Original source · versioned page text
NPM Submission - S Yuille - LATE - Proforma - MCU21/0110
Objec&on to the Proposed Hotel at Noosa Springs: MCU 21/0110 It has not gone unno3ced that this DA has been opened for comment for a short period of 3me just before Christmas when most people are otherwise occupied or away. No analysis has been provided in the Adamson Town Planning Report of the impact upon exis3ng users of Noosa Springs Resort, including members and residents. This impact is significant. The “material change of use” will adversely affect every person in Noosa Springs, The Oasis, Parkridge, Elysium and The Fairways (795 proper3es), resort staff and members. The development fails so many tests: • It isn’t “bou3que”, in fact it will have roughly the same number of rooms as the French Quarter in Has3ngs Street • At 12m high it will visually overpower exis3ng buildings • Two thirds of the development is to be built on land zoned “recrea3onal and open space” • It breaches height and setback restric3ons • Zoning maps indicate it is a “Core Koala Habitat”, “a Koala Priority Habitat” and this will be lost together with other fauna and flora • There is only a single, narrow access road already shared by exis3ng and significant residen3al developments. This proposed development, with poten3ally 224 occupants, plus children and addi3onal staff, the already exis3ng fire evacua3on risk will be significantly increased with poten3ally disastrous ramifica3ons. Numerous discussions with Council in the past has done lible to alleviate this very serious issue e.g. The Oasis Body Corporate Review of Emergency Evacua3on Provisions • The DA suggests that the guests and staff will be arriving and leaving on 2 wheels or public transport. This is just not realis3c • An already busy carpark will be inadequate for guests, staff, golfers and those who use the spa, gym, medical facili3es, restaurant etc. It is already over capacity at peak 3mes and the Parking Studies lack meaningful analysis • There will be increased noise and ac3vity in an area where many elderly people reside and will affect the quiet enjoyment and wellbeing of residents and poten3ally their security and safety • The club house, golf course, gym, restaurant, spa and pool will not be as available to residents and members with Tee Times likely to be at a premium as hotel guests will likely be given priority • The developers are poten3ally “double-dipping” as the land originally earmarked for a hotel was used to build Parkridge. Many of the above serve to undermine the integrity of the Noosa Plan 2020. I object to the Applica3on for the proposed hotel on the above grounds. Signatures:………………………………………………………………………………………………………….Date: 27th December 2021 Villa 128, Noosa Springs, 61 Noosa Springs Drive, Noosa Heads, Qld 4567 Name and Address:………………………………………………………………………………………….. Document Set ID: 21745477 Version: 1, Version Date: 04/01/2022 [OCR of page images] Objection to the Proposed Hotel at Noosa Springs: Mcu 21/0110 It has not gone unnoticed that this DA has been opened for comment for a short period of time just before Christmas when most people are otherwise occupied or away. No analysis has been provided in the Adamson Town Planning Report of the impact upon existing users of Noosa Springs Resort, including members and residents. This impact is significant. The “material change of use” will adversely affect every person in Noosa Springs, The Oasis, Parkridge, Elysium and The Fairways (795 properties), resort staff and members. The development fails so many tests: * It isn’t “boutique”, in fact it will have roughly the same number of rooms as the French Quarter in Hastings Street ¢ At 12m high it will visually overpower existing buildings * Two thirds of the development is to be built on land zoned “recreational and open space” ° It breaches height and setback restrictions * Zoning maps indicate it is a “Core Koala Habitat”, “a Koala Priority Habitat” and this will be lost together with other fauna and flora ¢ There is only a single, narrow access road already shared by existing and significant residential developments. This proposed development, with potentially 224 occupants, plus children and additional staff, the already existing fire evacuation risk will be significantly increased with potentially disastrous ramifications. Numerous discussions with Council in the past has done little to alleviate this very serious issue e.g. The Oasis Body Corporate Review of Emergency Evacuation Provisions °* The DA suggests that the guests and staff will be arriving and leaving on 2 wheels or public transport. This is just not realistic ¢ An already busy carpark will be inadequate for guests, staff, golfers and those who use the spa, gym, medical facilities, restaurant etc. It is already over capacity at peak times and the Parking Studies lack meaningful analysis ¢ There will be increased noise and activity in an area where many elderly people reside and will affect the quiet enjoyment and wellbeing of residents and potentially their security and safety ¢ The club house, golf course, gym, restaurant, spa and pool will not be as available to residents and members with Tee Times likely to be at a premium as hotel guests will likely be given priority °* The developers are potentially “double-dipping” as the land originally earmarked for a hotel was used to build Parkridge. Many of the above serve to undermine the integrity of the Noosa Plan 2020. | object to the Application for the proposed hotel on the above grounds. SigMatUrestnninrnnfndE Name and Address: Document Set ID: 21745477 Version: 1, Version Date: 04/01/2022
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (NPM Submission - S Yuille - LATE - Proforma - MCU21_0110.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.