Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Town Planning Report & Appendix A Code Compliance
Original PDF page 201, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Town Planning Report
28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive
Table 10.1.3: Reconfiguring a lot
Performance Outcomes Acceptable Outcomes Response
PO1 Erosion prone areas in a coastal management AO1.1 Where reconfiguring a lot is proposed within the coastal R1 Not Applicable
district are maintained as development free buffers, or management district, the erosion prone area within the lot, or land within The proposed development does not involve reconfiguring a lot.
where permanent buildings or structures exist, coastal 40 metres of the foreshore (whichever is greater), is surrendered to the
erosion risks are avoided or mitigated. State for public use unless:
(1) the development is in a port or is for coastal-dependent development,
or
(2) the surrender of the land will not enhance coastal management
outcomes, for example, because there is already substantial
development seaward of the lot.
Editor’s note: Land surrendered to the State for public use under AO1.1 is
to be:
(1) placed in a State land reserve for beach protection and coastal
management purposes under the Land Act 1994, with local
government as trustee, or
(2) managed for beach protection and coastal management purposes
under another management regime to the satisfaction of the chief
executive administering the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and Land
Act 1994, if it is demonstrated that AO1.1(1) cannot be reasonably
achieved.
(3) The Land Act 1994 also includes provisions for voluntary land
surrender for freehold land to the satisfaction of the chief executive
administering the Land Act.
PO2 Development maintains or enhances general AO2.1 Reconfiguring a lot that abuts the foreshore or tidal waters is R2 Not Applicable
public access to or along the foreshore, unless this is designed to enhance public access if it involves the creation of 10 or more The proposed development does not involve reconfiguring a lot.
contrary to the protection of coastal resources or lots or the opening of a new road, unless it is for coastal-dependent
public safety. development.
PO3 Development in connection with a canal AO3.1 The canal avoids intersecting with land or tidal land where the R3 Not Applicable
enhances public access to coastal waters. passage, use or movement of vessels in water could be restricted by the The proposed development does not involve reconfiguring a lot.
registered proprietor of the land.
AND
AO3.2 The area of the canal relating to the development is surrendered to
the State as a public waterway.
AND
AO3.3 The plans of subdivision for the canal are consistent with
Requirements for plans of subdivision of an artificial waterway, Department
of Environment and Heritage Protection, 2013.
December 2014 Cardno HRP A120
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.