Original source · versioned page text
2019-06-11 S&O Committee Agenda - Item 19 - Attachment 1 - Community Satisfaction Survey Noosa Shire Council 2019
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Theme 5: Quality of Council IMPORTANCE
TOTAL Crucial Import. Nice Not Quite Don't Not Noosa LGAQ Noosa
to very Un- Know App. Mean Mean Mean
have Import. Import 2019 2017 2017
Quality of Elected 400 47.0% 45.8% 4.8% 1.5% 0.5% 0.0% 0.5% 4.38 4.50 4.60
Council
Quality of 400 35.3% 39.5% 4.5% 1.3% 0.3% 3.3% 16.0% 4.34 4.38 4.41
Councillor(s) Dealt
with
Managerial & 400 24.5% 54.0% 10.0% 0.3% 0.3% 10.0% 1.0% 4.15 4.16 4.42
Supervisory Officers
Quality/Performance 400 25.8% 66.3% 5.5% 0.8% 0.5% 1.0% 0.3% 4.17 4.17 4.32
of Outdoor Workers
Quality/Performance 400 23.0% 67.5% 7.0% 0.5% 1.3% 0.5% 0.3% 4.11 4.14 4.32
of Indoor Staff
AVERAGE FOR THEME AS A WHOLE 4.23 4.27 4.42
The average level of Importance for the responsibilities in this Theme is 4.23 (compared to 4.42
in 2017).
As in 2017, Quality of Elected Council (4.38) was accorded the highest priority, followed closely
by Quality of Councillor(s) Dealt With (4.34)
The Quality and Performance of Indoor Staff (4.11) and Quality and Performance of Outdoor
Staff (4.17) was again given lowest priority. However, all responsibility areas rated between
important and crucial for this theme.
Significant variances from the sample averages are also shown, below each graph, for each
responsibility area.
Noosa Customer Satisfaction Survey 2019
MARKET FACTS (QLD) PTY LTD 51
Document Set ID: 20874398
Version: 1, Version Date: 31/05/2019
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.