Further Advice Response

 The proposed development does not be visually dominant views from the street (Margit
  Crescent).

 The proposed development provides driveway which are divided into two (2) smaller
  areas, interspersed with gardens.

 The proposed development provide a visual rhythm which is repeated along the street
  (Margit Crescent) in reverse.

 The proposed development visually breaks up the front / eastern elevations with stepping
  down street (Margit Crescent) in reverse.

 The proposed development incorporated variation in the material and finishes along the
  street (Margit Crescent).

The benefits and impacts of the proposed development provide (2) separate driveways was
addressed within the traffic impact statement and the visual assessment provided with the
information request response.

In addition, the traffic impact statement incorporated a detailed response to the relevant
probable solutions and specific outcomes within the Driveways and Car Parking Code.

Footpath


 Issue

 The proposed 1.2m footpath does not comply with Council’s requirements.

 Advice Required

 A 1.8m wide path is required.


Applicant’s Response

The revised architectural plans at Attachment B , provide a 1.800m wide footpath for the full
(18.910m) frontage of the site, refer to Extract 15 .