Skip to the record
Beware of cheap imitations.

Council archive · source document

PM Submission - Jenalda Handley - MCU25/0118

of 2

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                                                                             z    5

                                                                                             RECEIVED     .c

To: Assessment Manager- Noosa Shire Council Date:21/11/25                                  2 h NOV 2025    O'

Re: Application Number MCU25/0118                                               Noosa Council
Description: Development Permit for Material Change of Use by Coast2Bay fof'M- Ufipfeysn’e- A
Dwellings - Affordable Rental Premises 25 X small dwellings plus one community        0   \___
dwelling.
Site Address: 64 Lake Macdonald Drive, Cooroy Qld 4563 on Lot 2 (part) SP348613

Formal Objection to Proposed Development Application

I wish to formally object to the proposed development application based on the following
grounds:

1. Zoning Intention Ignored

   •    The land was purchased and zoned for future cemetery use.
   •    The proposed development disregards this long-standing community expectation.

2. Density Completely Out of Scale

   •    The proposal is much denser than anything in the surrounding low-density
        neighbourhood.
   •    It exceeds even medium-density standards and would set a concerning precedent for
        Cooroy and other hinterland towns.

3. Traffic and Safety Risks

   •    Dianella Court was designed for only 28 homes.
   •    It cannot safely handle the major increase in traffic, parking and turning movements
        the development would generate.

4. Poor Access to Essential Services

   •    The site is too far from Cooroy’s shops, transport and community facilities.
   •    Higher-density housing should be located closer to services to avoid transport burdens
        and social isolation.

5. Damage to Cooroy’s Character

   •    The development is incompatible with Cooroy’s village feel, low-rise character and
        sense of community.
   •    It would significantly erode the amenity enjoyed by existing residents.

6. Poor Social Planning

    •   Concentrating rental or social housing in one isolated location is poor planning
        practice.
   •    Social and affordable housing should be integrated across the community/fjOT?.
        clustered.                                                              /
                                                                              'cd
                                                                                    / 5 WV
                                                                                    x'"o?CiJura//
                                                                                       o -cords
                                                                                           ■ > V'v$z/
Full text of the other 1 page

Page 2

1. Negative Amenity Impacts

   •    The scale and density will reduce neighbourhood amenity and impact the quality of
        life for current residents.



I respectfully request that the development application be refused.




Name:


Signature^.



Address: 'I—             \                                   CM

Email (optionl)

Used in these records

About this file

File size
780 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

PM Submission - Jenalda Handley - MCU25_0118.pdf · 780 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.