Original source · versioned page text
2019-06-11 S&O Committee Agenda - Item 19 - Attachment 1 - Community Satisfaction Survey Noosa Shire Council 2019
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Theme 3: Managing the Shire PERFORMANCE
TOTAL Very Good Fair Poor Very Don't Not Noosa LGAQ Noosa
Good Only Poor Know App. Mean Mean Mean
2019 2017 2017
Town Planning 400 10.8% 49.3% 22.8% 6.8% 2.8% 7.8% 0.0% 3.63 3.40 3.62
Building Control 400 9.0% 46.5% 27.0% 6.5% 3.0% 7.8% 0.3% 3.57 3.45 3.68
Economic 400 5.5% 28.0% 30.5% 7.8% 3.3% 24.0% 1.0% 3.33 3.01 3.20
Development &
Local Employment
Development of 400 23.5% 50.8% 15.5% 3.8% 1.0% 5.0% 0.5% 3.97 3.39 3.83
Tourism
Financial 400 13.8% 37.3% 19.0% 4.5% 1.0% 24.5% 0.0% 3.77 3.25 3.74
Management
Revenue-raising 400 9.3% 32.5% 21.0% 3.0% 1.5% 32.8% 0.0% 3.67 3.14 3.65
Staff Management 400 5.8% 31.8% 15.0% 2.3% 1.0% 44.3% 0.0% 3.70 3.39 3.60
Disaster 400 15.8% 48.3% 11.0% 2.5% 0.8% 21.5% 0.3% 3.97 n/a 3.91
Management
AVERAGE FOR THEME AS A 3.70 3.29 3.65
WHOLE
The average performance rating for this Theme is 3.70 (compared to 3.65 in 2017).
Similar to the 2017 result, the top performers were:
Disaster Management (3.97)
Financial Management (3.77)
The poorest performing areas were Economic Development & Local Employment (3.33).
All areas rating fair to good for this Theme.
Significant variances from the sample averages are also shown, below each graph, for each
responsibility area.
Noosa Customer Satisfaction Survey 2019
MARKET FACTS (QLD) PTY LTD 68
Document Set ID: 20874398
Version: 1, Version Date: 31/05/2019
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.