Original source · versioned page text
2022-07-12 Planning & Environment Meeting Agenda
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (26.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JULY 2022 2 MCU21/0228 & OPW21/0364 – CHANGE REPRESENTATIONS TO A DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR MULTIPLE DWELLING AND OFFICE, AND ROADWORK, DRAINAGE WORK, LANDSCAPING, STORMWATER, EARTHWORKS - 245 DAVID LOW WAY PEREGIAN BEACH QLD 4573 Author Development Planner, Georgina Schramm Environment and Sustainable Development Department Index ECM/ Applications / MCU21/0228 & OPW21/0364 Attachments 1. Development Plans APPLICATION DETAILS Applicant Altum Property Group C/- JFP Urban Consultants Pty Ltd Development Approval Material Change of Use - Multiple dwelling, Office Operational Works – Roadwork, Drainage Work, Landscaping, Stormwater, Earthworks Representations Received on 20 May 2022 Number of Submissions for Not applicable Original Application PROPERTY DETAILS Property Address 245 David Low Way Peregian Beach Qld 4573 RP Description Lot 22 P 9315 Land Area 582m² Existing Use of Land Residential STATUTORY DETAILS SEQRP Designation Urban Footprint Locality Peregian Beach Zone Medium Density Residential Overlays Acid Sulfate Soils Overlay (5 metres AHD or Below (Area 1)) Assessment Type Representations made to original approval EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Preliminary Approval was issued on 4 April 2022 for Multiple Dwelling (3 units) and Office, and Operational Works (Roadwork, Drainage Work, Landscaping, Stormwater, Earthworks. A Preliminary Approval was issued as the proposed development due to: • non-compliance with the Dual Occupancy and Multiple Dwelling Use Code regarding accessibility requirements; • the proposed reduced front boundary setback and presentation of the building was considered to dominant the roadside due to the scale of the upper-level vertical screen; and • unresolved landscaping matters relating to the existing well-established vegetation in the road reserve. Page 14 of 150
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.