Original source · versioned page text
2021-10-12 Planning & Environment Committee Meeting Agenda
The original of this document is very large (14.0 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 OCTOBER 2021
Amenity
Performance Outcome P20(b) is relevant to this assessment and is provided below.
PO20
Development:
(a) provides a high level of residential amenity to the users of the subject site; and
(b) does not unreasonably impact on the amenity enjoyed by users of adjoining or nearby
premises, including privacy and access to sunlight.
Performance Outcome PO20 (b) seeks to that uses do not unreasonably impact on the privacy of
neighbouring properties. The rear balconies overlook 5 properties and have the potential to
negatively impact on the privacy of those surrounding dwellings. The applicant suggests some zip
screens and additional plantings to help mitigate the overlooking. However, zip screens can be rolled
up and therefore do not prevent overlooking.
The proposed rate of occupancy for the short term accommodation use is considered excessive for
the site and floor area, has significant overlooking and potential carparking issues. This
unreasonably impacts on the amenity of the neighbouring property and the residential
neighbourhood.
CONSULTATION
Internal Council Referrals
Not applicable
Public Notification
The application was publicly notified for 15 business days in accordance with the Planning Act 2016.
Five properly made submissions were received and 5 not properly made submissions. The following
table provides a summary and assessment of the issues raised by submitters.
Matters Raised Comments
The applicant proposes 8 people in each Agree. Currently each dwelling unit has 2 bedrooms
dwelling which results in 16 people on a small which generally could sleep 4 people per dwelling. The
site. This results in negative impacts to the applicant intends to increase bed numbers to 16 people
surrounding area. to accommodate the short term accommodation use
which doubles the amount of people on site.
Traffic on Hill Street is very busy. The development is being used for a residential use
and the short term use may generate some additional
traffic given the expected number of beds proposed for
the short term use. The number of beds is likely to be
less for permanent living.
Negative amenity, noise impacts from the use. Agree. The proposal has the potential to impact on
surrounding amenity, particularly given the large
number of people proposed to be accommodated on
site.
Oversupply of Short term accommodation in Agree.
Sunshine Beach.
Inconsistent and incompatible with the The submission raised valid planning matters which
provisions and intent of the Noosa Plan 2020. are agreed with.
This is a 14 page submission where various Other issues raised were not assessable matters.
impacts of Short term accommodation are
raised such as noise, traffic and the social fabric
issues.
Page 129 of 185
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.