Original source · versioned page text
20240930-NC-Minor change request cover letter.docx
.
e) public notification if public
notification was not required for the Complies – The proposed amendment is minor in nature
development application. and will not trigger the requirement for public
notification.
Table 1 – ‘Minor change’ criteria (Schedule 2 - Dictionary)
The proposed change represents a minor change under Schedule 1 of the Development Assessment Rules, as the
outcome does not result in ‘substantially different’ development as outlined below.
Substantially Different Criteria Response
A change may be considered to result in a substantially different development if the proposed change:
a) involves a new use Complies – the change does not involve a new use
b) results in the application applying to a new parcel Complies – the proposed change will not result in any
of land; or new parcels of land being included as part of the
application
c) dramatically changes the built form in terms of Complies – the proposed change does not involve any
scale, bulk and appearance; or notable changes to the approved built form
d) changes the ability of the proposed development Complies – the proposed change does not change the
to operate as intended; or ability for the development to operate as intended
e) removes a component that is integral to the Complies – The proposed change does not remove a
operation of the development; or component that is integral to the development
f) significantly impacts on traffic flow and the Complies – The proposed amendments will not result in
transport network, such as increasing traffic to any additional impacts not already addressed as part of
the site; or the original approval
g) introduces new impacts or increase the severity of Complies – The proposed amendment will not result in
known impacts; or increased severity of known impacts.
h) removes an incentive or offset component that Complies – the proposed change does not remove any
would have balanced a negative impact of the incentive or offset component of the proposed
development; or development.
i) impacts on infrastructure provisions. Complies – the proposed minor change does not result in
any adverse impacts on infrastructure provisions.
Table 2 – Substantially different criteria (Schedule 1 – Development Assessment Rules)
Affected Entities
The original application was required to be referred to SARA for contaminated land (unexploded ordinances) in
accordance with Schedule 10, Part 4, Division 3, Table 1, Item 1 (10.4.3.1.1). The requirements of the referral agency
conditions have been met, and as such, this minor change does not trigger referral to any ‘affected entities’.
Summary
As demonstrated above, the proposed minor change to the existing development approval represents a minor change
under s78 of the Planning Act 2016 and Schedule 1 of the Development Assessment Rules, as the proposed change does
not result in ‘substantially different development’, require additional referral agencies or change the level of assessment,
JFP Ref: M2915P Page 10
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the original