Original source · versioned page text
MCU17/0559.05 - PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COURT APPEAL 1842 OF 2026 - FOR MINOR CHANGE TO A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE FOR A DUPLEX DWELLING AT 2/16 GRANT STREET, NOOSA HEADS · Report
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 11 AUGUST 2026 7.2.6 MCU17/0559.05 - PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COURT APPEAL 1842 OF 2026 - FOR MINOR CHANGE TO A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR A MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE FOR A DUPLEX DWELLING AT 2/16 GRANT STREET, NOOSA HEADS Author Development Assessment Manager, Patrick Murphy Development & Regulation Department Index ECM/ Application/ MCU17/0559.05 ECM/ Case/ MAAN Investments Pty Ltd Attachments 1. ATTACHMENT 1 – DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT MANAGER’S REPORT 2. ATTACHMENT 2 - APPROVED PLANS - MCU17 0559.04 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report concerns Planning and Environment Court Appeal No. 1842 of 2026 relating to Council's refusal of Minor Change Application MCU17/0559.05 for a dual occupancy development at 2/16 Grant Street, Noosa Heads. The appeal seeks to remove a requirement for planter boxes that were imposed as part of an earlier approval to address non-compliances associated with the development's gross floor area and plot ratio. The original development approval for a Multiple Housing Type 2 Duplex was issued in August 2020. Subsequent inspections undertaken during the plan sealing process identified significant departures from the approved plans which resulted in the development exceeding the maximum gross floor area and plot ratio controls applicable to the site. To address these non-compliances, a retrospective minor change application was approved in January 2024. As part of that approval, planter boxes were required along sections of the lower level to provide screening and mitigate the visual and planning impacts resulting from the exposed lower floor level. In February 2026, the applicant sought a further minor change to remove the planter box requirement, citing structural deterioration, moisture retention, termite risks and maintenance concerns. Following assessment, Council refused the application on 2 June 2026, finding that the proposal would be contrary to the intent of the planning scheme, would fail to address the non- compliant built form outcome, and would undermine the consistent application of gross floor area controls. The applicant subsequently appealed Council's decision to the Planning and Environment Court on 23 June 2026. The appellant contends that removal of the planter boxes would not adversely affect surrounding properties, would improve the amenity and maintenance of the premises, and would remain consistent with relevant planning scheme provisions. Council's position is that the planter boxes form an integral component of the approved planning outcome and that their removal would result in an unacceptable planning precedent and built form outcome inconsistent with the development approval and planning scheme intent. The recommendation is that Council note the appeal and resolve to defend the proceedings. RECOMMENDATION That Council
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 1 page
Page 2
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING 11 AUGUST 2026 A. Note the report by the Manager Development Assessment to the General Committee Meeting dated 11 August 2026 regarding Planning & Environment Court Appeal 1842 of 2026; and B. Agree to defend the appeal. REPORT Refer to attachment 1. Link to Corporate Plan Not Applicable. Previous Council Consideration Not Applicable. Finance Refer to Attachment 1. Risk & Opportunities Refer to Attachment 1. Human Rights Human Rights Compatibility Statement In developing this Report, the subject matter has been considered in accordance with the requirements of the Queensland Human Rights Act 2019. It is considered that the subject matter does not conflict with any human rights and supports a human rights approach to decision making by Council. Council representatives will endeavour to act and make decisions under this report in a manner that is compatible with human rights. This report should be read in conjunction with Council’s Human Rights Policy. Consultation External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder Refer to Attachment 1. Internal Consultation Refer to Attachment 1.