Original source · versioned page text
2019-06-11 S&O Committee Agenda - Item 19 - Attachment 1 - Community Satisfaction Survey Noosa Shire Council 2019
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Theme 3: Managing the Shire IMPORTANCE
TOTAL Crucial Import. Nice Not Quite Don't Not Noosa LGAQ Noosa
to very Un- Know App. Mean Mean Mean
have Import. Import 2019 2017 2017
Town Planning 400 42.3% 49.0% 5.3% 1.3% 0.3% 2.0% 0.0% 4.34 4.31 4.39
Building Control 400 43.3% 47.3% 6.5% 1.0% 0.3% 1.8% 0.0% 4.35 4.21 4.39
Economic 400 24.0% 55.5% 12.0% 2.0% 0.5% 5.3% 0.8% 4.07 4.32 4.36
Development & Local
Employment
Development of 400 25.3% 53.3% 13.3% 6.3% 1.3% 0.5% 0.3% 3.96 3.92 4.01
Tourism
Financial 400 53.0% 37.0% 4.0% 0.5% 0.3% 5.3% 0.0% 4.50 4.48 4.56
Management
Revenue-raising 400 32.5% 52.0% 6.5% 1.0% 1.0% 7.0% 0.0% 4.23 4.23 4.13
Staff Management 400 19.3% 53.8% 8.3% 1.0% 0.5% 17.3% 0.0% 4.09 3.96 4.14
Disaster Management 400 45.8% 45.8% 3.8% 0.5% 0.0% 4.3% 0.0% 4.43 n/a 4.45
AVERAGE FOR THEME AS A 4.24 4.20 4.30
WHOLE
The average level of Importance for the responsibilities in this Theme is 4.24 (compared to
4.30 in 2017).
As in 2017, Financial Management (4.50) was accorded the highest priority and Disaster
Management second highest (4.43). Both Town Planning and Building Control, rated highly as
per the 2017 survey.
Development of Tourism was again rated the lowest priority (3.96).
Significant variances from the sample averages are also shown, below each graph, for each
responsibility area.
Noosa Customer Satisfaction Survey 2019
MARKET FACTS (QLD) PTY LTD 42
Document Set ID: 20874398
Version: 1, Version Date: 31/05/2019
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.