Council archive · source document
Appendix K - Traffic Engineering Report · MCU21/0146
Traffic Engineering Report 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville Proposed Residential Development
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 44 pages
Page 2
About TTM
For 30 years, we’ve been at the centre of the
Australian development and infrastructure industry.
Our unique combination of acoustics, data, traffic
and waste services is fundamental to the success of
any architectural or development project.
We have over 50 staff, with an unrivalled depth of
experience. Our industry knowledge, technical
expertise and commercial insight allow us to deliver
an exceptional and reliable service.
T: (07) 3327 9500
F: (07) 3327 9501
E: [email protected]
Revision Record
No. Author Reviewed/Approved Description Date
1. S.Chapman / T.Lingard Draft Report 16/07/21
2. T.Lingard S.Crank – RPEQ Final Report 12/08/21
18360
3.
4.
5.
Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 2
Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 3
Contents
1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................5
1.1 Background .................................................................................................................................. 5
1.2 Scope ............................................................................................................................................ 5
1.3 Site Location ................................................................................................................................. 6
2 Proposed Development .........................................................................................................................7
2.1 Development Profile .................................................................................................................... 7
2.2 Access ........................................................................................................................................... 7
2.3 Parking.......................................................................................................................................... 7
3 Existing Transport Infrastructure ............................................................................................................8
3.1 The Road Network ........................................................................................................................ 8
3.2 Road Planning............................................................................................................................... 8
3.3 Public Transport and Pedestrian Facilities .................................................................................... 9
3.3.1 Buses ................................................................................................................................ 9
3.3.2 Pedestrians .....................................................................................................................11
3.3.3 Cyclists ............................................................................................................................11
4 Car Parking Arrangements ................................................................................................................... 12
4.1 Council Parking Supply Requirement .........................................................................................12
4.2 Proposed Parking Supply ............................................................................................................12
4.3 Car Park Layout ..........................................................................................................................14
5 Traffic Impact Assessment ................................................................................................................... 15
6 Site Access Arrangements .................................................................................................................... 16
6.1 Proposed Access Arrangement ..................................................................................................16
7 Service Vehicle Arrangements .............................................................................................................. 18
7.1 Noosa Council Requirements .....................................................................................................18
7.2 Practical Demands ......................................................................................................................18
7.2.1 Residential Use ...............................................................................................................18
7.2.2 Refuse Collection ............................................................................................................18
7.3 Proposed Service Vehicle Arrangements and Their Adequacy ...................................................18
8 Active Transport .................................................................................................................................. 19
Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 3
Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 4
8.1 Public Transport .........................................................................................................................19
8.2 Pedestrian Access .......................................................................................................................19
8.3 Cyclist Requirements ..................................................................................................................19
9 Summary and Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 20
9.1 Car Parking Arrangements..........................................................................................................20
9.2 Access Arrangements .................................................................................................................20
9.3 Service Vehicle Arrangements ....................................................................................................20
9.4 Active Transport Facilities ..........................................................................................................20
9.5 Impact on Surrounding Road Network .......................................................................................20
9.6 Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................20
Appendix A Proposed Site Plan................................................................................................................. 21
Appendix B Service Vehicle Swept Paths .................................................................................................. 22
Appendix C Road Network Upgrades ........................................................................................................ 23
Appendix D Code Responses .................................................................................................................... 24
Table Index
Table 2.1: Development Profile ......................................................................................................................... 7
Table 3.1: Local Road Hierarchy ......................................................................................................................... 8
Table 3.2: Bus Route Summary ........................................................................................................................ 10
Table 4.1: Parking Supply Requirement ........................................................................................................... 12
Table 4.2: Parking Design Requirements ......................................................................................................... 14
Table 6.1: Design Characteristics for the Driveway Crossover ......................................................................... 16
Figure Index
Figure 1.1: Site location (Source: Nearmaps) ..................................................................................................... 6
Figure 3.1: Bus Stop Location/Routes .............................................................................................................. 10
Figure 3.2: Cycle Facilities (Source: Noosa Council Interactive Mapping) ........................................................ 11
Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 4
Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 5
1 Introduction
1.1 Background
TTM Consulting has been engaged by Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd to prepare a traffic engineering
report investigating a proposed residential development located at 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville. It is
understood that a traffic engineering assessment is required as part of a Development Application
submission to Noosa Shire Council (NSC).
1.2 Scope
This report investigates the transport aspects associated with the proposed development. The scope of the
transport aspects investigated includes:
• Parking supply required to cater for development demand
• Parking layout to provide efficient and safe internal manoeuvring
• Identification of likely traffic volumes and traffic distribution from the future development
• Identification of likely traffic impact of development on the public road network
• Access configuration to provide efficient and safe manoeuvring between the site and the public road
network
• Internal road layout to provide efficient and safe internal manoeuvring for service vehicles
• Suitability of access and internal facilities to provide for pedestrian and cyclist operation
• Access to suitable level of public transport
To assess the proposed transport arrangements, the development plans have been assessed against the
following guidelines and planning documents:
• Noosa Shire Council Planning Scheme 2020, specifically:
- Transport Code
- Driveways and Parking Code
- PSP 9 Waste Management
- Interactive Mapping
• Australian Standard 2890 series
• Building Code of Australia
Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 5
Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 6
1.3 Site Location
The site is located at 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville as shown in Figure 1.1. The property description is Lot
3 on SP246584 which is currently comprised of Lot 17, 18 and 19 on SP182880. The site is located on the
north-eastern side of Hofmann Drive with frontage to Hofmann Drive. The Noosa Civic Shopping Centre is
located to the north of the site.
The subject site is zoned as ‘High density Residential Precinct’ within the ‘Noosa Business & Industry
Precinct’.
The subject site is located within NSC’s Priority Infrastructure Area (PIA) and Service Catchment.
Noosa Civic Centre
Production Street
Approximate Site Location
Rene Street
Hofmann Drive
Figure 1.1: Site location (Source: Nearmaps)
The proposed land uses for this development are summarised in the development proposal includes 96
apartments across the site with the breakdown of apartment type described in detail in Table 2.1. A site plan
prepared by Mode is provided within Appendix A.
Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 6
Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 7
2 Proposed Development
2.1 Development Profile
The development proposal includes 96 apartments across the site with the breakdown of apartment type
described in detail in Table 2.1 below. A site plan prepared by Stockwell is provided within Appendix A.
Table 2.1: Development Profile
Use Area/Qty
Apartment Type:
− 1 Bed 1 Bath 21 units
− 2 Bed 1 Bath 34 units
− 2 Bed 2 Bath 29 units
− 3 Bed 2 Bath 12 units
Total 96 units
2.2 Access
The development plan includes the following access arrangements onto Hofmann Drive:
- Modified Type B driveway access (RS-051 - IPWEAQ)
- Priority control
- Left in and left out access
2.3 Parking
The development proposal includes total of 135 car parks which include the following;
• 127 resident spaces located in the basement level
• 7 visitor spaces located at ground level.
Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 7
Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 8
3 Existing Transport Infrastructure 3.1 The Road Network All roads in the immediate vicinity of the site are administered by NSC. The hierarchy and characteristics of roads in the immediate vicinity of the site as per the NSC Local Plan Area Map 12 are shown in Table 3.1. Table 3.1: Local Road Hierarchy Road Speed Limit Lanes Classification Road Authority Hofmann Drive 50kph 2 (two-way, divided) Collector Noosa Council Rene Street 50kph 2 (two-way, divided) Collector Noosa Council Eenie Creek Road 60kph 4 (two-way, divided) Arterial Noosa Council Walter Hay Drive 60kph 4 (two-way, divided) Arterial Noosa Council *Default speed limit on unsigned roads is 50 kph in built-up areas in Queensland 3.2 Road Planning Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd have proposed several road and infrastructure upgrades to be constructed within the immediate vicinity of the development site. As shown in the plans in Appendix C, it is proposed that three new roads will be constructed linking to the southern end of Hofmann Drive along the frontage of the development site. This will include two additional intersections within the new road network providing access to Noosa Civic Shopping Centre and Walter Hay Drive. New Hofmann Drive (New Road A) connecting to the frontage of the development site will be a two lane, dual carriageway. This road will join to the southern 4-legged roundabout that will connect New Road B, New Road C and continue to the existing southern roundabout at Walter Hay Drive. Proposed New Road B will provide individual access to lots 10-16. The development will also provide service lanes to access lots 10-16. Proposed New Road C will connect the southern and northern roundabout while providing access to lots 3, 7, 8 and 9. The northern roundabout will provide access to Noosa Civic Shopping Centre and the existing northern roundabout at Walter Hay Drive. It is proposed that concrete footpaths will be provided on both sides of the new roads. A concrete footpath will also be provided on the eastern frontage of the subject site which will connect the development to Noosa Civic Shopping Centre. These upgrades external to the sit are being carried out in accordance with the existing ROL permit (RAL 18/0023) and subsequent Operational Works. Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 8 Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 9
TTM have reviewed Noosa Council’s Local Government Infrastructure Plan (LGIP) mapping for future road
network. It is understood that there are several roadway projects within the wider road network. However,
the road network upgrades in the immediate vicinity of the site as follows:
• R09 (upgraded roundabout capacity) at the intersection of Eenie Creek Road / Walter Hay Drive and
estimated to be completed 2021 – 2026.
• PW14 (connection of missing link) on Rene Street and estimated to be completed 2021 – 2026.
• PW15 (connection of missing link) on Hofmann Drive and estimated to be completed 2021 – 2026.
It is understood that there are no land dedication requirements for the subject site resulting from these
upgrades.
3.3 Public Transport and Pedestrian Facilities
3.3.1 Buses
The proposed development is located approximately 800m walking distance to the inbound and outbound
bus stops located at Noosa Civic Shopping Centre. This bus stop services the 5824, 622, 628, 629, 632 bus
routes operated by Translink. This bus stop also services route 5824 which is a Sunshine Coast school bus
service and does not service the public. This bus stop operates approximately 78 bus services on a typical day
providing suitable connectivity to the public transport network within the Sunshine Coast area and higher
frequented Translink services. A summary of the bus stop location and routes are shown in Figure 3.1 below.
Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 9
Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 10
Noosa Civic Shopping
Centre Bus Stop – Routes
5824, 622, 628, 629, 632
Site Location
Figure 3.1: Bus Stop Location/Routes
Table 3.2 summarises the various bus routes, areas serviced by them and the timings of the operation.
Table 3.2: Bus Route Summary
Bus Route Servicing Operating Times Frequency (Approx.)
622 Noosa Junction, Peregian 5:55AM – 5:35PM (Monday – Friday) 60 min (peak and non-peak)
Springs, Coolum, Airport, 6:52AM – 5:35PM (Weekends & Public Holidays)
Maroochydore
628 Parklands, Tewantin, 7:08AM – 6:08PM (Monday – Friday) 60 min (peak and non-peak)
Noosa Civic, Noosa 7:08AM – 6:08PM (Weekends & Public Holidays)
Junction
629 Tewantin, Noosa Civic, 7:50AM – 5:50PM (Monday – Friday) 60 min (peak and non-peak)
Noosa Heads, Noosa 8:50AM – 4:50PM (Weekends & Public Holidays)
Junction
632 Cooran, Pomona, Cooroy, 8:35AM, 1:15PM, 6:25PM (Monday – Friday) 5 hours (only 3 services are
Tewantin, Noosa Civic, 8:35AM, 1:15PM, 6:25PM (Weekends & Public operated daily)
Noosa Junction Holidays)
Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 10
Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 11
3.3.2 Pedestrians Formal pedestrian footpaths are located along the southern side of Hofmann Drive which connects to Rene Street, Eenie Creek Road and the Noosa Civic Shopping Centre. Formal pedestrian footpaths are proposed to be provided along the site frontage on Hofmann Drive which will facilitate access to the pedestrian network within the development. It is also proposed that a formalised pedestrian footpath will be constructed adjacent to the eastern frontage of the site providing access to the Noosa Civic Shopping Centre. Pedestrian access to the development is considered suitable due to the numerous pedestrian facilities within the vicinity of the site. 3.3.3 Cyclists Dedicated on-street cycle lanes are located along both sides of Hofmann Drive and Rene Street. The Noosa Council Bicycle Path Overlays identifies that the on-street bicycle lanes and pathways in the immediate vicinity of the site are the primary bicycle routes used which are illustrated in Figure 3.2. The existing bicycle network is expected to satisfy Noosa Councils desired level of cycle connectivity. Figure 3.2: Cycle Facilities (Source: Noosa Council Interactive Mapping) Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 11 Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 12
4 Car Parking Arrangements
4.1 Council Parking Supply Requirement
Table 4.1 below sets out the NSC standards in terms of car parking provision. The parking standards are
based on rates set out in the Noosa Council Plan 2020 ‘Driveways and Parking Code’ for multiple dwellings
units (small dwellings no more than 100m2 GFA) within a centre zone. For a small dwelling in a centre zone
the car parking rate is also the maximum rate.
Table 4.1: Parking Supply Requirement
Land Use Council Requirement Extent Requirement Provision
1 Bedroom unit 1 covered space up to 2 21 units 21
bedrooms
2 Bedroom unit 1 covered space up to 2 63 units 63 127 (covered resident
bedrooms spaces)
3 Bedroom unit 2 covered spaces for 3 or 12 units 24
more bedrooms
Residential Visitors N/A N/A 0 7
Total 108 134
Australians Standard AS2890.6, Table B1, notes the provisions regarding the number of required accessible
car spaces for Australia are given in Building Code of Australia. In accordance with the BCA requirements,
class 2 buildings do not require PWD bays. The development proposed 1 PWD parking bay.
Noosa Council Plan 2020 ‘Driveways and Parking Code’ specifies that motorcycle parking spaces for an
accommodation activity within a centre zone be provided at a rate of one motorcycle parking space per two
dwellings should be provided, a total of 48 spaces for the development. No motorcycle bays are provided as
part of the proposed development.
4.2 Proposed Parking Supply
It is intended that 127 spaces will be assigned to residents within the basement level and 7 spaces allocated
to visitors at the ground floor level.
Residential spaces
The development proposed a total of 127 residential parking spaces a surplus of 19 spaces to the maximum
requirement in accordance with the Noosa Council Plan 2020 ‘Driveways and Parking Code’. This is
considered reasonable based on the following;
• 2016 Census data for Noosa heads notes that 37.5% of occupied private dwellings had one registered
motor vehicle garaged or parked at their address, 40.8% had two registered motor vehicles and 13.6%
had three or more registered motor vehicles.
Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 12
Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 13
• The Census data also states that the Noosa Heads area has an ‘Average motor vehicles per dwelling’ of
1.7. Resulting in a potential total of 163 vehicles for the proposed 96 dwelling units. Given the likelihood
of residents owning more than 1 vehicle it is considered pragmatic to provide additional spaces to the
maximum requirement, to accommodate the likely practical parking demand of the development
• No on-street parking currently exists along Hofmann Drive, however a large carriageway width exists
with the on-road cycle lane, making it possible, although illegal to park on Hofmann Drive. Providing
additional residential spaces within the basement level will encourage residents with surplus private
vehicles to park within the development and not along Hofmann Drive resulting in safety issues and an
adverse impact to the external road network.
• No motorcycle parking is currently proposed for the residential development. By providing a surplus of
19 residential car spaces to the requirement it is expected that any motorcycle parking can occur within
these additional bays. Allowing for the flexibility of the bays to be used by both motorcycles or additional
private vehicles.
• Prior to the further improvements to the public transport accessibility and frequency and the result in
modal shift towards these alternative modes of transport the surplus parking spaces are considered
reasonable and necessary to accommodate the practical parking demand of the development.
• The spaces are out of view of the public and will not generate additional parking not associated with the
residential development.
Visitor Spaces
The ‘Driveways and Parking Code’ does not provide a visitor parking rate for multiple dwelling units within a
centre zone. However, the NSC pre-lodgement notes Ref: PLM20/0043 acknowledges that ‘it would seem
reasonable to provide some car parking for visitors’ in leu of the maximum parking rate specified in the code.
The comparable visitor rate of 1 space per 4 dwelling units for multiple unit dwellings not within a centre
zone would require a total of 24 spaces. 7 visitor spaces are proposed for the development and this is
considered reasonable to accommodate the expected visitor parking demand within the development
located within a centre zone.
Overall, the proposed visitor parking provisions are considered suitable for the proposed development.
Motorcycle spaces
The practical parking requirement for motorcycles of the residential development is expected to be far less
than 48 spaces required in accordance with the ‘Driveways and Parking Code’ and any motorcycle parking
can occur within the surplus residential parking spaces.
Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 13
Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 14
4.3 Car Park Layout
Table 4.2 identifies the characteristics of the proposed parking area with respect to the Noosa Council
requirements. The last column identifies the compliance of each design aspect. Where compliance with
Council is not achieved, further information is provided below.
Table 4.2: Parking Design Requirements
Design Aspect Minimum Council Standard Proposed Provision Compliance
(AS2890.1)
Parking space length:
− Standard bay 5.4m 5.4m Compliant
− PWD Space 5.4m 5.4m Compliant
Parking space width:
− Residential 2.4m 2.4m Compliant
− Visitor 2.6m 2.6m Compliant
− PWD Space 2.4m + 2.4m ‘Shared Area’ 2.4m + 2.4m ‘Shared Area’ Compliant
Aisle Width:
− Resident 5.8m 6.2m Compliant
− Visitor 5.8m 6.1m Compliant
− Circulating 6.1 (including 300mm 6.7m Compliant
Road/Ramp clearance to walls)
Parking envelope clearance Space 0.3m clear of wall Space 0.3m clear of wall Compliant
– space adjacent to wall
Maximum Gradient:
− Parking bay 1:20 (5.0%) Flat Compliant
− Parking aisle 1:16 (6.25%) Flat Compliant
− Ramp 1:4 (25%) 1:6 (16.7%) Compliant
Maximum Change in Grade 1:8 (12.5%) summit 1:8 (12.5%) Compliant
1:6.67 (15.0%) sag 1:8 (12.5%) Compliant
Parking Aisle Extension 1m beyond last bay 1m beyond last bay Compliant
Height Clearance
− General Min. 2.2m 2.5m Compliant
The development proposal complies with ‘AS2890.1’ requirements. TTM Drawing 21BRT0372-02 included in
Appendix B demonstrates that two vehicles can traverse past each other on the curved section of the ramp
and at the bottom of the ramp to the internal aisles. Vehicle priority will be addressed in in detailed design
with signs and line marking.
Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 14
Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 15
5 Traffic Impact Assessment The RTA’s ‘Guide to Traffic Generating Developments’ recommends, for planning purposes, adopting a peak hour traffic generation rate in the range of 0.4 to 0.65 for medium density dwellings. A conservative rate of 0.5 trips per dwelling has been applied for the assessment of the proposed development. This equates to approximately 48vph (in+out) in the AM and PM peak hour periods. This is based on a total of 96 dwellings as per the development summary. The 48vph (in+out) are expected to have minimal effect to the external road network. Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd have proposed several road and infrastructure upgrades connecting to Hofmann Drive as noted in Section 3.2 and the proposed works mitigates the generation of the proposed development. Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 15 Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 16
6 Site Access Arrangements 6.1 Proposed Access Arrangement It is proposed that vehicular access for the development will be provided via a 6.2m wide modified Type B driveway crosser onto Hofmann Drive. NSC revert to the standard drawings published by the Institute of Public Works Engineering Australia, Queensland (IPWEAQ) for crossover design. In regards to other key access parameters not specified in the Noosa Council Plan 2020 ‘Driveways and Parking Code’, AS2890.1 and AS2890.2 have been referred too. Table 6.1: Design Characteristics for the Driveway Crossover Design Aspect NSC & AS2890.1 Requirement Proposed Provision Compliance Crossover Width Type B: 6.0 – 9.0m 6.2m Compliant Minimum Intersection 6m from tangent point of kerb >6m Compliant Separation Sight Distance Ideally 83m, minimum 65m > 83m Compliant Pedestrian Visibility Splays 2m x 2.5m on exit side 2m x 2.5m on exit side Compliant Entry Queue Capacity 24m (4 cars) 6m (1 cars) Performance Solution Gradient of first 6m 1:20 (5%) 1:20 (5%) Compliant The development proposal generally complies with the IPWEA and AS2890 requirements; however, the following aspects of the access design have been resolved with alternative solutions: Driveway form To ensure pedestrian crossing distances are kept to a minimum the entry splay of the proposed access has been designed below the standard of Type B Heavy Duty Vehicle crossing. The entry splay exceeds the requirements for residential vehicles in accordance with the IPWEA standard drawings and can accommodate the entry manoeuvre of a Waste Collection Vehicle (WCV) entering the development as illustrated in TTM Standard Drawing 20BRT0372-01 included in Appendix B. The exiting splay is designed in accordance with a Type B Heavy Duty Vehicle crossing. Queuing The proposal provides a minimum 1 vehicle queuing prior to the first conflict point of the visitor parking. This is 3 vehicles below the requirements under AS2890.1 requirements. It should be noted that the queuing provision requirements outlined in AS2890.1 are based on the number of carparks and does not take into account the land use or development traffic generation/ space turnover. As detailed in Section 5, it is expected that the peak vehicle movements into/out of the site will be 48vph during the peak-hour periods. The probability (using the Poisson distribution method) of more than 1 vehicle entering the site at the same time (or say within a 30 second period whilst a car is manoeuvring in/out of the first visitor parking space) and all requiring to queue in advance of the first internal conflict point, extending back onto Hofmann Drive, is less than 1%. As such, the proposed internal queuing capacity of 1 vehicle is sufficient to cater for the 99th percentile entry queue of the site and is therefore considered acceptable. Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 16 Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 17
With respect to entry queue capacity, it is noted that the unit dwellings and associated parking are low- turnover residential parking spaces, which will typically operate on a tidal basis. Based on the above assessment using the Poisson distribution method the queuing provision of 1 vehicle is considered adequate for the proposed development. Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 17 Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 18
7 Service Vehicle Arrangements 7.1 Noosa Council Requirements The Noosa Council Plan 2020 does not stipulate specific servicing requirements for multi-unit residential developments and no specific requirements are set for the number of service vehicle bays. It is expected that the largest vehicle expected to access the site will be a Waste Collection Vehicle (WCV). The Noosa Council Waste Management Planning Scheme Policy PSP9 requires that adequate provisions be made for the standing, parking, loading and unloading, access and manoeuvring of service vehicles within the development site. 7.2 Practical Demands 7.2.1 Residential Use It is expected that residential furniture removal and general servicing will occur via a Medium Rigid Vehicle (MRV). Typical of the requirements specified via other Councils within the surrounding regions. 7.2.2 Refuse Collection Residential refuse is to be collected by Noosa Council Waste Services. As per NSC’s Waste Management PSP9 a front loading WCV is required to access the development site. Servicing is expected to occur a maximum of 2 times per week. Once per week for general waste collection and once every two weeks for recycling. 7.3 Proposed Service Vehicle Arrangements and Their Adequacy Assuming 1 year leases for each unit, a conservative assessment of the furniture vehicle requirements for the site identifies that up to 2 furniture vehicles will access the site per week. In addition to the two refuse vehicles, this equates to an estimated demand of 4 service vehicles per week, less than one vehicle per day. TTM have undertaken a swept path analysis of a WCV travelling entering, standing and exiting the site. This manoeuvre is shown in TTM Drawing 20BRT0372-01 included in Appendix B demonstrating the WCV can enter and exit the site safely in a forward gear. A dedicated aisle / standing area is provided adjacent the ramp for service vehicles. Servicing will occur within this area without blocking or impeding parking spaces or internal aisles. Servicing is expected to occur outside of peak hours when the internal traffic flows will be very low, particularly for the 7 visitor spaces located at ground level. The required manoeuvring of the WCV (largest service vehicles expected to access the site) is not expected to have an adverse impact on the internal operation of the site. Overall, the proposed service vehicle arrangements are considered appropriate for the site. Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 18 Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 19
8 Active Transport 8.1 Public Transport Access to public transport from the site is considered suitable, due to the presence of the bus stop located at the Noosa Civic Shopping Centre approximately 800m walking distance north of the site, and its connectivity to Coolum, Maroochydore, Noosa Heads, Peregian Springs, Tewantin. The Noosa Business Centre contemplates the delivery of a Sub Regional Transit Facility (on Lot 24) in the future which is intended to function as an integrated public transport node, which will significantly increase public transport accessibility for residents within the Noosa Business Centre. The specifics of the facility will be subject to further investigation and planning with the State Government. As shown in the plans included in Appendix C, a proposed concrete footpath is to be constructed on the eastern frontage of the site which will allow pedestrians and cyclists a new route to access the Noosa Civic Shopping Centre existing bus stop and future public transport facilities. 8.2 Pedestrian Access Pedestrian access to the site is considered suitable with several pedestrian access points available along the western frontage of the site connecting to the existing footpath along Hofmann Drive. Additionally, due to the nature of the development, vehicular movements are expected to be low volume and low speed. As such, shared use of the vehicle access and circulation aisle for pedestrian movements is appropriate and acceptable. 8.3 Cyclist Requirements The Noosa Council Plan 2020 ‘Driveways and Parking Code’ specifies that for an accommodation activity within a centre zone, one bicycle space per two dwellings should be provided. As the development comprises of apartments, it is assumed there will be sufficient space within each dwelling to store bicycles for resident use. Visitors to the site will also be able to store their bicycle at each dwelling for the duration of the visit. Storage boxes are also provided throughout the basement parking level which could be used for residential bicycle storage. 127 storage boxes are provided, which is expected to accommodate the requirement for 48 bicycle spaces. Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 19 Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 20
9 Summary and Conclusions 9.1 Car Parking Arrangements Overall, the proposed parking provisions site and the proposed additional residential parking spaces are considered suitable for the proposed development. 9.2 Access Arrangements Overall, the 6.2m wide modified Type B driveway crosser onto Hofmann Drive considered suitable for the proposed development. 9.3 Service Vehicle Arrangements Overall, the proposed service vehicle arrangements are considered adequate to meet the needs of the proposed development. The required manoeuvring of the WCV (largest service vehicles expected to access the site) is not expected to have an adverse impact on the internal operation of the site. 9.4 Active Transport Facilities The current public transport infrastructure and proposed site provisions for pedestrian/bicycle facilities is considered adequate for the development. 9.5 Impact on Surrounding Road Network The proposed development is not considered to impact the operation or safety of the external road network. The road upgrades proposed by Stockwell Development Group Pty Ltd will mitigate the generation of the proposed development. 9.6 Conclusion Based on the assessment contained within this report, TTM see no traffic engineering reason why the relevant approvals should not be granted. Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville 20 Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 21
ttm Appendix A Proposed Site Plan Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 22
2 19°4 0
E
E
OP
227 1
SW
NOOSA CIVIC SHOPPING CENTER E
'3 5"
SW E
2 E
DA2 00 SW E
E
E
SW
OP
EXISTING OPTIC LINE E
SW
7.00 0
SW E
EXISTING STORMWATER LINE E
6.00 0
E
SW
E
EXISTING UNDERGROUND '4 5"
SW E 1 19°1 6
5.00 0
ELECTRICAL LINE 41 0
5 5
2 06°4 9
OP
E
25 405
E
SW E
EXISTING STORMWATER MANHOLE S W A LE TYPE 3A
'4 5"
E
SW
7.3 0
E
REFER LANDSCAPE SW E
TYPE 3B
7.3 3
ARCHITECTS' DRAWINGS FOR
OP
LANDSCAPING AREA
BIO RETENTION 2
TYPE 2B D A 201
OP
36°13'55"
TYPE 2A
SETBA
69709
PERGOLA
10000
PERGOLA
2 13°0 3
78 661
CK
5.00 POOL
TYPE 2B
'3 0"
0 PUMP
16600
OP
4000
COMMUNAL
300 WC
RECREATION AREA TYPE 2A BUILDING C
SET 0
BAC
K
POOL
OP
OP
OP OP
5107 '
TYPE 2A
7
8
OP
60°1
OP TYPE 1A CVJ
OP
8 45
OP
SP 182
DA201
OP OP
1
OP
3
FF L. 5.
2 08°4 4
TYPE 2A
5 3
35 800
TYPE 2C
TYPE 2A
'3 5"
MANAGER
L INE O
TYPE 1A
TYPE 2B SEATING
F ROO
TYPE 2A LETTER
BOXES 5
REFUSE TYPE 2C
TYPE 3A
F OVE
BUILDIN TYPE 3A TYPE 2B TYPE 1A TYPE 2A TYPE 2C
GA PUMP
R
FFL . 5.3
5
TYPE 2C
TYPE 1A
TYPE 1A
FFL. 5.35
BUILDING B 8 CARPARKS
TYPE 2A FFL 5.25
TYPE 2A
MSB
TYPE 1B TYPE 2C
TYPE 2A TYPE 1A 4.000
PADMOUNT TYPE 1A
W
TRANSFORMER 3 TYPE 1B
328°
52 SP 246583 1:5
1163 ' 1:8 TO
RAMP ENT
3 W
BASEM 3000
328 °38
W '30" SETBACK
1:20
265 71 BIO RETENTION
S W
215°32'
25884
10000
5.000
SIGNAGE
8000
W
EXISTING WATER
S
LINE
6000
WATER METE
S
W
318°25' R
S
W 7°5
30 8' W
BOOSWTER
EXISTING SEWER MANHOLE 26571 W
313°11'35" 307°58'
W
W
314°49'50"
W
W W
19232 8657 W
W
S
S
26571 29380
S
S
EXISTING SEWER LINE
4.5 98
S
S
S
S
S
HOFMANN DRIVE
4.8 8
5.0 6
W 1 JJ Ric hards Front Lift (2020) JJ Ric hards Front Lift (2020)
SW
E
EXISTING ELETRICAL LINE DA200 EXISTING WATER METER
EXISTING STORMWATER
EXISTING WATER LINE
LINE
BRISBANE NOOSA APARTMENT SITE PLAN Project No: 20225
Plaza Level, Mosaic HOFMANN DRIVE, Date:
826 Ann St NOOSA Scale: 1 : 400@ A3
Fortitude Valley QLD 4006 Drawn / Check: Author
Checker
T +61 7 3253 9900 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL DA100
[email protected]
These designs and plans are the copyright of MODE DESIGN Corp. Pty Ltd and cannot be reproduced without written Do not scale off this drawing
permission
Page 23
10 00
SETBA
10000
OUTLIN
CK
BUILDING C
E OF B
UIL DIN
3
G
SP 246583
ABOVE
CVJ
8 45
SP 182
STORA
GE CAG
ES
1000
B85Vehicle(Realist cmin radius) (20 4)
STORAGE CAGES
40 CARPARKS
2400
CARPARK TYPICAL
B85Vehicle(Realsit cmin radius) (20 4)
125 CARS 300
RL 2.200
300
STORA
GE CAG
1:8
ES
1 :5
STORAGE CAGES
1 :5
OUTLIN
E OF BU D LEVE
L
ILDING GROUN
BUILDING A ABOVE RAMP
TO
3000
OUTLINE OF BUILDING ABOVE SETBACK
SETBACK
10000
BUILDING B
HOFMANN DRIVE
BRISBANE NOOSA APARTMENT BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN Project No: 20225
Plaza Level, Mosaic HOFMANN DRIVE, Date:
826 Ann St NOOSA Scale: 1 : 400@ A3
Fortitude Valley QLD 4006 Drawn / Check: Author
Checker
T +61 7 3253 9900 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL DA105
[email protected]
These designs and plans are the copyright of MODE DESIGN Corp. Pty Ltd and cannot be reproduced without written Do not scale off this drawing
permission
Page 24
Appendix B Service Vehicle Swept Paths Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 25
213°03
'30"
16600
OP
4000 COMMUNAL
RECREATION AREA TYPE 2A BUILDING C
POOL
OP
OP
OP
TYPE 2A
TYPE 1A CVJ
845
SP182
3
FFL. 5
208°44
TYPE 2A
.35
35800
'35"
MANAGER
LINE O
SEATING
F ROO
LETTER
BOXES 5
REFUSE TYPE 2C
F OVE
TYPE 3A
TYPE 3A TYPE 2B TYPE 1A TYPE 2A TYPE 2C
R
PUMP
FFL. 5.35
BUILDING B 8 CARPARKS
FFL 5.25
TYPE 1B TYPE 2C
TYPE 2A TYPE 1A 4.000
TYPE 1A
3 TYPE 1B
SP 246583 1:5
1:8 TO
RAMP NT
BASEM
E 3000
SETBACK
1:20
BIO RETENTION
215°32'
25884
10000
SIGNAGE
8000
6000
WATER METE
318°25' R
W 7°58
30 ' W
BOOSWTER
26571 W
W 313°11'35" 307°58'
W 314°49'50"
W W
19232 8657 W
W
26571 29380
4.58
4.59
S
S
HOFMANN DRIVE
JJ Richards Front Lift (2020)
1
SW
DA200 EXISTING WATER METER
EXISTING STORMWATER
LINE
10.507
JJ Richards Front Lift (2020)
Overall Length 10.507m
Overall Width 2.490m
Overall Body Height 4.300m
Min Body Ground Clearance 0.150m
PRELIMINARY Track Width
Lock-to-lock time
2.490m
5.00s
ADVICE ONLY Curb to Curb Turning Radius
Clearance Envelope
10.800m
0.500m
9 August 2021 1.938 1.94 2.76 1.355
SCALE PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER ORIGINAL SIZE
0 4 8 12 16 20m
TTM CONSULTING PTY LTD 17 -19 HOFMANN DR, NOOSAVILLE 20BRT0372 A3
ABN 65 010 868 621 DRAWING TITLE DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
SCALE 1:400 AT ORIGINAL SIZE
LEVEL 8, 369 Ann Street, BRISBANE QLD 4000
NORTH CLIENT P.O. BOX 12015, BRISBANE QLD 4003 20BRT0372-01 B
VEHICLE SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS
B 09-08-21 BASE PLAN REVISED AH TL SC
STOCKWELL DEVELOPMENT T: (07) 3327 9500 F: (07) 3327 9501 JJ RICHARDS FRONT LIFT DESIGN VEHICLE DATE SHEET
A 05-08-21 ORIGINAL ISSUE AH TL SC E: [email protected] W: www.ttmgroup.com.au 9 Aug 2021 1 OF 1
REV. DATE AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION DRAWN CHECKED APPROVED
Page 26
CVJ CVJ
845 845
SP182 SP182
B85 Vehicle (Realistic min radius)
(20 4)
B85 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (20 4)
1:8
1:8
STORAGE CAGES 1:5 STORAGE CAGES 1:5
1:5 1:5
B9 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (20 4) D LEV
EL B9 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (20 4) LEVEL
OUN OUND
TO GR TO GR
RAMP 3000 RAMP 3000
SETBACK SETBACK
10000
10000
5.2 B99 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004) 4.91 B85 Vehicle (Realistic min radius) (2004)
Overall Length 5.200m Overall Length 4.910m
Overall Width 1.940m Overall Width 1.870m
Overall Body Height 1.878m Overall Body Height 1.421m
Min Body Ground Clearance 0.272m Min Body Ground Clearance 0.159m
PRELIMINARY Track Width
Lock-to-lock time
1.840m
4.00s 0.92 2.8
Track Width
Lock-to-lock time
1.770m
4.00s
0.95 3.05 Curb to Curb Turning Radius 5.750m
ADVICE ONLY Curb to Curb Turning Radius
Clearance Envelope
6.250m
0.300m Clearance Envelope 0.300m
9 August 2021
SCALE PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER ORIGINAL SIZE
0 4 8 12 16 20m
TTM CONSULTING PTY LTD 17 -19 HOFMANN DR, NOOSAVILLE 20BRT0372 A3
ABN 65 010 868 621 DRAWING TITLE DRAWING NUMBER REVISION
SCALE 1:400 AT ORIGINAL SIZE
LEVEL 8, 369 Ann Street, BRISBANE QLD 4000
NORTH CLIENT P.O. BOX 12015, BRISBANE QLD 4003 20BRT0372-02 A
VEHICLE SWEPT PATH ANALYSIS
STOCKWELL DEVELOPMENT T: (07) 3327 9500 F: (07) 3327 9501 B85 & B99 DESIGN VEHICLE DATE SHEET
A 09-08-21 ORIGINAL ISSUE AH TL SC E: [email protected] W: www.ttmgroup.com.au 9 Aug 2021 1 OF 1
REV. DATE AMENDMENT DESCRIPTION DRAWN CHECKED APPROVED
Page 27
Appendix C Road Network Upgrades Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 28
EE
LEGEND: PROPOSED BOUNDARIES NIE
CR
EE
EXTENT OF WORKS BOUNDARIES
KR
OA 1856-R42
D
AD
EE K RO
IE CR
LOT 4 EE EEN
SP246584 NIE
CR
EE
KR
OA
D
LOT 1 WA
SP222982 LTE
RH LOT 23
AY
DR
IVE
RIVE
HOFMANN D
EXISTING NOOSA CIVIC
SHOPPING PRECINCT LOT 147
1856-R41 NPW889
LOT 2
1856-R61
LOT 21
1856-R60
1856-R40
HO
T LOT 19 LOT 3
FM
E
SP246584
RENE STREE
HAY DRIV
AN
LOT 18
N DR LOT 17
LOT 3
IVE
WALTER
DC
LOT 7
OA
WR
NE
1856-R38
NE
LOT 4
W
1856-R39
HO
FM
LOT 5
AN
LOT 6 LOT 7
ND
LOT 8 RP46782
LOT 15 RIV
E LOT 9
1856-R37 NE
LOT 5 W
RO
SP222982 1856-R59 AD
LOT 16 A
LOT 14 1856-R58
NE
W
LOT 10
ROAD B
1856-R57
LOT 13
LOT 11 LOT 2
RP160983
LOT 12
1856-R36
VE
DRI
AY
RH
1856-R35
LTE
WA
PROJECT: JOB NUMBER
REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY CHKD DRAWN
I GDETAL
IS SCALE APPROVED PROPOSED SUBDIVISION 1856
A 19-02-20 FOR APPROVAL MM CL AT NOOSA CIVIC, WALTER HAY DRIVE
B 25-08-20 REVISED FOR APPROVAL - WALTER HAY DRIVE TURN AROUND MM CL DATUM AHD SHEET: 4 OF 42
0 40 80 120 160 200m FOR STOCKWELL PTY LTD
C
D
21-09-20
15/10/20
REVISED FOR NOOSA COUNCIL DRAFT CONDITIONS
REVISED AS PER COUNCIL RFI [29/09/20]
MM
MM
CL
CL
DESIGN MM ................. DRAWING NUMBER REV
DRAWING TITLE:
E 23/11/20 REVISED AS PER COUNCIL RFI MEETING MM CL DRAWN MM Director: CAMERON LANDRETH
SCALE 1:4000 A3
F 10-02-21 REVISED FOR CONSTRUCTION DTB TS DESIGN CHECK (RPEQ 19358) p 07 5443 8285 OVERALL WORKS LAYOUT PLAN R33 F
CL
This drawing is not to be copied or amended without written permission from e [email protected] w www.barlowshelley.com.au
DATE 13-09-19 ISSUE FOR CONSTRUCTION a PO Box 899, Maroochydore,4558 ABN 89 215 591 077
Barlow Shelley Consulting Engineers
Page 29
ttm Appendix D Code Responses Site: 17-19 Hofmann Drive, Noosaville Reference: 20BRT0372
Page 30
Driveways Table 9.4.1.3 Criteria for assessment (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Comments
PO1 AO1.1 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
Vehicular access does not adversely impact Vehicular access is located and designed in Refer to Section 6.0 of the TTM report.
on safety, capacity and operations of the accordance with the current Australian
existing or planned road network, cycleways Standards for Parking Facilities.
or pedestrian pathway systems
AO1.2 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
Only one footpath crossing is provided. Refer to Section 6.0 and Appendix A of TTM report
Editor’s Note— Justification for additional
driveways may need to be supported by a
detailed Traffic Study.
AO1.3 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
Driveways, have a maximum grade in Refer to Section 6.0 of TTM report.
accordance with Council’s standard
requirements.
PO2 AO2.1 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
Driveways and crossovers Design and construction of driveways, Refer to Section 6.0 of TTM report.
are suitable and safe for their intended use; including across the footpath, is in accordance
and match Council infrastructure. with Council Standard Drawings as
appropriate for the particular type of
development as annotated on the drawings.
Page 31
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Comments
AO2.2 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
The change of grades in driveways and ramps Refer to Section 4.3 and Section 6.0 of TTM report.
is in accordance with Council’s Standard
Drawings.
PO3 AO3.1 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
The number of driveways across pedestrian Design of multi-tenanted developments include Refer to Section 4.0 and Section 6.0 of TTM report.
footpaths is minimised. shared driveways and parking areas.
AO3.2 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
Driveways are located so they abut existing Refer to Section 6.0, Appendix A and Appendix C of TTM
driveways of adjoining development where report.
practicable and reciprocal easements are
created to reduce the sealed driveway width.
PO4 AO4 Not Applicable
Vehicular access does not adversely impact Footpath and kerb crossings are located clear Refer to Landscaping and Stormwater Report
on the capacity, operations and maintenance of existing stormwater inlet structures, water
of the existing infrastructure. and sewerage infrastructure fittings, any other
exiting utility infrastructure, existing
landscaping and vegetation.
PO5 AO5 Not Applicable
Vehicular access does not adversely impact Vehicular access avoids disturbance to the Refer to Landscaping and Environmental Report
on the health and integrity of existing tree protection zone of trees on public land.
landscaping or native vegetation, where
possible.
Page 32
Strategic Transport Network Table 9.4.7.3 Criteria for assessable development
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Comments
PO1 AO1.1 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
Traffic generation from development is considered in a Where the development leads to the need to Refer to Section 3.2 and Section 5.0 of TTM report.
localised and a Shire wide context to ensure that— increase transport infrastructure in the Shire,
the development contributes to the transport
1. the transport network has the capacity to network in accordance with Council’s
safely and efficiently accommodate infrastructure network planning.
projected movements;
Editor’s Note— Council may require the
2. development does not have an adverse
preparation of a Transport Impact
impact upon the functioning of the road
Assessment Report.
network; and
3. development includes measures to AO1.2 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
improve transport options rather than Development provides for high trip generating Refer to Section 1.3 and Section 3.3 of TTM report.
relying on the widening of roads. land uses, such as higher density residential
development and employment generators, to
be located in and around activity centres and
around major public transport hubs.
PO2 AO2.1 Not Applicable
Development respects the road hierarchy and supports Arterial and distributor roads are designed so Refer to Planning Report.
the intended function of adjacent and nearby roads. they can operate with acceptable volumes of
traffic during peak times.
Editor’s Note — The Noosa Shire road hierarchy is
depicted on Regional Infrastructure Overlay Maps.
AO2.2 Not Applicable
Collector and local streets are provided to Refer to Planning Report.
support short trips for local traffic moving in
and between neighbourhoods.
Page 33
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Comments
AO2.3 Not Applicable
Local streets are designed to discourage Refer to Planning Report.
through traffic and traffic is channelled
towards collector streets to ensure that traffic
volumes on local streets are kept low.
AO2.4 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
A collector street is provided parallel to Refer to Section 1.3 and Section 3.3. of TTM report.
arterials particularly where they pass through
centres.
AO2.5 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
Appropriate width of road and verge is Refer to Section 6.0 of the report. TTM report
provided to allow streets to perform their
designated functions in the street network.
PO3 No acceptable outcome provided Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
Development access does not compromise the Refer to Section 5.0 of TTM report.
functions of particular roads as indicated in the road
hierarchy, and does not adversely impact on the safety,
capacity and operations of the road system.
Page 34
Transport Connectivity Table 9.4.7.3 Criteria for assessable development (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Comments
PO4 No acceptable outcome provided Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
The transport network, including roads
and pathways, has high levels of Refer to Section 3.0 and Section 8.0 of TTM report.
connectivity, both within the
development site and to the
surrounding area.
PO5 AO5.1 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
Development is designed to facilitate Development is designed and arranged to:
efficient, safe and accessible bus Refer to Section 3.0 and Section 8.0 of TTM report.
services that connect to existing and 1. provide on-site or off-site public transport facilities, having
future public passenger transport regard to the specific nature and scale of development,
facilities. and the number of people involved in the use;
2. provide convenient and attractive linkages to existing and
proposed public transport facilities; and
3. maximise accessibility for all anticipated users.
AO5.2 Not Applicable
Roads catering for buses are
1. arterial, distributor, or collector roads;
2. roads which provide highly accessible routes;
3. roads that provide for the shortest and most direct route for an
efficient public transport service; and
4. roads that can efficiently service adjoining development areas.
AO5.3 Not Applicable
Roads catering for buses provide convenient connections to existing and
future public passenger transport facilities.
Page 35
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Comments
AO5.4 Not Applicable
Bus routes are located to maximise patron catchment and to consider
personal safety, lighting and traffic management.
AO5.5 Not Applicable
Development on bus routes does not impact on bus stop infrastructure or
the efficient running of bus services.
AO5.6 Not Applicable
Roads catering for buses are designed and constructed in accordance
the relevant State government standards.
Editor’s Note — Queensland’s Department of Transport and Main
Roads, and the TransLink division within the Department have design
standards for public transport networks and infrastructure.
PO6 AO6.1 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
Development enhances connectivity Development provides direct and convenient pathway linkages between
between existing and future public existing and future public passenger transport facilities. Refer to Section 3.0 and Section 8.0 of TTM report.
passenger transport facilities and other
transport modes.
AO6.2 Not Applicable
Development provides wayfinding information for existing public transport
facilities and interconnecting transport modes.
Editor’s Note— Council has design standards that apply to wayfinding
signage.
Page 36
Pedestrian and cycle infrastructure Table 9.4.7.3 Criteria for assessable development (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Comments
PO7 No acceptable outcome provided Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
Road planning and development designs for
pedestrian and cycle movements and provides Refer to Section 3.0 and Section 8.0 of TTM report.
for future connectivity and integration with
adjoining sites.
PO8 AO8 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
Development provides for cyclists on roads as Roads provide for on-road cycling in accordance with the
required for each category of road as identified standards specified in Council’s Planning Scheme Refer to Section 3.0 of the report.
in the Noosa Road Hierarchy.
Policy PSP6 Engineering Design Standards – Roads,
drainage and earthworks.
PO9 AO9.1 Not Applicable
Development is designed to encourage Pathway planning and design is in accordance
walking and cycling wherever possible over with pedestrian and cycling aspects of Austroads Guides. Refer to Planning Report.
the use of private vehicles.
AO9.2 Not Applicable
Attractive and safe pedestrian and cycle connections to
and through the site are provided with shade trees,
graded walking and cycle paths and lighting.
AO9.3 Not Applicable
Pathways are provided to cater for shared use and cater
for both commuting and recreational usage. Refer to Section 3.0 and Section 8.0 of TTM report..
AO9.4 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
Pathways have ramps at all kerbs designed for
wheelchair and pram access across roads. Refer to Section 8.0 and Appendix A of TTM report.
Page 37
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Comments
AO9.5 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
Development has convenient and prominent pedestrian
entrances that: Refer to Section 3.0 and Section 8.0 of TTM report.
1. are orientated towards the street; and
2. cater for universal access.
AO9.6 Not Applicable
Pathways are adequately lit and have navigational signs.
AO9.7 Not Applicable
Pedestrian and cycle pathways are designed and
constructed to: Refer to development plans
1. provide a stable, smooth surface, including
across driveways, sections and joins;
2. be easily maintained;
3. have a width and longitudinal gradient to cater
for projected usage;
4. provide clear sight-lines for safe use; and
5. be free of any obstructions such as fences,
signage and bollards
AO9.8 Not Applicable
Pedestrian routes border the frontages of residential land,
public parks and business uses with routes through Refer to development plans
parking lots or at the rear of lots avoided.
Page 38
Road Design and Construction Table 9.4.7.3 Criteria for assessable development (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Comments
PO10 AO10 Not Applicable
Roads and pathways are planned and designed to support the function of the road hierarchy and ensure Road planning and
that— design is in accordance
with Council’s Planning
Scheme Policy
1. design and alignment of roads, intersections and all associated works— PSP6 Engineering
Design Standards –
1. convey the primary function of each type of street; Roads, drainage and
2. provide a safe environment for all users; earthworks.
3. are adequate for the design speed environment;
4. are adequate for predicted traffic volumes;
5. maintains the safe and efficient functioning of the road network incorporating
roundabouts as a preference to T intersections;
6. are compatible with existing infrastructure;
7. are easily maintained by Council equipment; and
8. where appropriate, have the ability to accommodate public transport services;
2. road pavement surfaces—
1. are durable enough to carry estimated wheel loads of travelling and parked
vehicles;
2. provide for the safe passage of vehicles, pedestrians, cyclists, and discharge of
stormwater run-off from contributing catchments and the preservation of all-
weather access;
3. kerb and channel—
1. controls vehicle movement by delineating the carriageway for all users;
2. conveys road pavement run-off to stormwater drainage in a manner that allows
the road to be trafficable in 1%AEP local rainfall events; and
4. verges and footpaths provide—
1. safe access for pedestrians and cyclists clear of obstructions;
2. an access area for vehicles onto properties;
3. a corridor allocated for services and utilities; and
4. additional amenity for minor roads.
Page 39
Activity Centres and Community Facilities Table 9.4.7.3 Criteria for assessable development (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Comments
PO11 AO11.1 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
All key destinations such as activity centres, Adjoining and within 200 metres of activity centres, educational Refer to Section 3.0 and Section 8.0 of TTM report .
educational establishments, community establishments, community facilities, beaches and sports grounds:
facilities, aged car facilities, beaches and sports
grounds can be reached by a range of travel 1. road and pathway networks are designed for safe
modes including public transport, walking, pedestrian and cyclist movements;
cycling, taxis, and shared and private vehicles. 2. pathways provide direct pedestrian and
cyclist access to focal points and transit
opportunities;
3. designated bus stops, taxi and shared vehicle set-
down facilities are provided.
AO11.2 Complies with Performance/Acceptable Outcome
On-street parking, drop-off, access to parking and loading facilities Refer to Section 3.0, Section 4.0, Section 7.0 and
and vehicle manoeuvring do not compromise walking and cycling
safety and amenity. Section 8.0 of TTM report .
AO11.3 Not Applicable
Roads that function as main streets within an activity centre are
designed to facilitate active frontages through means such as wide
footpaths and slow speed environments.
Page 40
AO11.4 Not Applicable
Commercial sites fronting main streets, including Sunshine Beach
Road, Poinciana Avenue, Maple Street and Diamond Street, are
provided with access from rear lanes or other access streets for
service vehicles and to parking areas, to reduce potential conflicts
with pedestrians and cyclists by having driveways to these streets.
AO11.5 Not Applicable
Taxi or shared vehicle infrastructure is provided parallel to the kerb,
conveniently located to minimise passenger walking and designed
in accordance with:
1. AS2890.5–1993 Parking facilities – on-street parking and
AS1428.1–2009 Design for access and mobility – general
requirements for access – new building work;
2. AS1742.11–1999 Parking controls – manual of uniform
traffic control devices;
3. AS/NZS 2890.6–2009 Parking facilities – off-street parking
for people with disabilities;
4. Disability standards for accessible public transport 2002
made under section 31(1) of the Disability Discrimination
Act 1992; and
5. AS/NZS 1158.3.1 – Lighting for roads and public spaces,
Part 3.1: Pedestrian area (category P) lighting –
Performance and design requirements.
Page 41
Parking and manoeuvring Table 9.4.1.3 Criteria for assessment (part)
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Comments
PO6 AO6.1 Complies with
Sufficient parking The number of car parking spaces,
Performance/Acceptable Outcome
motor cycle spaces, bicycle spaces
1. is provided having regard to and loading bays is not less than Refer to Section 4.0 of TTM report.
the specifics of the use the minimum number specified
including— in Table 9.4.1.4 Minimum parking
1. the type and intensity requirements including end of trip
of land use; facilities.
2. any existing parking
available on the site; Editor's note— with regard to the
3. hours of operation; provision of end of trip facilities,
4. likely numbers of where there is a conflict with
users; the QDC MP 4.1 for major
5. accessibility to developments the QDC applies.
the site by means For all other development Table
other than private 9.4.1.4 applies.
motor vehicle; AO6.2 Complies with
6. the peak parking Where appropriate, motorcycle
Performance/Acceptable Outcome
demand periods of spaces can be provided on site in
uses on the site; and lieu of required car parking spaces, Refer to Section 4.0 of TTM report.
7. the availability of excluding industry activities, at the
alternative car following rates:
parking; and
1. is provided to accommodate 1. 2 motorcycle spaces
the number and type of provided for 0.5 car
vehicles and motorcycles parking space; or
likely to be generated by the 2. 4 motorcycles spaces
development. provided per 1 car parking
space; and
3. up to a maximum of 4 car
parking spaces.
AO6.3 Complies with
Secure and convenient parking
Performance/Acceptable Outcome
spaces for bicycles are designed
and provided on site in accordance Refer to Section 4.0 and Section 8.0
with— of TTM report.
1. AS2890.3 Bicycle Parking
Facilities; and
2. Cycling aspects of
Austroads
Guides (AP-G88-
14).
Page 42
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Comments
AO6.4 Complies with
Bicycle spaces and end of trip
Performance/Acceptable Outcome
facilities need to be accessible to
all users. Refer to Section 8.0 of TTM report.
PO7 AO7.1 Complies with
The layout of the development provides Parking bays, manoeuvring areas,
Performance/Acceptable Outcome
adequate, clearly defined and easily queuing areas, loading, set down,
accessible pickup areas and driveways are Refer to Section 4.0 and Section 6.0
designed in accordance with the of TTM report.
1. on-site vehicle parking and Australian Standards for Parking
manoeuvring areas; and Facilities.
2. loading and manoeuvring
areas for delivery and service
vehicles. AO7.2 Complies with
Development includes purpose
Performance/Acceptable Outcome
designed spaces for motorcycles
and motor scooters, which are Refer to Section 4.0 of TTM report.
easily identified from the driveway
of the property and located as
close as practicable to the entrance
of the building on site.
PO8 AO8.1 Complies with
Parking and manoeuvring areas are Parking, service areas and
Performance/Acceptable Outcome
designed to manoeuvring areas are setback a
minimum of 2 metres from road Refer to Section 4.0 and Section 7.0
1. not unduly conflict with frontages to allow for landscaping, of TTM report.
pedestrians; and with the exception of Walter Hay
2. be sufficiently setback from Drive, Eenie Creek Road and Holts
road frontages to not Road frontages, where no
dominate the streetscape or development occurs within the
surrounding areas; landscaped frontage setbacks.
3. allow for landscaping to AO8.2
reduce the visual impact of Complies with
In Centre zones, parking, service
the parking, servicing and Performance/Acceptable Outcome
and manoeuvring areas are either
manoeuvring areas; integrated within or under buildings Refer to Section 4.0 TTM report.
4. complement the future and sleeved by usable floor space,
planned character of the or located to the rear of buildings.
area; and
5. avoid development within the Editor's note— Refer to Figure
Walter Hay Drive, Eenie AP3-11A and Figure AP3-11B for
Creek Road and Holts outcomes for car parking in
Road frontage setbacks. centres.
Page 43
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Comments
AO8.3 Not Applicable
Where practicable
vehicle access is from rear Refer to Section 4.0, Section 6.0 and
laneways. Appendix A of TTM report.
PO9 AO9 Complies with
On-site car parking spaces are identified Car parking spaces are provided
Performance/Acceptable Outcome
and reserved for people with disabilities. for people with disabilities at the
rate specified in the current Refer to Section 4.0 of TTM report.
Australian Standards for Parking
Facilities.
PO10 AO10 Complies with
Access and egress points do not impact on Vehicle manoeuvring areas are
Performance/Acceptable Outcome
the safety and operations of the road provided in accordance with the
system. current Australian Standards Refer to Section 4.0 and Section 7.0
Australian Standards for Parking of TTM report.
Facilities so vehicles enter and
leave the site in a forward gear,
excluding dual occupancy or
detached dwellings on local roads.
PO11 AO11 Complies with
Parking areas are designed to At locations where pedestrian and Performance/Acceptable Outcome
vehicle conflicts are likely to occur:
1. provide a progressive Refer to Section 6.0 of TTM report.
reduction in speed between 1. sight distances of at
the external road and internal least 2.5 seconds of
parking spaces; travel time at the
2. ensure lower speeds near designated speed
areas of high pedestrian are provided;
activity through the use of 2. splayed corners on
appropriate road geometry or structures are
devices designed to limit incorporated;
speed; and 3. landscaping is
3. maintain sight distances designed to allow
which are appropriate for the clear views; and
likely operating speeds in all 4. sign placement
areas of potential ensures that sight
pedestrian/vehicle and distance
vehicle/vehicle conflict. requirements are
not impeded.
PO12 AO12.1 Not Applicable
A clearly defined pedestrian network is In large open carparks with greater
provided that – than 200 car parking spaces, a Refer to Section 4.0 and Appendix A
pedestrian path between parking of TTM report.
1. is located in areas where spaces is provided on every
people will choose to walk; second aisle.
Page 44
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Comments
2. ensures that pedestrian AO12.2 Complies with
movement through car For a minimum of 50% of car
Performance/Acceptable Outcome
parking areas or structures parking spaces,
are along aisles rather than pedestrian access to buildings is Refer to Appendix A of TTM report.
across them. not across or through driveways,
carparks, setdown or manoeuvring
areas.
PO13 Complies with
Provision is made for pedestrian and No acceptable outcome provided
Performance/Acceptable Outcome
vehicular queues at conflict points.
Refer to Section 3.0, Section 6.0,
Section 8.0 and Appendix A of TTM
report.
PO14 AO14 Not Applicable
Parking areas are lit to provide security for Lighting is provided in accordance
night-time users. with the Australian Standard for
Road Lighting - Vehicular Traffic
(Category V) Lighting -
Performance Installation and
Design Requirements.
PO15 AO15 Complies with
Site facilities encourage users and End-of-trip facilities are maintained
Performance/Acceptable Outcome
employees to access the site by means of and accessible to all users of the
foot or bicycle through provision of premises as part of common Refer to Section 8.0 of TTM report..
appropriate end of-trip facilities including property.
bicycle parking and shower/change rooms.
PO16 No acceptable outcome provided Complies with
Development with the potential to generate
Performance/Acceptable Outcome
significant traffic and parking impacts gives
appropriate consideration to transport and Refer to Section 5.0 of TTM report.
land use issues.
Editor’s Note—A detailed Traffic Impact
Assessment Report may be required.
PO17 AO17.1 Not Applicable
Parking and manoeuvring areas are Development providing less than
designed to ensure run-off is treated to five car parking spaces is designed Refer to Section 4.0 and Appendix A
remove pollutants prior to leaving the so that the driveway, parking and of TTM report.
premises. manoeuvring areas are formed to
drain to landscaped areas.
AO17.2 Not Applicable
Development providing five or
more car parking spaces is Refer to Stormwater report.
designed to incorporate stormwater
treatment methods to remove
water contaminants likely to runoff
from the general operation of the of
the driveway, parking and
manoeuvring areas.
Page 45
Performance outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Comments
Editor’s Note—Further details are
provided in the Water Quality and
Drainage Code
PO18 No acceptable outcome provided Not Applicable
Parking areas are designed to ensure
drainage without the use of pumps or other Refer to Stormwater report.
electrical apparatus.
PO19 AO19 Not Applicable
Site layout and building design provides Below ground components of
for soft landscaping to be established. buildings, including carparks, do Refer to Landscaping report.
not extend beyond the above
ground footprint to allow for the
provision of landscaping,
particularly
within building setbacks.
Used in these records
Appendix K - Traffic Engineering Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 6.6 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.