Council archive · source document
Information Response - 18 Sunseeker · MCU13/0080
Information Request Response Description of Proposal: Multiple Housing Type 4 – 3 units Address of Site: 18 Sunseeker Close Noosaville Application Reference: MCU13/0080 Date: 23 May 2013 Visitor Carpark The Driveways and Car Parking Code requires a minimum of 6 carparking spaces are provided on- site for the proposed development. Furthermore the Landscaping Code requires a 2m landscaped area between the frontage and the uncovered visitor carparking area. Information Required 1. In order to obtain an appropriate landscaping setback with the frontage, please amend the plans by removing the proposed visitor bay located closest to the frontage of Sunseeker close. Response The amended plans show that the visitor carparking has been reduced to 1 bay only with additional landscaping included along the frontage. Unit 3 - Extra Bedroom The submitted plan numbered A3023, revision D titled ‘Ground Floor Plan Unit 3’drawn by Steven Campbell and dated 2602/2013 depicts a 3.6m a 2.6m ‘office’ located on the ground floor of unit 3. This area is interpreted under the Noosa Plan as a third bedroom and raises the density of the site above the population density requirements. Information Required 2. Please amend the proposed unit 3 layout plan to include only 2 bedrooms, with no additional closed off rooms capable of being used as a bedroom. Response: The floor plans for unit 3 have been amended to a 3m x 2m study. The room is considered to be too small for reasonable use as a bedroom. The changes to the layout of unit 3 in addition to changes to the other units where the media rooms have a larger opening are will ensure the that proposal is not an over development of the site. Eastern Side Setback A reduced side setback is proposed on the eastern boundary adjoining the pathway. The setback distance must comply with the fire separation requirements of the BCA.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 1 page
Page 2
Information Required
3. Please demonstrate the reduced eastern side setback complies with the fire separation
requirements of the BCA.
Response:
The plans have been slightly amended to comply with the requirements of the BCA as prescribed in
the supporting document. The proposed development will comply. Conditions related to fire
separation will be included as part of the Building Approval.
Onsite Carparking Layout
Issue
The extended fire separation wall between units 1 and 2, obstruct drivers sight. These walls should be
amended to improve drivers sight distances and car turning circles.
Information Required
4. Amend the plans to minimize the projection of the fire separation wall into the driveway
corridor, and overlay the appropriate Australian Standard turning templates for each of the
proposed carparks.
Response
The firewall has been removed to allow sufficient room for turning circles which comply with the
Australian Standards.
Issue
There are concerns regarding the narrow width of the vehicular access at the front boundary of the
site.
Information Required
5. Please revise the layout plan, so as to provide a wider access near the front boundary and
facilitate two cars passing each other at the entry.
Response:
The site plan has been amended showing a wider entry at the front of the lot.
The development is impact assessable. As such notification will be sent to Council once Public
Notification has commenced. If you have any further queries please do not hesitate to call.
Regards,
Debra Wood
Town Planning Consultant
Ph: 07 38218703
Used in these records
Information Response - 18 Sunseeker.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 147 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.