MCU12/0023 Notice Of Submission - Renalda Joy Gorrie

"
        \Iotmai!Print Message                                                                  Page 2 of2

    .
          ,
               ,




           Council opposed the outdoor.dining for noise reasons.
           On 4 September 2009, in order to obtain the Council’s approval the

           developer willingly conceded that outdoor dining would be prohibited.
           This agreement allowed the developer to obtain approval for an internal
           area of 306m2 for "Entertainment and Dining Business".

           Now it seeks to obtain approval for 70m2 of outdoor dining (seating 56

           persons) including 30m2 (26 persons) facing David Low Way opposite my
           home.
           The proposed closure of the outdoor dining area facing David Low Way at

           10pm will not be enforced, especially if the other outdoor dining area is
           allowed to continue to 12 midnight. The departure of diners from the
           restaurant will result in on-going noise beyond 10pm until after midnight.

           There is also no guarantee from the developer that there will be no
           entertainment and amplified music in the three proposed Restaurants.
           It is clear that the developer is not offering to do anything to reduce the
           additional noise generated by the outdoor dining proposed. Once again it
           ignores detrimental affect on the amenity of the area.
           Car Parking
           Has the Council assessed the proposed addition of 7 car parks as sufficient
           for 56 additional diners or has this simply been overlooked?
           The developer’s plans from Simmonds & Bristow Pty Ltd refer to the
           Retail/Restaurant buildings as "Hotel/Commercial area". Will this be the
           subject of the next attempt to vary the conditions agreed on 4 September
           2009?
           This application by the developer needs much closer investigation than
           has occurred to date and has been possible given the developer’s late

           provision of this material.
           I hope that you can get the Court to require advertising of the application
           so that closer investigation can occur.

           t

           Yours Sincerely,




           Mrs R Gorrie
           t




        http://snI37w.sntI37.mail.live.comlmaillPrintMessages.aspx?cpids=d24eabc9-fed3-40...   7/02/2012