Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Original source · versioned page text

2021-12-16 Ordinary Meeting Agenda

of 35

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.

ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA                                                                16 DECEMBER 2021


                 a.     The proposal is located in a medium density residential neighbourhood that
                        is predominately used for short term accommodation. The introduction of
                        additional short term accommodation within a duplex unit is not consistent
                        with the zone’s outcome to maintain the area as predominantly home to
                        permanent residents.
                 b.     The proposal seeks to establish a new short-term visitor accommodation
                        dwelling within a duplex and is not located within a well-established resort or
                        holiday units.
          3.     The proposal is not consistent with 7.2.4.2 Purpose and Overall Outcomes (2)(t)
                 and Performance Outcome PO21 of the Noosaville Local Plan Code as:
                 a.     Additional visitor accommodation in the area is likely to result in detrimental
                        impacts on the residential amenity of permanent residents.
                 b.     While the code seeks to maintain visitor accommodation in the area, it does
                        not seek to increase the extent of visitor accommodation within the area to
                        the detriment of permanent residents.
          4.     The proposal is not consistent with 9.3.5.2 Purpose and Overall Outcomes (1) and
                 (2)(f) of the Visitor Accommodation Code as:
                 a.     The proposed visitor accommodation is not appropriately located and
                        integrated with permanent residents in the area given the number and
                        density of properties currently being used for visitor accommodation and/or
                        permitted for use as visitor accommodation.
                 b.     The proposed visitor accommodation is likely to detract from the amenity
                        enjoyed by residents nearby and in the surrounding area.
          5.     The proposal does not comply with Performance Outcome PO12 of the Visitor
                 Accommodation Code and Performance Outcome PO6 of the Driveway and
                 Parking Code as insufficient car parking is proposed on site to address the likely
                 parking demands on site.
          6.     There is no need for additional short term accommodation in the area.
    B.    Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.



4   RAL21/0007 - DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FOR RECONFIGURING A LOT (1 LOT INTO
    12 LOTS) ASSESSED UNDER THE SUPERSEDED PLANNING SCHEME AT 111 LAKE
    WEYBA DRIVE, NOOSAVILLE
    In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Stewart provided the following
    declaration to the meeting of a prescribed conflict of interest in this matter:
    I, Cr Stewart, inform the meeting that I have a prescribed conflict of interest in relation to this matter as
    Kirsty Millar, the ex-wife, of Mr Bob Linke, Director of Linke and Linke Surveys Pty Ltd (the Applicant),
    donated $5000 on 12/2/20, $5000 on 6/3/2020; $1900 on 27/2/2020 and $1900 on 27/2/2020, to my
    2020 election campaign. As a result of my conflict of interest, I will now leave the meeting room while
    the matter is considered and voted on.
    That Council note the report by the Coordinator Planning to the Planning & Environment
    Committee Meeting dated 7 December 2021 regarding application RAL21/0007 for a
    Development Permit for Reconfiguring a Lot – 1 lot in 12 lots, situated at 111 Lake Weyba
    Drive Noosaville and:
    A.    Refuse the application for the following reasons:
          1.     The proposed development does not comply with Assessment Benchmark 3 of the
                 State Planning Policy (Natural Hazards, Risk and Resilience) as it does not
                 satisfactorily mitigate the bushfire risks to people and property to an acceptable or
                 tolerable level.

                                                                                                Page 15 of 35
Log in to download the original file

2021-12-16 Ordinary Meeting Agenda(PDF, 1MB).pdf · 1.1 MB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.