08/0056 - Operational Works - Landscaping (Road Reserve) [As Published] · 142008.56

INTEGRATED PLANNING ACT 1997 IDAS Assessment Checklist, Version 21.0, 3 September 2007

 

ASSOCIATED WITH RECONFIGURING A LOT; RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IN A WILD RIVER
AREA

4.2 | |Is any of the proposed operational work associated with reconfiguring a lot and the reconfiguration is also assessable?
No Yes

 

If yes, is any part of the premises in a wild river area declared under the Wild Rivers Act 2005?
oO No - (Complete Form 1, Part E) The aperational work associated with reconfiguring is assessed by the local government.

O Yes

If yes, is the proposed operational work for residential, commercial or industrial purposes outside a designated urban area,
as defined by the Wild Rivers Act 2005?
0 No - (Complete Form 1, Part E) The operational work associated with reconfiguring is assessed by the focal government.

oO Yes (Complete Form 1, Part E) The operational work associated with reconfiguring is assessed by the local government, and subject tothe
declaration for the relevant wild river area, assessment by the local government is required for the purposes of the Wild Rivers Act 2005.

IPA. schedule 8 part J, table 4. tom 2 IP Reguistion schedule |. part 2. table 5 tem I(c) Wild Revers code (Note: the code does not currently contain appkcable provisions for residential,
industrial of commercial development ips:da a designated urban area)

VEGETATION CLEARING; KOALA CONSERVATION; WILD RIVER AREA
4.3 |\s any of the proposed operational work for the clearing of native vegetation to which the Vegetation Management Act 1999 applies?

 

 

K{No 0 Yes
tf yes, is the proposed clearing assessable (i.e, not an exception) under schedule 8, part 1, table 4 of the IPA?
CI No (Yes

if yes, is the proposed vegetation clearing a relevant purpose under the Vegetation Management Act 1999, section 22A

for one or more of the following?

(a) A project declared to bea significant project under the State Development and Public Works ~[_] No Yes
Organisation Act 1971, section 26

(b) Necessary to control non-native ptants or declared pest Ono ClYes
(c) To ensure public safety Ono (Yes
(d) For establishing a necessary fence, firebreak, road or vehicle track, or for constructing No OYes

necessary built infrastructure, if there is no suitable alternative site for the fence, firebreak,
road, track or infrastructure
(e) A natural and ordinary consequence of other assessable development for which a CINo LYes
development approvat as defined under the Planning Act was given, or a development
application as defined under the Planning Act was made, before 16 May 2003

(f} For fodder harvesting CNno (Yes

(g) For thinning (No £1 Yes

(h) For clearing of encroachment OONo (Yes

(i) For an extractive industry CONe (Yes

() For clearing regrowth on leases issued under the Land Act 1994 for agriculture or grazing (]No {1 Yes
purposes

(k) For clearing regrowth on freehold land, or indigenous land, in a wild river high preservation [No ClYes
area.

If no to all~ The clearing is not a relevant purpose and the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive the application,

If yes to any one, is the proposed clearing associated with a material change of use or reconfiguring a lot for which

referratis required in relation to.clearing vegetation (ie. did you answer ‘yes’ to all questions in either Q2.1.4 or Q 3.3)?

OO yYes

CJ No - Answer (a}(b) and (c) befows Uniess the advice provided below (in relation to afl elements of the proposed clearing) is *The clearing is not a
relevant purpose and the Assessment Manager must refuse to receive the application” - Complete Form 1, Part J. This application requires

assessment by the Department of Natural Resources and Water (NRW). If NRW is not the Assessment Manager. the agency has jurisdiction
as Concurrence Agency.

 

 

 

 

Page 23