Council archive · source document
Information Request Response Lot 22 · MCU22/0038
ii. “Additionally, the location of the subject site within the broader Noosa Business Centre means
that a significant portion of development-generated trips are likely to be linked with other uses,
therefore reducing parking demand and spreading it across the existing parking areas proximate
to the subject site.”
In relation to the two grounds identified in the SLR memo:
i. It is understood that the proponent is not proposing to deliver the multi-modal transport hub.
ii. While it is agreed that there will be linked trips with other uses at the Noosa Business Centre, all
that means is that the overall traffic generation rate of the centre on a GFA basis reduces as the
size of the centre increases, it does not mean that parking demands associated with the proposal
will reduce. It simply means that some customers will park for longer in the same parking space
while they undertake other activities at the Centre. The customers and staff of the proposed
development will still generate the same parking demands.
INFORMATION REQUIRED
Provide parking provisions consistent with planning scheme requirements.
Our Response
SLR have prepared an attached letter responding to this specific RFI item, refer Appendix C, with the
relevant commentary extracted below.
To inform NSC’s assessment of the application, the following clarifications are provided:
· Further correspondence with Council’s strategic planning team has confirmed (since the
drafting of this IR) that the new parking rates, as assessed within the SLR Traffic Impact
Statement under ‘Amended Structure Plan Rates’, are proposed to be adopted by Council
in the Planning Scheme amendment.
· The provision of 99 parking spaces as per the proposed development plan will be sufficient
to accommodate peak parking demands in the context of future planning.
In addition to the proposed parking rates being supported by Council’s own forward planning, SLR have
also provided a first principles assessment and justification for the parking to be provided in the
proposed medical development. In SLR’s opinion;
|5
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Information Request Response Lot 22.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 127 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.