Skip to the record
For the highest quality transcripts.

Original source · versioned page text

LATE RFI Attachment 5 - Advice from Traffic and Transport Plus

of 27

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Very large file: it may take a few minutes

The original of this document is very large (11.8 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Original PDF page 7, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.

27.   I note that at night time vehicles entering Opal Street from Elm Street would have their headlights lit and would
      be more visible to vehicles reversing from the western space — were these vehicles to not have their headlights
      lit at night I would consider a significant fault to be with the driver of the car with unlit headlights rather than it
      being a characteristic of traffic operation.
28.   Vehicles larger than those I have utilised in my demonstrations would be more visible and unlikely to be
      obscured by the obstructions identified in the RFI.
29.   To ensure that vehicles entering Opal Street from its western end utilise the part of the carriageway closer to
      the centreline (and therefore be further from a vehicle reversing from the western space), I recommend that a
      road line be painted on the northern side of Opal Street, extending from that from kerb of the north east corner
      eastwards towards the proposed access (similar to what is shown Figure 5). Such a painted line will encourage
      eastbound vehicles on Opal Street to remain close the centreline and ensure vehicles reversing from the
      proposed on-street parking spaces adjacent to the subject site are able to view vehicles on Opal Street and
      stop appropriately to give way.
                  Figure 5 — Proposed painted line to delineate main carriageway from shoulder area




      20230606_TTPlus_TrafficResponseToRFI.docx                                                                      7



                                                                                                                  007
Log in to download the original file

LATE RFI Attachment 5 - Advice from Traffic and Transport Plus.pdf · 11.8 MB (very large file)

Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.