Council archive · source document
24-01-2020 - Appeal No. 245 of 2019 - Final Order of Judge Rackemann · 51987.2951.01
M Design & Fourteen Enterprises Pty Ltd (Appellants) v Noosa Shire Council (Respondent)
Planning and Environment Appeal No. 245 of 2019
Joint Expert Report of Coastal Engineering Experts commenced on 7 August 2019 and completed via
subsequent emails and telephone discussions between Neil Collins (NC) of BMT WBM Pty Ltd
5 (representing Noosa Shire Council) and Paul Prenzler (PP) of Omtrek Pty Ltd (representing M Design
& Fourteen Enterprises Pty Ltd).
STATEMENT TO COURT
We, the undersigned, hereby acknowledge that we have been instructed on an expert’s duty to
assist the court and that, that duty overrides any obligation we may have to any party to the
10 proceedings or to any person who is liable for our fees or expenses.
We furthermore state that no instructions were given or accepted to adopt or reject any particular
opinion in preparing this report.
BACKGROUND
A Notice of Appeal was lodged by McInnes Wilson Lawyers on 25 January 2019, on behalf of the
15 Appellants (M Design & Fourteen Enterprises Pty Ltd) against the decision by Noosa Shire Council to
refused a minor change application for additions to a detached house to include a swimming pool, deck
and other structure seaward of the coastal building line for land located at 42 Seaview Terrace, Sunshine
Beach, having a real property description of Lot 57 on RP81810 (the subject site).
The Court Order dated 13 March 2019 defines the issues in dispute in the appeal as the issues
20 identified in paragraphs 7 and 10 to 13 (inclusive) of the Notice of Appeal.
The issues in dispute relating to coastal engineering advanced by the Appellant are (adopting the
paragraph numbering in the Notice of Appeal):
10. The Proposed Changes, both now and into the future, will not result in or contribute
to any adverse impacts in relation to:
25 (a) natural coastal processes;
(b) erosion;
(c) integrity and resilience of the foreshore.
11. The Proposed Changes will provide no worsening to the existing state of the
environment and coastal hazards that might affect the Land, the immediate
30 surrounding and beyond.
12. The Proposed Changes have the potential to:
(a) reduce the risk of erosion an minimise the effect of natural coastal processes
in the locality; and
(b) improve the integrity and resilience of the foreshore in the immediate
35 locality.
13. The design and proposed implementation of the Proposed Changes:
(a) appropriately address and respond to any and all risks of erosion and natural
coastal processes and protects the environment; and
001
10
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
24-01-2020 - Appeal No. 245 of 2019 - Final Order of Judge RackemannRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.3 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.