Original source · versioned page text
2022-07-12 Planning & Environment Meeting Agenda
The original of this document is very large (26.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JULY 2022
current floor plan of the development. The purpose of the outcome is to ensure that a wide section
of the community including people with limited mobility can access at least one of the three units.
The provisions ensure there is access for persons who are not capable of accessing a unit via a
staircase. Should the development not require safe, continuous, and step-free path of travel from
the car park, with a step free entrance door and including a bathroom on the entry level this unfairly
excludes a demographic of the community.
The applicant has raised that the provision in the scheme is invalid and conflicts with the National
Construction Code (NCC). The provision of the Noosa Plan 2020 is not in conflict with the NCC.
The planning scheme requires a higher standard of development than the NCC, which is similar in
nature to the scheme’s alternative provisions to the Queensland Development Code, i.e. building
setbacks, built form or the alike.
The applicant has provided detail relating to affordability, construction, and maintenance costs of
providing a lift to allow for an insight of financial cost of a lift to service the development. Financial
implications or circumstances of a person/s cannot be taken into consideration when undertaking
assessment of an application as per section 43 (2) of the Planning Act 2016. Further to this, it is to
be noted that the applicant’s representations refers to all three units being serviced by a lift,
whereas the condition imposed is reflective of the Acceptable outcome which outlines only one of
the three units.
There is a clear nexus between the imposition of the condition and the proposed development, and
the condition is considered reasonable and relevant. Therefore the removal of the condition is not
supported. The further information provided by the applicant does not address condition 2.1 of the
Preliminary Approval and therefore it is recommended that the condition be maintained and the
approval remain as a Preliminary Approval.
It is acknowledged by Council Officer’s that the non-compliance with the requirement was not
identified until late into the assessment of the application, however, this does not warrant the
requirement of the Noosa Plan 2020 to be overridden or relaxed.
Figure 4 – Floor Plans
Page 21 of 150
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.