Council archive · source document
2017-05-04_Request for Extension to Relevant Period_REV A · 152006.1999
Attached to the e-mail Request for Extension to Relevant Period 152006.1999.01.
Specific Outcomes Probable Solutions Comments
dedication will also be protected
through the implementation of
vegetation covenants. It is noted
that stormwater management will
require to be implemented to
ensure appropriate water quality
measures are implemented.
Open space network
O98 Land within the Rural Zone forms No solution provided O98 - Complies. The open space
part of an open space network between network within the locality will be
Lake Weyba and the Tewantin State further enhanced through significant
Forest and sub-coastal escarpment. dedication of 52.757 hectares of
parkland.
The community’s current awareness of the development approval (s388 (b) SPA)
Response
There is reasonable level of community awareness that the site will be developed for rural residential land
use purposes. Despite this development proposal originally being a code assessable application, it is
considered that the community would be reasonably aware of the proposed development, with respect
to:-
The development approval (Planning and Environment Court Judgement 344 of 2009 dated 5th
July, 2013) is publicly available on Council’s PD Online system;
The land adjoins similar land use and is the next in sequence to adjacent and surrounding urban
and rural residential development;
Out of the 17 direct adjoining landowners, 13 owners have retained ownership for the entire
period since the original development application was lodged;
The remaining 4 purchasers which acquired adjoining premises after the development was
approved, could have easily obtain information from Council regarding possible developments
and approvals on neighbouring properties as part of their due diligence.
whether, if the request were refused—
(i) further rights to make a submission may be available for a further development
application; and
(ii) the likely extent to which those rights may be exercised (s385 (c) SPA)
Response
The application if it were remade would be subject to a higher level of assessment requiring impact
assessment as the site is now zoned as Rural under the current Noosa Plan 2006. Therefore, if this request
was refused, further rights to make a submission would be available if a fresh development application
was lodged. However, this does not preclude an extension being granted.
JFP Ref: M1775 REV. A Page 17
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
2017-05-04_Request for Extension to Relevant Period_REV A.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
2017-05-04_Request for Extension to Relevant Period_REV A.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.4 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.