Original source · versioned page text
2019-06-11 S&O Committee Agenda - Item 19 - Attachment 1 - Community Satisfaction Survey Noosa Shire Council 2019
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Theme 5: Quality of Council PERFORMANCE
TOTAL Very Good Fair Poor Very Don't Not Noosa LGAQ Noosa
Good Only Poor Know App. Mean Mean Mean
2019 2017 2017
Quality and Performance 400 10.5% 54.3% 20.5% 6.0% 1.3% 7.3% 0.3% 3.72 3.39 3.75
of Staff
Quality of Councillor(s) 400 10.0% 30.0% 14.3% 5.8% 1.3% 21.3% 17.5% 3.68 3.34 3.80
Dealt with
Managerial & Supervisory 400 7.3% 32.5% 14.8% 2.3% 1.8% 40.8% 0.8% 3.71 3.36 3.62
Officers
Quality/Performance of 400 16.8% 58.0% 14.5% 3.8% 0.8% 6.0% 0.3% 3.92 3.68 3.93
Outdoor Workers
Quality/Performance of 400 11.0% 56.0% 13.5% 1.8% 0.3% 17.5% 0.0% 3.92 3.59 3.92
Indoor Staff
AVERAGE FOR THEME AS A WHOLE 3.79 3.47 3.80
The average performance rating for this Theme is 3.79 (compared to 3.80 in 2017).
The equal top performers were Quality/Performance of Outdoor Staff and Indoor Staff with
which rated 3.92 and is almost the same as the result for 2017.
The poorest performing area again for this theme was the Quality of Councillor(s) Dealt With
(3.68). This was a change from 2017 survey, where Managerial & Supervisory Officer were rated
as the lowest performers.
All areas for this theme rated between fair and good.
Significant variances from the sample averages are also shown, below each graph, for each
responsibility area.
Noosa Customer Satisfaction Survey 2019
MARKET FACTS (QLD) PTY LTD 77
Document Set ID: 20874398
Version: 1, Version Date: 31/05/2019
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.