Original source · versioned page text
PM Submission - S Burdekin - Proforma - MCU21/0110
Q-i I 6 \1 0
Objection to the Proposed Hotel at Noosa Springs
It has not gone unnoticed that this DA has been opened for comment for a short period of time just before
Christmas when most people are otherwise occupied or away.
No analysis has been provided in the Adamson Town Planning Report of the impact upon existing users of
Noosa Springs Resort, including members and residents. This impact is significant. The "material change of
use" will adversely affect every person in Noosa Springs, The Oasis, Parkridge, Elysium and The Fairways (795
properties), resort staff and members.
The development fails so many tests:
• It isn't "boutique", in fact it will have roughly the same number of rooms as the French Quarter in
Hastings Street
• At 12m high it will visually overpower existing buildings
• Two thirds of the development is to be built on land zoned "recreational and open space"
• It breaches height and setback restrictions
• Zoning maps indicate it is a "Core Koala Habitat", "a Koala Priority Habitat" and this will be lost
together with other fauna and flora
• With potentially 224 occupants, plus children and additional staff, the already existing fire evacuation
risk will be significantly increased with potentially disastrous ramifications. Numerous discussions
with Council in the past has done little to alleviate this very serious issue e.g. The Oasis BC Review of
Emergency Evacuation Provisions
® The DA suggests that the guests and staff will be arriving and leaving on 2 wheels or public transport.
This is just not realistic
• An already busy carpark will be inadequate for guests, staff, golfers and those who use the spa, gym,
medical facilities, restaurant etc. It is already over capacity at peak times and the Parking Studies
lack meaningful analysis
• There will be increased noise and activity in an area where many elderly people reside and will affect
the quiet enjoyment and wellbeing of residents and potentially their security and safety
• The club house, golf course, gym, restaurant, spa and pool will not be as available to residents and
members with Tee Times likely to be at a premium as hotel guests will likely be given priority
• The developers are potentially "double-dipping" as the land originally earmarked for a hotel was used
to build Parkridge.
8 9
Many of the above serve to undermine the integrity of the Noosa Plan 2020. RECEIVED VN
fo
I y —>
I object to the Application for the proposed hotel on the above grounds. J 20 L
n 'S
Noosa Council AV
V
Counter
US.VA.fci n- \2-zo21
Name Date
ocstA rcvifls
Address
Box:
[OCR of page images]
Mc au OWd
Objection to the Proposed Hotel at Noosa Springs
It has not gone unnoticed that this DA has been opened for comment for a short period of time just before
Christmas when most people are otherwise occupied or away.
No analysis has been provided in the Adamson Town Planning Report of the impact upon existing users of
Noosa Springs Resort, including members and residents. This impact is significant. The “material change of
use” will adversely affect every person in Noosa Springs, The Oasis, Parkridge, Elysium and The Fairways (795
properties), resort staff and members.
The development fails so many tests:
Many of the above serve to undermine the integrity of the Noosa Plan 2020.
| object to the Application for the proposed hotel on the above grounds.
| (2
dual C.\eanerial lft 202.
Name
It isn’t “boutique”, in fact it will have roughly the same number of rooms as the French Quarter in
Hastings Street
At 12m high it will visually overpower existing buildings
Two thirds of the development is to be built on land zoned “recreational and open space”
It breaches height and setback restrictions
Zoning maps indicate it is a “Core Koala Habitat”, “a Koala Priority Habitat” and this will be lost
together with other fauna and flora
With potentially 224 occupants, plus children and additional staff, the already existing fire evacuation
risk will be significantly increased with potentially disastrous ramifications. Numerous discussions
with Council in the past has done little to alleviate this very serious issue e.g. The Oasis BC Review of
Emergency Evacuation Provisions
The DA suggests that the guests and staff will be arriving and leaving on 2 wheels or public transport.
This is just not realistic
An already busy carpark will be inadequate for guests, staff, golfers and those who use the spa, gym,
medical facilities, restaurant etc. It is already over capacity at peak times and the Parking Studies
lack meaningful analysis
There will be increased noise and activity in an area where many elderly people reside and will affect
the quiet enjoyment and wellbeing of residents and potentially their security and safety
The club house, golf course, gym, restaurant, spa and pool will not be as available to residents and
members with Tee Times likely to be at a premium as hotel guests will likely be given priority
The developers are potentially “double-dipping” as the land originally earmarked for a hotel was used
to build Parkridge.
Date
ie
sus [b( \oosi4, 8? ings “pus CoS vt Hevas
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (PM Submission - S Burdekin - Proforma - MCU21_0110.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.