Original source · versioned page text
Resonse to Amended Plans - John Cochrane
Attached to the e-mail Further submission from John Cochrane in response to amended plans - MCU21/0110.
Plans and drawings: the text below has words only, no drawings.
space, recreation space, bar and restaurant areas. This has not been done. The proposal is therefore significantly inefficient in planning terms. The effect of this inefficiency will be to put pressure on to either reduce the size of non-income producing areas or to increase the number of rooms in order to sustain the scale of these facilities. Indeed, the wing of rooms deleted being double loaded hotel rooms is an extremely efficient form. Its deletion has increased the proportion of single loaded corridors. I believe that if the application were to be approved, it would not be constructed in the approved from. It is likely that following applications would seek to either increase the number of rooms or reduce facilities in order to achieve economic viability. FIGURE 3 ANALYSIS OF BUILDING EFFICIECY Note – Areas may differ from application due to the inclusion of engineering items such as water tank and pool equipment. These are included for overall efficiency calculation.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.