Council archive · source document
24-01-2020 - Appeal No. 245 of 2019 - Final Order of Judge Rackemann · 51987.2951.01
1.0 Factor of Safety (unacceptable/possible failure)
Existing Residence
24 (indicative)
Proposed Pool
22
Loose SAND (24 kN/m3)
20
18 Medium Dense or Dense SAND Retrogressive slope failure (extending under proposed pool supported on shallow footings, i.e. no piles)
16
14
12 Dense or Very Dense SAND (including zones of cemented sand ‘coffee rock’)
10
Reprofiled slope after previous failures
8
6
4
Elevation (AHD m)
2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
Medium Strength Rock
-12
-14
-16
-18
-20
-22
-24
-26
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Distance (m) CLIENT PROJECT
NOTES: McInnes Wilson Lawyers Proposed Pool, 42 Seaview Terrace
Subsurface profiles shown are indicative and based on general correlation with borehole/DCP/MASW results presented in
DRAWN
WM DATE
17/09/2019 TITLE
CASE 3:
J000867-003-R-Rev0 CHECKED DATE
RETROGRESSIVE UPPER SLOPE FAILURE
GAH 17/09/2019
REV No
Refer to Figure 1 for section alignment SCALE
As shown PROJECT No
J000867 FIGURE No
B3 0 A3
075
84
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
24-01-2020 - Appeal No. 245 of 2019 - Final Order of Judge RackemannRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 7.3 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.