Original source · versioned page text
2021-10-12 Planning & Environment Committee Meeting Agenda
The original of this document is very large (14.0 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 OCTOBER 2021
Page 78 of 185
PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 OCTOBER 2021
Summary and conclusions
The analysis has showed that there would be a net cost to the community in moving to a negative licensing regime. This alternative is not viable and should
be set aside.
The analysis has also determined there would be only a limited benefit to the community as a whole in moving to a co-regulation regime.
in conclusion, the identified anti-competitive provisions should be retained in full in the public interest, because--
(a) the benefit of these provisions to the community as a whole outweighs the cost; and
(b) the most appropriate way of achieving the objectives of the relevant local law (about the regulation of the prescribed activity of the operation of short
stay letting or home hosted accommodation) is by restricting competition in the way provided in these provisions,
having regard to the local government duty of good rule and local government of its local government area.
10
Attachment 7 PIT Report - Administration (Amendment) LL (No. 1) 2021 & SLL
Page 78 of 185See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.