Original source · versioned page text
MCU14/0106 & OPW15/0001 Town Planning Report & Appendix A Code Compliance
Original PDF page 42, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
Town Planning Report
28 Eenie Creek Road, Noosaville and parts of the road reserves of Hofmann Drive and Walter Hay Drive
6.3.2 Coastal Environment
The below table provides a response to the requirements of the Coastal Environment State interest.
Requirement Applicant’s Response
Development:
(1) avoids or minimises adverse impacts on: Complies
(a) coastal processes and coastal resources, and The proposed Noosa Civic expansion avoids direct impacts
(b) scenic amenity of important natural coastal on coastal processes as defined in the SPP.
landscapes, views and vistas, and The Noosa Civic expansion footprint is not mapped as an
erosion prone area, medium storm tide inundation area or
high storm tide inundation area.
The SPP refers to the Coastal Protection and Management
Act 1995 for the definition of ‘coastal resources’.
The Act defines coastal resources as “…the natural and
cultural resources of the coastal zone”, where natural
resources are further defined as “…the physical features and
processes of the zone, including wildlife, soil, water,
minerals and air.” Cultural resources are “…places or
objects that have anthropological, archaeological, historical,
scientific, spiritual, visual or sociological significance or
value, including such significance or values under Aboriginal
tradition or Island customs”.
There are no cultural resources present.
While there will be impacts on natural resources as defined
in the SPP, it is noted they are located in an area 0.5km from
Eenie Creek, 1.5km from Lake Weyba and 5.8km from
Sunrise Beach and as such, impacts associated with the
development on coastal resources can be regarded as
minimal.
Notwithstanding this, impacts are minimised through
retention of vegetation within Covenant J, improving wildlife
movement into this area through the provision of an
underpass and by undertaking clearing in a sequential
manner under the guidance of a spotter catcher.
The proposed development will be mainly screened from
external views, with built form visually subordinate to the
proposed retained and planted bands of vegetation
Refer to Appendix I - Visual Amenity/Landscape
Integration Report for further analysis and discussion.
(2) maintains or enhances general public access to, or Not Applicable
along, the foreshore unless this is contrary to the The proposed development is not located adjacent to a
protection of coastal resources or public safety, and foreshore and does not alter access arrangements to same.
(3) avoids private marine development attaching to, or Complies
extending across, non-tidal state coastal land abutting The proposed development does not include private marine
tidal waters, and development.
(4) that is private marine development, occurs only Not Applicable
where the development: The proposed development does not include private marine
(a) is located on private land abutting state tidal land and development.
is used for property access purposes, and
(b) occupies the minimum area reasonably required for
its designed purpose, and
(c) does not require the construction of coastal protection
works, shoreline or riverbank hardening or dredging for
marine access, and
(5) of canals, dry land marinas and artificial waterways: Not Applicable
(a) avoids adverse impacts on coastal resources, and The proposed development does not involve canals, dry
(b) will not contribute to: land marinas and artificial waterways.
i. degradation of water quality, or
December 2014 Cardno HRP 42
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.