Council archive · source document
Reference Document - Geotechnical Investigation Report - DBW24/0090 & RAP24/0025
Rebecca Stead 20248-001-Rev0
3 September 2020
Sand dune slopes are generally close to the ‘limit of equilibrium’ where the surface gradient is about 30°. The
overall slope across the proposed development area is generally in the order of 10˚ to 22˚, being steepest in
the north-eastern corner. The limit of equilibrium is the ‘tipping point’ to instability where the factor of safety
(FOS) of the slope is approximately 1.0. The FOS of a slope is the balance (ratio) between the forces driving
instability (e.g. soil weight, groundwater pressure) and the resisting forces (e.g. soil friction and cohesion).
Steep sand dune slopes generally remain marginally stable (i.e. FOS just greater than 1.0) when they are:
well vegetated (mix of ground cover, shrubs and small trees);
not subjected to concentrated stormwater flows;
not surcharged with additional loads (e.g. fill); and
when the ‘toe’ of the dune is not disturbed.
Where dunes are well vegetated, the plant roots can provide a surface reinforcing layer which may enable
dunes to stand up relatively steeply. Areas outside of structures and concrete ground slabs are generally
covered by vegetation being either grass, shrubs or trees. Discharge of stormwater onto dune slopes may
cause channel erosion, undermining and disturbance of vegetation, resulting in development of generally
localised instability. Stormwater runoff must be collected (or re-directed) and discharged from the site as
discussed in Section 4.5 below.
The primary trigger for large-scale instability of sand dunes is when the toe of the dune is disturbed. This may
be caused by excavations or natural erosion. Sand dune instability due to undercutting of the toe generally
occurs as a translational-type slide where a ‘slab’ of sand on the dune face slides down slope. The depth of
such sliding may range up to a few metres during one event, but on-going erosion can cause retrogressive
failure of dune slopes leading to multiple sliding events, if left unchecked. The risk such an occurrence at this
site is minimal, considering the location of the site being away from features such as the ocean or high flow
natural drainage line that could cause toe erosion.
Considering the existing site conditions (Ref. Section 2), and subject to the implementation of
recommendations given below, it is assessed that there would be a Low (L) Risk of global slope instability
affecting the proposed residential extensions. Regulators (Noosa Shire Council) normally require that a Very
Low or Low Risk of landslide affecting the property must be demonstrated to enable development approval.
Summarised in Table 2 is our qualitative assessment of landslide risk for the development site. A summary
of qualitative terminology for use in assessing risk to property is attached (taken from AGS 2007).
Table 2: Details of Qualitative Risk Assessment for Property (AGS 2007)
Assessed
Hazard Likelihood Consequence
Risk
Comments
Given the position of the site near a dune crest, and
moderate natural gradients (up to 20˚ to 22˚) on the
downslope side of the residence, relatively limited
depth of very loose/loose material (about 1.3 m to
1: Shallow landslide through
1.6 m BGL), and depth of footings recommended, it
very loose to loose natural soils Unlikely Medium Low
is considered Unlikely that a landslip would develop
above the foundation depth
in these materials, subject to implementation of the
recommendations in Section 4. Given a potential
Medium impact from such instability the resultant
risk would be Low as per AGS 2007.
The likelihood of a deep landslide through the medium
dense (or denser) natural sand below the foundation
depth recommended is assessed as Rare due to the
2: Deep landslide through the
moderate overall ground slopes, strength of the
natural medium dense (or
Rare Major Low materials, lack of groundwater, and no evidence of
denser) sand below the
similar large scale previous instability slope instability
foundation depth
on the site. Although the consequence of such a
failure would be Major, the resultant risk is Low as per
AGS 2007.
The potential impacts on slope stability of the development components have been assessed, and the
measures recommended below in Section 4 have been designed to mitigate those impacts.
8/12
Document Set ID: 23080488
Version: 1, Version Date: 27/06/2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Reference Document - Geotechnical Investigation Report - DBW24/0090 & RAP24/0025Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 5.0 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.