fence, or other solid gap-free structure.
Hospitals
PO27 Development involving a hospital minimises noise AO27.1 Hospitals are designed and constructed using Not applicable
intrusion from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal materials which ensure patient care areas meet the
corridor in patient care areas. following internal noise criteria:
1. ≤ 35 dB(A) Leq (1 hour) (maximum hour during
opening hours).
Statutory note: Noise levels from a state-controlled road or
type 1 multi-modal corridor are to be measured in
accordance with AS1055.1–1997 Acoustics – Description and
measurement of environmental noise.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified noise
assessment report is provided, prepared in accordance with
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 19 of 24
Page 20
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
the State Development Assessment Provisions Supporting
Information – Community Amenity (Noise), Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2013.
Vibration
Hospitals
PO28 Development involving a hospital minimises vibration AO28.1 Hospitals are designed and constructed to ensure Not applicable
impacts from vehicles using a state-controlled road or vibration in the treatment area of a patient care area does
1.75
type 1 multi-modal corridor in patient care areas. not exceed a vibration dose value of 0.1m/s .
AND
AO28.2 Hospitals are designed and constructed to ensure Not applicable
vibration in the ward area of a patient care area does not
1.75
exceed a vibration dose value of 0.4m/s .
Note: To demonstrate compliance with the acceptable
outcome, it is recommended that a RPEQ certified vibration
assessment report is provided.
Air and light
PO29 Development involving an accommodation activity AO29.1 Each dwelling has access to an outdoor space for Complies
minimises air quality impacts from a state-controlled road passive recreation which is shielded from a state-controlled Farming experiences are proposed on the site for visitors.
or type 1 multi-modal corridor in outdoor spaces for passive road or type 1 multi-modal corridor by a building, solid
recreation. gap-free fence, or other solid gap-free structure.
PO30 Development involving a: AO30.1 Each outdoor education area and outdoor play area Not applicable
1. child care centre; or is shielded from a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-
2. educational establishment modal corridor by a building, solid gap-free fence, or other
minimises air quality impacts from a state-controlled road solid gap-free structure.
or type 1 multi-modal corridor in outdoor education areas
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 20 of 24
Page 21
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
and outdoor play areas.
PO31 Development involving an accommodation activity AO31.1 Buildings for an accommodation activity or hospital Complies
or hospital minimises lighting impacts from a state- are designed to minimise the number of windows or Minimal windows are provided to buildings which address
controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor. transparent/translucent panels facing a state-controlled road or the state-controlled road and the nearest building is setback
type 1 multi-modal corridor. 285m from the road.
OR
AO31.2 Windows facing a state-controlled road or type 1 Not applicable
multi-modal corridor include treatments to block light from
a state-controlled road or type 1 multi-modal corridor.
Table 1.2.3: Development in a future state-controlled road environment
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
PO32 Development does not impede delivery of a future AO32.1 Development is not located in a future state- Not applicable
state-controlled road. controlled road.
OR
AO32.2 Development is sited and designed so that Not applicable
permanent buildings, structures, infrastructure, services or
utilities are not located in a future state-controlled road.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 21 of 24
Page 22
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply:
AO32.3 Structures and infrastructure located in a future
state-controlled road are able to be readily relocated or Not applicable
removed without materially affecting the viability or
functionality of the development.
AND
AO32.4 Development does not involve filling and excavation Not applicable
of, or material changes to, a future state-controlled road.
AND
AO32.5 Land is able to be reinstated to the pre- Not applicable
development condition at the completion of the use.
PO33 Vehicular access to a future state-controlled road is AO33.1 Development does not require new or changed Not applicable
located and designed to not create a safety hazard for users access between the premises and a future state-controlled
of a future state-controlled road or result in a worsening of road.
operating conditions on a future state-controlled road. AND
AO33.2 Vehicular access for the development is consistent Not applicable
Note: Where a new or changed access between the with the function and design of the future state-controlled
premises and a future state-controlled road is proposed, the road.
Department of Transport and Main Roads will need to
assess the proposal to determine if the vehicular access for
the development is safe. An assessment can be made by
Department of Transport and Main Roads as part of the
development assessment process and a decision under
section 62 of Transport Infrastructure Act 1994 issued.
PO34 Filling, excavation, building foundations and retaining No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable
structures do not undermine, or cause subsidence of, a
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 22 of 24
Page 23
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
future state-controlled road.
Note: To demonstrate compliance with this performance
outcome, it is recommended that an RPEQ certified
geotechnical assessment is provided, prepared in
accordance with volume 3 of the Road planning and design
manual, 2nd edition, Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2016.
PO35 Fill material from a development site does not result AO35.1 Fill material is free of contaminants including acid Not applicable
in contamination of land for a future state-controlled road. sulfate content.
Note: Soil and rocks should be tested in accordance with
AS1289 – Methods of testing soils for engineering purposes
and AS4133 2005 – Methods of testing rocks for
engineering purposes.
AND
AO35.2 Compaction of fill is carried out in accordance with Not applicable
the requirements of AS1289.0 2000 – Methods of testing
soils for engineering purposes.
PO36 Development does not result in an actionable No acceptable outcome is prescribed. Not applicable
nuisance, or worsening of, stormwater, flooding or drainage
impacts in a future state-controlled road.
PO37 Run-off from the development site is not unlawfully AO37.1 Development does not create any new points of Not applicable
discharged to a future state-controlled road. discharge to a future state-controlled road.
AND
AO37.2 Stormwater run-off is discharged to a lawful point Not applicable
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 23 of 24
Page 24
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
of discharge.
Note: Section 3.4 of the Queensland Urban Drainage
Manual, Department of Energy and Water Supply, 2013,
provides further information on lawful points of discharge.
AND
AO37.3 Development does not worsen the condition of an Not applicable
existing lawful point of discharge to the future state-
controlled road.
State Development Assessment Provisions – version 2.1
State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment Page 24 of 24
Used in these records
SDAP Code Assessment.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 278 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.