Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

07/2173 - Operational Works - Prescribed Tidal Works Transport Type 5 - Pontoon [As Published] · 142007.2173

of 34

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

ry

ecoaccess

snvironmentat ficencas and permits
Response

Early Concurrence Agency Response

Reasons for the inciusion of development conditions

In accordance with Section 3.3.18(7) of the Integrated Planning Act 1997 and Section 27B of the Acts
Interpretation Act 1954, the reasons for the inclusion of development conditions are:

. The Environmental Protection Agency is recognised as a concurrence agency under the Integrated
Planning Amendment Regulation (No. 1) 4998 for coastal management, other than amenity and aesthetic
significance or value. Development conditions placed on the development approval for the application are
in accordance with section 106 of the Coastal Protection and Management Act 1995.

The Activity for which this development approval is issued is simply a restatement of the activity as prescribed in
the legislation at the time of issuing this development approval. Where there is any conflict between the above
description of the Activity for which this development approval is issued and the conditions as specified in this
development approval as to the scale, intensity or manner of carrying out of the Activity, then such conditions
prevail to the extent of the inconsistency.

This development approval authorises the Activity. It does not authorise environmental harm unless &
concurrence agency condition within this development approval explicitly authorises that harm, Where there is
no condition, or the development approval is silent on a matter, the lack of a condition or silence shall not be
construed as authorising harm.

As part of the concurrence agency response the following development conditions are to be attached to the
development approval:

Conditions:

Agency Interest: Coastal

1. The warks must be undertaken in accordance with drawing No. JSP-SJ-19290, issue B, dated 29
August 2007.

Additional information for applicants

It is a requirement of the Environmental Protection Act 1994 that if the owner or occupier of this site becomes
aware a Nolifiable Activity (as defined under Schedule 2 of the Environmental Protection Act 1994) is being
carried out on this land or that the land has been affected by a hazardous contaminant, they must, within twenty
two (22) business days after becoming aware the activity is being carried out, give notice to the Environmental
Protection Agency. A list of Notifiable Activities is provided within Schedule 2 of the Environmental Protection
Act 1994.

Yours sincerely

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Page 2 of 3» 09/03 Version 1.4 Environmental Protection Agency

bots S800 ON ELL8S77E £0 NOIOIE NYININGS Vai Bott L000 L9G 91

Used in these records

About this file

File size
2.0 MB (large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

07_2173 - Operational Works - Prescribed Tidal Works Transport Type 5 - Pontoon [As Published].pdf · 2.0 MB (large file)

The download may take up to a minute.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.