Council archive · source document
24-01-2020 - Appeal No. 245 of 2019 - Final Order of Judge Rackemann · 51987.2951.01
0.9 Factor of Safety (failure) Color Name Unit Cohesion' Phi'
Weight (kPa) (°)
(kN/m³)
Low Strength Rock 21 25 40
Medium Strength Rock 22 25 43
Existing Residence Residual Soil/Extremely 20 25 36
24 (indicative) Weathered Rock
Proposed Pool SAND (Dense/Very 19 0 38
22
Loose SAND (24 kN/m3) Dense)
SAND (Loose) 17 0 27
20
SAND (Medium 18 0 34
18 Medium Dense or Dense SAND Dense/Dense)
Very Low Strength 20 25 38
16 Sandstone
14
12 Dense or Very Dense SAND (including zones of cemented sand ‘coffee rock’) Initial slope failure
Erosion cut*
10
8
6
4
Elevation (AHD m)
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
Medium Strength Rock
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
NOTES: Distance (m)
CLIENT PROJECT
* Approximately 60 m west of Highest Astronomical Tide (from Paul Prenzler via email 16/8, 21/8 and 11/9) McInnes Wilson Lawyers Proposed Pool, 42 Seaview Terrace
Subsurface profiles shown are indicative and based on general correlation with borehole/DCP/MASW results presented in
DRAWN
WM DATE
17/09/2019 TITLE
CASE 1:
J000867-003-R-Rev0 CHECKED DATE
EROSION CUT & INITIAL SLOPE FAILURE
GAH 17/09/2019
REV No
Refer to Figure 1 for section alignment SCALE
As shown PROJECT No
J000867 FIGURE No
B1 0 A3
073
82
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
24-01-2020 - Appeal No. 245 of 2019 - Final Order of Judge RackemannRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.3 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.