Original source · versioned page text
7. Appendix D - SPP SDAP Checklists and Assessment Benchmarks
APPENDIX D – SPP AND SDAP CHECKLIST AND
ASSESSMENT BENCHMARKS
1
[OCR of page images]
—
URBIS
De
APPENDIX D - SPP AND SDAP CHECKLIST AND
ASSESSMENT BENCHMARKS
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 26 pages
Page 2
SPP CHECKLIST
Matters of State Planning Type Relevant to Development / Assessment
Interest Scheme Trigger Required
Reflects State
Interest*
Housing Supply No No Assessment Benchmarks
and Diversity
Liveable No MCU A development application in an No
Communities urban area involving premises that
ROL is, or will be, accessed by common N/A
private title, for:
Application involving buildings –
either attached or detached – that
are not covered by other legislation
or planning provisions mandating
fire hydrants.
Agriculture No No Assessment Benchmarks
Development and No No Assessment Benchmarks
Construction
Mining and No ROL Within a Key Resource Area (KRA) N/A
Extractive
Resources MCU Within the resource/ processing No
area of a KRA or the separation
area for the resource/processing
area of a KRA, unless for:
(a) dwelling house on an existing
lot, or
(b) home-based business (where
not employing more than two non-
resident people on a full-time
equivalent basis), or
(c) caretaker’s accommodation
(associated with an extractive
industry), or
(d) animal husbandry, or
(e) cropping.
MCU Within the transport routes No
separation area of a KRA that will
result in an increase in the number
of people working or residing in the
2
Page 3
Matters of State Planning Type Relevant to Development / Assessment
Interest Scheme Trigger Required
Reflects State
Interest*
transport route separation area,
unless for:
(a) dwelling house on an existing
lot, or
(b) home-based business (where
not employing more than two non-
resident people on a full-time
equivalent basis), or
(c) caretaker’s accommodation
(associated with an extractive
industry), or
(d) animal husbandry, or
(e) cropping.
Tourism No No Assessment Benchmarks
Biodiversity No No Assessment Benchmarks
Coastal No No Assessment Benchmarks
Environment
Cultural Heritage No No Assessment Benchmarks
Water Quality No MCU for an urban purpose that involves No
premises 2,500m² or greater and;
(a) will result in 6 or more
dwellings; or
(b) will result in an impervious
area greater than 25%
of the net developable area
No MCU Where located wholly outside an No
urban area and relating to
premises that is within, or partly
within, a water supply buffer area,
that involves:
a) intensive animal industry,
b) medium and high-impact
industry,
3
Page 4
Matters of State Planning Type Relevant to Development / Assessment
Interest Scheme Trigger Required
Reflects State
Interest*
c) noxious and hazardous industry,
d) extractive industry,
e) utility installation that involves
sewerage services, drainage or
stormwater services,
f) waste management facilities, or
g) motor sport facility
No ROL For an urban purpose that involves N/A
premises 2,500m² or and will result
in 6 or more lots.
No ROL Where located wholly outside an N/A
urban area and relating to
premises that is within, or partly
within, a water supply buffer area,
that involves:
Creating 5 or more additional lots if
any resultant lot is less than 16Ha,
and any of the lots created will rely
on on-site wastewater treatment.
No OPW for an urban purpose that involves N/A
disturbing a land area 2,500m² or
greater.
Emissions and No No Assessment Benchmarks
Hazardous
Activities
Natural Hazards, No MCU Where in any of the following: No
Risk and No ROL (1) bushfire prone areas N/A
Resilience
(2) flood hazard areas
No OPW N/A
(3) landslide hazard areas
(4) storm tide inundation areas
(5) erosion prone area
Note: There are specific assessment
benchmarks which apply for erosion prone
areas in the coastal management district,
separate to other natural hazards.
4
Page 5
Matters of State Planning Type Relevant to Development / Assessment
Interest Scheme Trigger Required
Reflects State
Interest*
Energy and No No Assessment Benchmarks
Water Supply
Infrastructure No No Assessment Benchmarks
Integration
Transport No No Assessment Benchmarks
Infrastructure
Strategic Airports No MCU Where: No
and Aviation
a) A premises that will result in a
Facilities
building, structure or associated
activity intruding into the
operational airspace of a
strategic airport; or
b) any part of the premises is
within the light restriction zone
or lighting area buffer of a
strategic airport; or
c) any part of the premises is
within a wildlife hazard buffer
zone of a strategic airport; or
d) any part of the premises is
within a public safety area of a
strategic airport; or
e) any part of the premises is
within the 20 ANEF contour or
greater for a strategic airport; or
f) A premises that will result in a
building, structure or associated
activity intruding into the building
restricted area of an aviation
facility.
No ROL Where: N/A
a) any part of the premises is
within a public safety area of a
strategic airport; or
5
Page 6
Matters of State Planning Type Relevant to Development / Assessment
Interest Scheme Trigger Required
Reflects State
Interest*
b) any part of the premises is
within the 20 ANEF contour or
greater for a strategic airport
No BW Where not associated with an N/A
MCU and:
a) will result in a building,
structure or associated activity
intruding into the building
restricted area of an aviation
facility.
b) any part of the premises is
within the light restriction zone
or lighting area buffer of a
strategic airport; or
c) A premises that will result in a
building, structure or
associated activity intruding
into the building restricted area
of an aviation facility.
No OPW Where not associated with an N/A
MCU and:
a) the work or associated activity
will intrude into the operational
airspace of a strategic airport;
or
b) any part of the premises is
within the light restriction zone
or lighting area buffer of a
strategic airport; or
c) the work or associated activity
will intrude into the building
restricted area of an aviation
facility.
Strategic Ports No No Assessment Benchmarks
6
Page 7
SDAP CHECKLIST
Matters of Type Referral Relevant Relevant State Codes
State Interest Required Provisions of the
Regulation
Aquaculture MCU No Schedule 10, State code 17: Aquaculture
Part 6, Division 1,
Subdivision 3,
Table 1
Environmentally MCU No Schedule 10, State code 22: Environmentally
relevant Part 5, Division 4, relevant activities
activities Table 1
Fish habitat Build. Works N/A Schedule 9, Part State code 12: Development in
area – works or 3, Table 2 a declared fish habitat area
other
Op. Works N/A Schedule 10,
development
Part 6, Division 2,
Subdivision 3,
Table 1
Marine Plants – Op. Works N/A Schedule 10, State code 11: Removal,
removal, Part 6, Division 3, destruction or damage of
destruction or Subdivision 3, marine plants
damage Table 1
RoL where N/A Schedule 10,
involving Op. Part 6, Division 3,
Works for the Subdivision 3,
removal, Table 2
destruction or
damage to
marine plants
MCU where N/A Schedule 10,
involving Op. Part 6, Division 3,
Works for the Subdivision 3,
removal, Table 2
destruction or
damage to
marine plants
Native RoL N/A Schedule 10, State code 16: Native
vegetation Part 3, Division 4, vegetation clearing
clearing Table 2
Op. Works N/A Schedule 10,
Part 3, Division 4,
Table 1
7
Page 8
Matters of Type Referral Relevant Relevant State Codes
State Interest Required Provisions of the
Regulation
MCU No Schedule 10,
Part 3, Division 4,
Table 3
Queensland Build. Works No Part 8, Division 1, State code 14: Queensland
heritage Subdivision 1 heritage
Various aspects No Schedule 10,
of Dev. Part 8, Division 2,
Subdivision 3
Tidal works or MCU No Schedule 10, State code 8: Coastal
development in Part 17, Division development and tidal works
a coastal 3, Table 6
management
district
RoL N/A Schedule 10,
Part 17, Division
3, Table 5
Op. Works N/A Schedule 10,
Part 17, Division
3, Table 1
Schedule 10,
Part 17, Division
3, Table 2
Schedule 10,
Part 17, Division
3, Table 3
Schedule 10,
Part 17, Division
3, Table 4
Build. Works N/A Schedule 9, Part
3, Division 1,
Table 1
Water – taking Op. Works N/A Schedule 10, State code 10: Taking or
or interfering Part 19, Division interfering with water
with 1, Subdivision 3,
Table 1
Watercourse or All aspects of No Schedule 10, State code 15: Removal of
lake – removal Dev. Part 19, Division quarry material from a
of quarry 2, Subdivision 3, watercourse, lake or estuary
material Table 1
8
Page 9
Matters of Type Referral Relevant Relevant State Codes
State Interest Required Provisions of the
Regulation
Category 3 Op. Works N/A Schedule 10, State code 19: Category 3
levees Part 19, Division levees
4, Subdivision 3,
Table 1
Waterway Op. Works N/A Schedule 10, State code 18: Construction or
barrier works – Part 6, Division 4, raising waterway barrier works
constructing or Subdivision 3, in fish habitats
raising Table 1
Wetland – land RoL N/A Schedule 10, State code 9: Great Barrier
in or near Part 20, Division Reef wetland protection areas
4, Table 2
MCU No Schedule 10,
Part 20, Division
4, Table 3
Op. Works N/A Schedule 10,
Part 20, Division
4, Table 1
Unexploded RoL N/A Schedule 10, State code 13: Unexploded
ordnance Part 4, Division 2, ordnance
(UXO) Table 1
MCU Schedule 10,
Part 4, Division 2,
Table 1
Referable dams Op. Works N/A Schedule 10, State code 20: Referable dams
Part 19, Division
3, Subdivision 3,
Table 1
Maritime safety Op. Works N/A Schedule 10, State code 7: Maritime safety
Part 17, Division
3, Table 2
9
Page 10
Matters of Type Referral Relevant Relevant State Codes
State Interest Required Provisions of the
Regulation
State transport Build. Works N/A Schedule 9, Part If near a state controlled road
corridors 3, Division 1, or future state controlled
Table 3 – State road:
transport corridor
State code 1: Development in a
state-controlled road
environment
In near a railway corridor or
future railway corridor:
State code 2: Development in a
railway environment
Schedule 9, Part If near a busway corridor or
3, Division 1, future busway corridor:
Table 4 – Future State code 3: Development in a
state transport busway environment
corridor
If near a light rail corridor or
future light rail corridor:
State code 4: Development in a
light rail environment
RoL N/A Schedule 10, If near a state controlled road
Part 9, Division 4, or future state controlled
Subdivision 2, road:
Table 1 (STC)
State code 1: Development in a
Schedule 10, state-controlled road
Part 9, Division 4, environment
Subdivision 2,
In near a railway corridor or
Table 2 (future
future railway corridor:
STC)
State code 2: Development in a
Schedule 10,
railway environment
Part 9, Division 4,
Subdivision 2, If near a busway corridor or
Table 3 (SCR future busway corridor:
Intersection) State code 3: Development in a
busway environment
If near a light rail corridor or
future light rail corridor:
State code 4: Development in a
light rail environment
10
Page 11
Matters of Type Referral Relevant Relevant State Codes
State Interest Required Provisions of the
Regulation
MCU or Op. No Schedule 10, If near a state controlled road
Works Part 9, Division 4, or future state controlled
Subdivision 2, road:
Table 4 (STC and
State code 1: Development in a
future STC)
state-controlled road
environment
In near a railway corridor or
future railway corridor:
State code 2: Development in a
railway environment
If near a busway corridor or
future busway corridor:
State code 3: Development in a
busway environment
If near a light rail corridor or
future light rail corridor:
State code 4: Development in a
light rail environment
Op. Works No Schedule 10, If near a state controlled road
Part 9, Division 4, or future state controlled
Subdivision 2, road:
Table 5 (STC)
State code 1: Development in a
Schedule 10, state-controlled road
Part 9, Division 4, environment
Subdivision 2,
In near a railway corridor or
Table 6 (Future
future railway corridor:
STC)
State code 2: Development in a
railway environment
If near a busway corridor or
future busway corridor:
State code 3: Development in a
busway environment
If near a light rail corridor or
future light rail corridor:
State code 4: Development in a
light rail environment
11
Page 12
Matters of Type Referral Relevant Relevant State Codes
State Interest Required Provisions of the
Regulation
State transport Various Yes Schedule 10, State code 6: Protection of
infrastructure aspects of Part 9, Division state transport networks
(thresholds) Dev. 4, Subdivision 1,
Table 1
State-controlled RoL N/A Schedule 10, State code 5: Development in a
transport Part 9, Division 4, state-controlled transport tunnel
tunnels Subdivision 3, environment
Table 1 (STT and
future STT)
MCU No Schedule 10,
Part 9, Division 4,
Subdivision 3,
Table 2 (STT and
future STT)
Op. Works N/A Schedule 10,
Part 9, Division 4,
Subdivision 3,
Table 3 (STT and
future STT)
Brisbane core Op. Works – N/A Schedule 10, If near a state controlled road
port land near a state Part 13, Division or future state controlled
transport 1, Subdivision 2, road:
corridor Table 2
State code 1: Development in a
state-controlled road
environment
In near a railway corridor or
future railway corridor:
State code 2: Development in a
railway environment
If near a busway corridor or
future busway corridor:
State code 3: Development in a
busway environment
If near a light rail corridor or
future light rail corridor:
State code 4: Development in a
light rail environment
12
Page 13
Matters of Type Referral Relevant Relevant State Codes
State Interest Required Provisions of the
Regulation
Op. Works – N/A Schedule 10, If near a state controlled road
near a future Part 13, Division or future state controlled
state transport 1, Subdivision 2, road:
corridor Table 3
State code 1: Development in a
state-controlled road
environment
In near a railway corridor or
future railway corridor:
State code 2: Development in a
railway environment
If near a busway corridor or
future busway corridor:
State code 3: Development in a
busway environment
If near a light rail corridor or
future light rail corridor:
State code 4: Development in a
light rail environment
MCU – near a No Schedule 10, If near a state controlled road
state transport Part 13, Division or future state controlled
corridor or that 1, Subdivision 2, road:
is a future state Table 4
State code 1: Development in a
transport
state-controlled road
corridor
environment
In near a railway corridor or
future railway corridor:
State code 2: Development in a
railway environment
If near a busway corridor or
future busway corridor:
State code 3: Development in a
busway environment
If near a light rail corridor or
future light rail corridor:
State code 4: Development in a
light rail environment
MCU of No Schedule 10, State code 22: Environmentally
premises for an Part 13, Division relevant activities
13
Page 14
Matters of Type Referral Relevant Relevant State Codes
State Interest Required Provisions of the
Regulation
environmentally 1, Subdivision 2,
relevant activity Table 6
MCU or Op. No Schedule 10, State code 7: Maritime safety
Works – tidal Part 13, Division
AND
works or works 1, Subdivision 2,
in a coastal Table 7 State code 8: Coastal
management development and tidal works
district
MCU – No Schedule 10, State code 21: Hazardous
hazardous Part 13, Division chemical facilities
chemical facility 1, Subdivision 2,
Table 8
Op. Works – N/A Schedule 10, State code 10: Taking or
taking or Part 13, Division interfering with water
interfering with 1, Subdivision 2,
water Table 9
Op. Works – N/A Schedule 10, State code 20: Referable dams
particular dams Part 13, Division
1, Subdivision 2,
Table 10
MCU or Op. No Schedule 10, State code 12: Development in
Works – Part 13, Division a declared fish habitat area
relating to 1, Subdivision 2,
OR
fisheries Table 11
State code 11: Removal,
destruction or damage of
marine plants
OR
State code 17: Aquaculture
OR
State code 18: Constructing or
raising waterway barrier works
in fish habitats
Urban design MCU No Schedule 10, State code 24: Urban design
Part 18, Table 1
14
Page 15
15 [OCR of page images] uRBIS |
Page 16
STATE CODE 6: PROTECTION OF STATE TRANSPORT
NETWORKS
Table 6.2.2: All development
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Network impacts
PO1 Development does not result in No acceptable outcome is PO1 Complies
a worsening of the safety of a state- prescribed. The proposed development
controlled road. is not located in close
proximity to a state-
Note: To demonstrate compliance controlled road.
with this performance outcome, it is
recommended that a Registered
Professional Engineer of
Queensland (RPEQ) certified road
safety audit or road safety
assessment (as applicable) is
provided.
Further information on determining
whether a road safety audit or road
safety assessment is required is
provided in section 9 of the Guide to
Traffic Impact Assessment,
Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2017.
PO2 Development does not result in No acceptable outcome is PO2 Complies
a worsening of the infrastructure prescribed. The proposed development
condition of a state-controlled road is not located in close
or road transport infrastructure. proximity to a state-
controlled road.
Note: To demonstrate compliance
with this performance outcome, it is
recommended that a RPEQ certified
traffic impact assessment and
pavement impact assessment are
provided.
Further information on how to
prepare a traffic impact assessment
and pavement impact assessment is
provided in the Guide to Traffic
Impact Assessment, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
PO3 Development does not result in No acceptable outcome is PO3 Complies
a worsening of operating conditions prescribed. The proposed development
on a state-controlled road or the is not located in close
surrounding road network. proximity to a state-
controlled road.
Note: To demonstrate compliance
with this performance outcome,
16
Page 17
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
it is recommended that an RPEQ
certified traffic impact assessment is
provided.
Further information on how to
prepare a traffic impact assessment
is provided in the Guide to Traffic
Impact Assessment,
Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2017.
PO4 Development does not impose AO4.1 The layout and PO4 Complies
traffic loadings on a state-controlled design of the development The proposed development
road which could be accommodated directs traffic generated by is not located in close
on the local road network. the development to the proximity to a state-
local road network. controlled road.
PO5 Upgrade works on, or AO5.1 Upgrade works on a PO5.1 Not Applicable
associated with, a state-controlled state-controlled road are Proposed upgrade works
road are built in accordance with designed and constructed are not proposed.
relevant design standards. in accordance with the
Road Planning and Design
Manual, 2nd edition,
Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2016.
PO6 Development involving the AO6.1 Fill, extracted AO6.1 Complies
haulage of fill, extracted material or material and spoil material Any fill, extracted material
excavated spoil material exceeding is not transported to or from and spoil material will not
10,000 tonnes per year does not the development site on a be transported to or from
damage the pavement of a state- state-controlled road. the development site on a
controlled road. state-controlled road.
Note: It is recommended that a
transport infrastructure impact
assessment and pavement impact
assessment are provided.
Further information on how to
prepare a traffic impact assessment
is provided in the Guide to Traffic
Impact Assessment, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
PO7 Development does not AO7.1 Development does AO7.1 Complies
adversely impact on the safety of a not require a new railway The proposed development
railway crossing. crossing. does not require a new
railway crossing.
Note: It is recommended that a OR
traffic impact assessment be
prepared to demonstrate AO7.2 A new railway AO7.2 Not applicable
compliance with this performance crossing is grade The proposed development
outcome. An impact on a level separated. complies with AO7.1.
crossing may require an Australian
Level Crossing Assessment Model OR all of the following AO7.3 Not applicable
(ALCAM) assessment to be acceptable outcomes The proposed development
undertaken. Section 2.2 – Railway apply: complies with AO7.1.
17
Page 18
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
crossing safety of the Guide to AO7.3 Upgrades to a level
Development in a Transport crossing are designed and
Environment: Rail, Department of constructed in accordance
Transport and Main Roads, 2015, with AS1742.7 – Manual of
provides guidance on how to comply uniform traffic control
with this performance outcome. devices, Part 7: Railway
crossings and applicable
rail manager standard
drawings.
Note: It is recommended a
traffic impact assessment
be prepared to
demonstrate compliance
with this acceptable
outcome. An impact on a
level crossing may require
an Australian Level
Crossing Assessment
Model (ALCAM)
assessment to be
undertaken. Section 2.2 –
Railway crossing safety of
the Guide to Development
in a Transport
Environment: Rail,
Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2015,
provides guidance on how
to comply with this
acceptable outcome
AND
AO7.4 Access points AO7.4 Not applicable
achieve sufficient clearance The proposed development
from a level crossing in complies with AO7.1.
accordance with AS1742.7
– Manual of uniform traffic
control devices, Part 7:
Railway crossings by
providing a minimum
clearance of 5 metres from
the edge running rail (outer
rail) plus the length of the
largest vehicle anticipated
on-site.
Note: Section 2.2 of the
Guide to Development in a
Transport Environment:
Rail, Department of
Transport and Main Roads,
18
Page 19
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
2015, provides guidance on
how to comply with this
acceptable outcome.
AND
AO7.5 On-site vehicle AO7.2 Not applicable
circulation is designed to The proposed development
give priority to entering complies with AO7.1.
vehicles at all times.
PO8 Development does not result in No acceptable outcome is AO8.0 Complies
a worsening of the infrastructure prescribed. The proposed development
condition of a railway or rail will not result in a
transport infrastructure. worsening of the
infrastructure condition of a
railway or rail transport
infrastructure.
PO9 Development does not result in No acceptable outcome is
a worsening of operating conditions prescribed.
of a railway
Stormwater and drainage
PO10 Development does not result No acceptable outcome is PO10 Complies
in an actionable prescribed. An integrated water
nuisance, or worsening of, management plan has
stormwater, flooding or been prepared by Cardno.
drainage impacts in a state transport This demonstrates how
corridor. stormwater will be
managed in a way that will
avoid causing drainage
impacts or actionable
nuisance to a state
transport corridor.
PO11 Run-off from the development AO11.1 Development does AO11.1 Complies
site is not not create any new An integrated water
unlawfully discharged to a state points of discharge to a management plan has
transport corridor. state transport corridor. been prepared by Cardno.
AND There is no discharge to a
state transport corridor.
AO11.2 Stormwater run-off AO11.2 Complies
is discharged to a lawful An integrated water
point of discharge. management plan has
been prepared by Cardno
Note: Section 3.49 of the This demonstrates that the
Queensland Urban development is able to
Drainage Manual, achieve stormwater run-off
Institute of Public Works discharged to a lawful point
Engineering Australasia of discharge.
(Queensland Division)
Fourth Edition, 2016,
provides further information
on lawful points of
discharge.
19
Page 20
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AND
AO11.3 Development does AO11.3 Not Applicable
not worsen the condition No stormwater discharge is
of an existing lawful point of proposed to a state
discharge to a state transport corridor.
transport corridor.
PO12 Run-off from the development AO12.1 Run-off from the AO12.1 Complies
site does not development site is not Run-off from the
cause siltation of stormwater discharged to stormwater development will not be
infrastructure affecting a state infrastructure for a state discharged to stormwater
transport corridor. transport corridor. infrastructure for a state
transport corridor. This is
demonstrated within the
integrated water
management plan has
been prepared by Cardno
Planned upgrades
PO13 Development does not AO13.1 Development is not AO13.1 Complies
impede delivery of planned located on land SARA mapping does not
upgrades of state transport identified by the indicate any planned
infrastructure. Department of Transport upgrades to state transport
and Main infrastructure at or adjoining
Roads as land required for the site.
the planned upgrade of
state transport
infrastructure.
Note: Land required for the
planned upgrade of state
transport
infrastructure is identified in
the DA mapping system.
OR
AO13.2 Development is AO13.2 Not Applicable
sited and designed so that The proposed development
permanent buildings, complies with AO13.1.
structures, infrastructure,
services or utilities are not
located on land identified
by the Department of
Transport and Main Roads
as land required for the
planned upgrade of state
transport infrastructure.
OR all of the following AO13.3 Not Applicable
acceptable outcomes The proposed development
apply: complies with AO13.1.
AO13.3 Structures and
infrastructure located on
land identified by the
Department of Transport
20
Page 21
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
and Main Roads as land
required for the planned
upgrade of state transport
infrastructure are able
to be readily relocated or
removed without materially
affecting the viability or
functionality of the
development.
AND
AO13.4 Vehicular access AO13.4 Not Applicable
for the development is The proposed development
consistent with the function complies with AO13.1.
and design of the
planned upgrade of state
transport infrastructure.
AND
AO13.5 Development does AO13.5 Not Applicable
not involve filling and The proposed development
excavation of, or material complies with AO13.1.
changes to, land required
for a planned upgrade to a
state transport
infrastructure.
AND
AO13.6 Land is able to be AO13.6 Not Applicable
reinstated to the The proposed development
predevelopment condition complies with AO13.1.
at the completion of the
use.
Table 6.2.3: Public passenger transport infrastructure
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Public passenger transport infrastructure
PO14 Development does not damage AO14.1 Vehicular access AO14.1 Complies
or interfere and associated road No vehicular access or
with public passenger transport access works are not associated road access
infrastructure, public passenger located within 5 metres of works area proposed
services or pedestrian or cycle access public passenger transport within five meters of public
to public passenger transport infrastructure. passenger transport
infrastructure and public passenger infrastructure.
services. AND
AO14.2 Development does AO14.2 Complies
not necessitate the The proposed
relocation of existing public development does not
passenger transport necessitate the relocation
infrastructure. of existing public
passenger transport
AND infrastructure.
21
Page 22
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO14.3 Development does AO14.3 Complies
not obstruct pedestrian The proposed
or cyclist access to public development does not
passenger transport obstruct pedestrian or
infrastructure or public cyclist access to public
passenger services. passenger transport
infrastructure or public
AND passenger services.
AO14.4 The normal AO14.4 Complies
operation of public The proposed
passenger development is not located
transport infrastructure or in close proximity to public
public passenger services passenger transport
is not interrupted during infrastructure and
construction of the passenger services will not
development. be interrupted during
construction.
PO15 Upgraded or new public No acceptable outcome is PO15 Complies
passenger prescribed. The development site is
transport infrastructure is provided to located within proximity to
accommodate the demand for public the existing public
passenger transport facilities and
transport generated by the networks along Eenie
development. Creek Road.
Note: To demonstrate compliance
with this performance outcome,
it is recommended a public transport
impact assessment be
prepared in accordance with appendix
1 of the State
Development Assessment Provisions
Supporting Information –
Public Passenger Transport
Infrastructure, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2017.
New or upgraded public passenger
transport infrastructure
provided should be in accordance
with the Public Transport
Infrastructure Manual, Department of
Transport and Main Roads,
2015.
Refer to the SDAP Supporting
Information: Public passenger
transport infrastructure, Department of
Transport and Main
Roads, 2017, for further guidance on
how to comply with the
performance outcome.
PO16 Development is designed to No acceptable outcome is PO16 Not Applicable
ensure the prescribed. The proposed
22
Page 23
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
location of public passenger transport development does not
infrastructure prioritises and enables include public passenger
efficient public passenger services. transport infrastructure.
Note: Chapters 2 and 5 of the Public
Transport Infrastructure
Manual, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2015 provides
guidance on how to comply with this
performance outcome.
Refer to the SDAP Supporting
Information: Public passenger
transport infrastructure, Department of
Transport and Main
Roads, 2017, for further guidance on
how to comply with the
performance outcome.
PO17 Development enables the No acceptable outcome is PO17 Not Applicable
provision or extension of public prescribed. The proposed
passenger services to the development does not
development and avoids creating include public passenger
indirect or inefficient routes for public transport infrastructure.
passenger services.
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting
Information: Public
passenger transport infrastructure,
Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2017, for further
guidance on how to comply with the
performance outcome.
PO18 New or modified road networks AO18.1 Roads catering for AO18.1 Not Applicable
are designed buses are arterial or The proposed
to enable development to be serviced sub-arterial roads, collector development does not
by public or their equivalent. include public passenger
passenger services. transport infrastructure.
AND
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting AO18.2 Roads intended to AO18.2 Not Applicable
Information: Public accommodate buses are The development will not
passenger transport infrastructure, designed and constructed propose for public
Department of Transport and in accordance with Road passenger transport to
Main Roads, 2017, for further Planning and Design access or manoeuvre on
guidance on how to comply with the Manual 2nd edition, Volume the site
performance outcome. 3:
Guide to Road Design,
Department of Transport
and
Main Roads, 2016.
Note: Guidance on how to
meet the acceptable
outcome is
23
Page 24
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
available in the Road
Planning and Design
Manual 2nd edition,
Volume 3: Guide to Road
Design, Department of
Transport and
Main Roads, 2016:
1. Part 3:
a. 4.2 Traffic lanes
b. 4.8 Bicycle lanes
c. 4.9 High occupancy
vehicle (HOV) lanes
d. 4.12 Bus stops
e. 7 Horizontal alignment
f. 7.7 Super elevation
g. 7.9 Curve widening
2. Part 4:
a. 6.3 Bus Facilities
b. 5.6 Design vehicle swept
path
3. Part 4A:
a. 5 Auxiliary lanes
4. Part 4B: Roundabouts:
a. 4 Geometric design
b. 4.6 Circulating
carriageway.
AND
AO18.3 Traffic calming AO18.3 Not Applicable
devices are not installed on The development will not
roads used for buses. propose for public
passenger transport to
Note: Chapter 2 of the access or manoeuvre on
Public Transport the site.
Infrastructure Manual,
Department of Transport
and Main Roads, 2015
provides
guidance on how to comply
with this acceptable
outcome.
AND
AO18.4 Where road humps AO18.4 Not Applicable
are installed on roads The development will not
used for buses, the road propose for public
humps are designed in passenger transport to
accordance with the access or manoeuvre on
Manual of Uniform Traffic the site.
Control Devices,
Department of Transport
and Main
Roads, 2018.
24
Page 25
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
Note: Guidance on how to
meet the acceptable
outcome is
available in the Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control
Devices, Part
13:
1. Section 2, clause 2.4,
Road humps
2. Section 2, clause 2.1.2-
1, Hump profiles for bus
routes.
PO19 Development provides safe, No acceptable outcome is PO19 Complies
direct and prescribed. The proposed
convenient pedestrian access to development will provide
existing and future enhanced pedestrian
public passenger transport connectivity around the
infrastructure. site, improving the safety
of pedestrians to nearby
Note: Chapter 3 of the Public public transport
Transport Infrastructure Manual, connections.
Department of Transport and Main
Roads, 2015 provides
guidance on how to comply with this
performance outcome. In particular, it
is recommended that a pedestrian
demand analysis
be provided to demonstrate
compliance with the performance
outcome.
Refer to the SDAP Supporting
Information: Public passenger
transport infrastructure, Department of
Transport and Main
Roads, 2017, for further guidance on
how to comply with the
performance outcome.
PO20 On-site vehicular circulation AO20.1 The location of on- AO20.1 Not Applicable
ensures the site pedestrian crossings The proposed
safety of both public passenger ensures safe sight development does not
transport services distances for pedestrians propose on-site pedestrian
and pedestrians. and crossings
public passenger services.
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting
Information: Public passenger AND
transport infrastructure, Department of AO20.2 On-site circulation AO20.2 Not Applicable
Transport and Main Roads, 2017, for is designed and The proposed
further guidance on how to comply constructed so that public development does not
with the performance outcome. passenger services can propose for public
enter and leave in a passenger transport to
forward gear at all times. access or manoeuvre on
the site.
AND
25
Page 26
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
AO20.3 Development does AO20.3 Not Applicable
not result in public The proposed
passenger services development does not
movements through car propose for public
parking aisles. passenger transport to
access or manoeuvre on
the site.
PO21 Taxi facilities are provided to No acceptable outcome is PO21 Will Comply
accommodate prescribed. Taxi ranks can be provided
the demand generated by the within the Noosa
development. Marketplace where
necessary.
Note: Guidance on how to meet the
performance outcome are
available in chapter 7 of the Public
Transport Infrastructure
Manual, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2015.
Refer to the SDAP Supporting
Information: Public passenger
transport infrastructure, Department of
Transport and Main
Roads, 2017, for further guidance on
how to comply with the
performance outcome.
PO22 Taxi facilities are located and AO22.1 A taxi facility is AO22.1 Not Applicable
designed to provided parallel to the Taxi ranks can be provided
provide convenient, safe and kerb and adjacent to the within the Noosa
equitable access for main entrance. Marketplace where
passengers. necessary.
AND
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting AO22.2 Taxi facilities are AO22.2 Not Applicable
Information: Public designed in accordance Taxi ranks can be provided
passenger transport infrastructure, with: within the Noosa
Department of Transport and Marketplace where
Main Roads, 2017, for further 1. AS2890.5–1993 Parking necessary.
guidance on how to comply with the facilities – on-street
performance outcome. parking and AS1428.1–
2009 Design for access
and mobility – general
requirements for access –
new building work
2. AS1742.11–1999
Parking controls – manual
of
uniform traffic control
devices
3. AS/NZS 2890.6–2009
Parking facilities – offstreet
parking for people with
disabilities
26
Page 27
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response
4. Disability standards for
accessible public
transport 2002 made
under section 31(1) of the
Disability Discrimination
Act 1992
5. AS/NZS 1158.3.1 –
Lighting for roads and
public
spaces, Part 3.1:
Pedestrian area (category
P)
lighting – Performance
and design requirements.
PO23 Educational establishments are AO23.1 Educational AO23.1 Not Applicable
designed to establishments are The proposed
ensure the safe and efficient designed development does not
operation of public in accordance with the include an educational
passenger services and pedestrian provisions of the Planning establishment.
access. for
Safe Transport
Note: Refer to the SDAP Supporting Infrastructure at Schools,
Information: Public passenger Department of Transport
transport infrastructure, Department of and Main Roads, 2011.
Transport and Main Roads, 2017, for
further guidance on how to comply
with the performance outcome.
27