Original source · versioned page text
2018-08-07 S&O Agenda - Att 1 to Item 7 - Public Interest Test Report
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
Negative licensing
Local Existing Potential Residents/tenants Immediate Tourist Pensioners’ Backpackers’
government operators operators neighbours operators representative Association
bodies
Low negative Low negative Neutral Neutral Low negative Low positive Low negative Low negative
impact impact impact impact impact impact
Some benefits A small reduction Potential Two scenarios are Potential for a Tourism industry Potential for an Potential for an
accrue from in operating costs operators benefit possible. On one decrease in should benefit increase in increase in
reduction in would result from from removal of hand standards amenity through greater complaints from complaints from
administrative removal of fees barrier to entry could decline through loss of competition in the residents. residents.
burden but these but this is offset and knowledge of through removal of Council power market.
are offset by the by higher fines for “rules” prior to Council in assessing to set site
potential for non-compliance entry. However, new operators prior specific
increased and a greater higher fines apply to entering the conditions.
complaints and onus on operators for non- market and loss of
loss of fees. to ensure compliance and power to set site
compliance. there is a greater specific conditions.
onus on operators On the other hand,
to ensure residents could
compliance. benefit from
increased
competition in the
market with
improved
product/service,
greater choice and
differentiation
between providers
Overall, the analysis of costs and benefits has determined there would be a net cost in moving to a negative licensing regime. While some benefits would
accrue to operators, these are offset by higher fines for non-compliance. Other stakeholder groups would be negatively impacted as a result of loss of Council
power to set site specific conditions.
Summary and conclusions
The analysis has showed that there would be a net cost to the community in moving to a negative licensing regime. This alternative is not viable and should
be set aside.
The analysis has also determined there would be only a limited benefit to the community as a whole in moving to a co-regulation regime.
14
ATTACHMENT 1 PIT Report - Administration LL SLL 2018
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.